George Washington to Colonel Timothy Pickering, 6 May 1781
To Colonel Timothy Pickering
Head Quarters New Windsor May 6th 1781
Dear Sir
I enclose for your inspection, Original Letters from Major General Heath & Brigadier General Clinton, describing in the most forcible terms, the terrible prospect before them, and the inevitable disasters that must ensue, unless provisions are furnished (and that instantly) for the Troops and Garrisons in their respective Departments—when you have read these Letters you will be pleased to return them to me again.1
Nothing further need certainly be said, to enforce the necessity of putting every wheel in motion to hasten the transportation of the salted Provisions, on which our sole dependence for immediate releif must be placed—From the measures which had been taken, and the representations of Mr Pomeroy, I expected nearly or quite all the Provisions on the West side of Connecticut River would have been forwarded, or forwarding on before this time2—Only a few hundred Barrels have yet arrived, and I am not able to learn in what state the transportation now is, or what our prospects from that quarter are3—Should your information respecting this supply, neither be so particular or favorable, as to remove all our fears on the subject, I think it will be adviseable to send4 instantly an able & active Officer of your Department, to make use of the spur of the occasion, to carry the measures of transportation already projected, rapidly & fully5 into execution.6 I am Dear Sir Your most Obedt Servant
Go: Washington
LS, in David Humphreys’s writing, DNA: RG 93, manuscript file no. 26372; Df, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. Pickering docketed the LS: “Answd instantly” (see Pickering to GW, this date).
1. For the likely enclosed letters, see James Clinton to GW, 30 April–1 May, and William Heath’s two letters to GW, 6 May. See also GW to Pickering, 7 May, and n.1.
2. See Ralph Pomeroy to GW, 11 and 14 April.
3. For detailed information on provisions sent from Connecticut towns west of the Connecticut River, see Pickering to GW, 12 May.
4. This word comes from the draft, which Humphreys also penned. He wrote “sent” on the LS.
5. Humphreys did not underline these words on the draft.
6. GW may refer to recent efforts to hire ox teams in Connecticut (see Pomeroy to GW, 8 April, and n.2 to that document).
7. Humphreys wrote “own” after striking out “private” on the LS. He interlineated “my own” above “private” on the draft.
8. For the new congressional monetary policy, see Philip Schuyler to GW, 12 March 1780, and notes 3 and 4 to that document.