George Washington to Major General Lafayette, 4 June 1781
To Major General Lafayette
New Windsor June 4th 1781
My dear Marqs
I have this moment received information that the letters, of which the inclosed are copies, with other dispatches and the Southern Mail, were taken between this and Morris town and carried—it is supposed—into New York—It is unhappy that the communication is so insecure! and that corrispondencies from one part of the Country to another are liable to such accidents!1
I have received your letters of the 24th Ulto,2 but cannot, as the Gentn who bears this to Philadelphia is waiting, do more than acknowledge the safe arrival of them except entreating you not to hazard before nor after your junction with General Wayne a General Action unless you have very sure grounds to do it on. No rational person will condemn you for not fighting with the odds against and while so much is depending on it—but all will censure a rash step if it is not attended with success. adieu I am sincerely & Affectionately Yrs
Go: Washington
ADfS, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW.
1. GW most likely enclosed duplicates of his letters to Lafayette dated 31 May. The British had intercepted both letters. The duplicates have not been found.
British major Frederick Mackenzie, stationed in New York City, wrote in his diary entry for 5 June: “Ensign John Moody, came in early this morning with a Rebel Mail which he intercepted a few days ago, near Sussex Court house, going from Washington’s quarters to Congress. The information obtained by The Commander in Chief from the despatches and letters found in this Mail, is of the utmost consequence, as they contain the particulars of the conference held the 17th of May at Weathersfield in Connecticut, between Washington and Rochambeau, and the whole plan of their operations for the ensuing Campaign.
“The Capture of this Mail is extremely consequential, and gives the Commander in Chief the most perfect knowledge of the designs of the Enemy.
“Ensign Moody received a reward of 200 Guineas for this Service.
“General Knyphausen, and Lieut Genl Robertson, met the Commander in Chief this afternoon, to examine the papers taken” (
, 2:536; see also James Robertson to Jeffrey Amherst, 12 June, in , 202–6). For the stratagem that enabled Ensign John Moody to capture this mail, see , 41–42. William Smith, royal chief justice of New York, wrote that Gen. Henry Clinton was “elated with his Discoveries. … Sir Henry wishes they may attack his Posts here” ( , 421).In a letter dated 9–12 June, Clinton sent copies of all the intercepted letters to George Germain, secretary of state for the American colonies. GW discussed allied strategy for the campaign in his letter to John Sullivan, 29 May, and in his first letter to Lafayette, 31 May. Also sent were GW to Elias Dayton, 28 May; to William Stephens Smith and to Samuel Huntington, both 30 May; and to Lund Washington, to John Parke Custis, and a second letter to Lafayette, all 31 May. The intercepted mail included a packet of dispatches that Lieutenant General Rochambeau had sent GW for forwarding to Philadelphia (see Rochambeau to GW, 28 May, and GW to Rochambeau, 3 June). This packet included Rear Admiral Barras’s letter to La Luzerne, 27 May, and Rochambeau to La Luzerne, same date, the latter in cipher, a sure sign to Clinton of its significance (see , 19:120–22, and The Wethersfield Conference and Aftermath, 14 May–16 June, editorial note, and notes 34–35).
When forwarding copies of some intercepted letters, Clinton wrote Lt. Gen. Charles Cornwallis from New York City on 8 June that he was “threatned with a siege” (
, 5:123–25, quote on 123). That belief conditioned Clinton’s reaction to subsequent allied movements.