George Washington to Major General Lafayette, 31 May 1781
To Major General Lafayette
New Windsor May 31st 1781
My dear Marqs
I have just returned from Weathersfield at which I expected to have met the Count de Rochambeau & Count de Barras, but the British fleet having made its appearance off Block Island, the Admiral did not think it prudent to leave Newport. Count Rochambeau was only attended by Chevr Chattellux—Generals Knox and Duportail were with me.1
Upon a full consideration of our affairs in every point of view—an attempt upon New York with its present Garrison (which by estimation is reduced to 4500 regular Troops & about2 3000 irregulars) was deemed preferable to a Southern operation as we had not the Command of the Water—The reasons which induced this determination were the dangers to be apprehended from the approaching Heats—the inevitable dissipation & loss of Men by so long a march—and the difficulty of transportation—but above all, it was thought that we had a tolerable prospect of expelling the enemy or obliging them to withdraw part of their force from the Southward, which last would give the most effectual relief to those States. The French Troops are to march this way as soon as certain circumstances will admit, leaving about 200 men at Providence with the heavy Stores and 500 Militia upon Rhode Island to secure the works.3
I am endeavouring to prevail upon the States to fill up their Battalions, for the Campaign; if they cannot do it upon better terms, and to send in ample and regular supplies of Provision4—Thus you perceive it will be sometime before our plan can be ripe for execution, and that a failure on our part in men and Supplies may defeat it; but I am in hopes that the States in this quarter will exert themselves to attain what has long been a favourite & is an important object to them.
We have rumours, but I cannot say they are well founded, that the enemy are about to quit New Yk altogether. Should they do this we must follow them of necessity, as they can have no other view than endeavouring to Sieze & secure the Southern States, if not to hold them finally, to make them the means of an advantageous Negociation of Peace.5
I take it for granted that your last dispatches inform you fully of European Affairs and that you can judge from them of the probability of such an event as I have mentioned taking place. As you have no cypher by which I can write to you in safety, and my letters have been frequently intercepted of late I restrain myself from mentioning many matters I wish to communicate to you.6
I shall advise you every now and then of the progress of our preparations—It would be unnecessary for you to be here at present, and I am sure you would not wish to leave your charge while you are so near an enemy, or untill you could deliver them up to General Greene or to another Officer capable of exercising the command which you are in—You will always remember My dear Marquis7 that your return to this Army depends upon your own choice—and that I am with every sentiment of esteem regd & Affecte Yr Most Obedt Servt
Go: Washington
ALS, MiU-C: Clinton Papers; Df, DLC:GW; copy, P.R.O.: 30/11/6, Cornwallis Papers; copy, P.R.O.: C.O. 5/102; copy, UK-LoPHL: Parliamentary Archives; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. The ALS, which the British intercepted, is docketed “Private” (see GW to Lafayette, 4 June, n.1). Gen. Henry Clinton enclosed the copy at P.R.O.: C.O. 5/102 in a letter he wrote George Germain dated 9–12 June (see , 19:120–22).
1. See The Wethersfield Conference, 14 May–16 June, editorial note. For Rear Admiral Barras’s absence, see his letter to GW, 17 May, and GW to Barras, 23 May.
2. On the draft, which GW’s aide-de-camp Tench Tilghman penned, GW wrote “abt” above the line.
3. For the departure of the French army from Newport, see Rochambeau to GW, 9 June, and n.2 to that document. For the subsequent march from Providence, see Rochambeau to GW, 15 June, and n.2 to that document.
4. See GW’s circulars to the New England states on 10 and 24 May (the latter being Document IV with The Wethersfield Conference and Aftermath, 14 May–16 June, editorial note).
5. For one source of the rumors, see Arthur St. Clair to GW, 21 May; see also GW to Samuel Huntington, 30 May. GW soon discounted the reports (see his letter to Rochambeau, 2 June).
6. GW wrote the preceding sentence (but omitted the words “of late”) along a margin on the draft.
7. GW inserted the preceding three words on the draft.
8. The draft does not include a postscript, and this thought appears as the final sentence before the closing, which GW wrote: “I am Dr Sir” (see also GW’s second letter to Lafayette on this date).
9. See Benjamin Tallmadge to GW, 29 May, n.1. Maj. Gen. William Phillips, British commander in Virginia, had died on 13 May (see Lafayette to GW, 18 May). Gen. Henry Clinton intended to send Lt. Gen. James Robertson as a replacement, but Lt. Gen. Charles Cornwallis’s arrival obviated the need (see Robertson to Jeffrey Amherst, 20 May and 12 June, in , 200–206).