Major General Samuel Holden Parsons to George Washington, 2 May 1781
From Major General Samuel Holden Parsons
[Redding, Conn.] 2nd May 1781
Dear General
By Inteligence from New York as late as Saturday (which I have every Reason to beleive) General Arnold was every Hour expected there to take Command of an Expedition.1 Admiral Arbuthnot is going to England his Officers refusing to serve with him since the Action with the french Fleet—his Baggage was landed.2
Admiral Graves who commands the Fleet was in New York on Saturday but expected to sail in a few Days3—five Ships of the Line were in East River the rest in North River & below—the fleet with Provisions had arrivd without Loss.4 the Enemy appear in high Spirits & say all the Money for the currant Year is raisd; This I think probable as Government Bills have risen there from ten per Cent discount to Par—Two Regiments of foreigners at Jamaica are under marching Orders and were paraded on Sunday morning to march.5
Your Excellency’s Letter to some Person to the Southward, wherein you mention the State of our Army Armes & Clothing gives great Pleas⟨ure⟩ to those who know it in New York6—great Dependance is placd on the Defection of Vermont, they say their Measures are fully securd there: and that an Army may be expected from Canada soon.7
I have desird Capt. Walker to receive the Money due on my Warrant at the Pay Office; if any order of your Excellency’s should be necessary, I should be greatly obliged by your Excellency’s Direction to have it paid—I have receivd Nothing for Eighteen Months, have expended all my own Monies, and cannot even redeem my Horses which the Quarter Master has pledgd for the keeping Past Winter.8 I am with great Esteem Yr Excellency’s Obedt Servt
Saml H. Parsons
ALS, DLC:GW. For the location supplied in the dateline, see Parsons to GW, 30 April, source note.
1. British brigadier general Benedict Arnold did not return to New York City until June. The previous Saturday was 28 April.
2. Vice Adm. Marriot Arbuthnot again had requested removal from his command when he wrote the Earl of Sandwich, First Lord of the Admiralty, from the Royal Oak at New York on 15 April: “Excuse this repeated prayer to be relieved, as my impatience increases hourly. Command me anywhere else” ( , 4:171). British captain John Peebles, then on Long Island, N.Y., had written in his diary entry for 12 April: “Various accounts of the late sea action off the Chesapeak, some accuse old Mariot of want of spirit & conduct, & some make relections on the behaviour of other ships” ( , 437). British major Frederick Mackenzie, stationed in New York City, wrote in his diary entry for 17 April: “Some Officers of Navy speak more freely than ever of Admiral Arbuthnot’s conduct on the 16th March, and say he deserves to be hanged. Others say they will bring him to a Court Martial.
“The Admirals Arbuthnot and Graves do not speak, and the fleet is divided into parties. While such dissensions prevail, nothing great can be expected” (Destouches to GW, 19 March. William Smith, royal chief justice of New York, recorded in his memoirs for 25 April: “Arbuthnot in a Corner told me he should leave us within a Month” ( , 402). Arbuthnot retained command of the fleet until his departure from New York City in July (see the entry for 4 July in , 2:560).
, 2:508). For the Battle of Cape Henry on 16 March, see3. The fleet put to sea on 14 May (see William Heath to GW, 1 May, n.1). British major general James Robertson, military governor of New York, wrote Lord George Germain on 6 May with a report that Arbuthnot had “landed fourteen hundred sick and scurbutick men” and “is here unable to go to sea for want of hands—On the Admiral’s requisition, with the Commander in Chief’s consent, other applications having proved ineffectual, all the sailors here have been pressed for the fleet” ( , 190–91). Hessian major Carl Leopold Baurmeister had written in his dispatch from New York City on 26 April that Arbuthnot’s “fleet has many sick, and only a few return from the hospital established on Governor’s Island—most of them die—which is the reason why the navy has pressed already four times” ( , 424).
4. The New-York Gazette: and the Weekly Mercury for 23 April reported: “Yesterday a Fleet of Victuallers, and some private Vessels, arrived here from South-Carolina, under Convoy of several of his Majesty’s Ships.” Mackenzie wrote in his diary entry for 22 April: “Signals early this Morning for a fleet of Men of war, and Merchant ships or transports. The whole came up this afternoon, and anchored safe in the harbour.” He described the ships as the Assurance, 44 guns; Charlestown, 32 guns; Amphitrite, 24 guns; and “about 40 other vessels, principally transports, from Charlestown; with Clothing, Camp Equipage, Military & Naval Stores. … The Assurance has brought out a large sum of Money in specie for the Army” ( , 2:509–10).
5. In his diary entry for 1 May, Mackenzie reported: “The two Battalions of Hessian Grenadiers from Jamaica & Flushing, crossed from Brooklyn this Morning and took up the quarters of the Anspachers” in New York City ( , 2:516).
6. See GW to Benjamin Harrison, 27 March. For the recent interception of GW’s mail, see his letter to Elias Dayton, 4 April, and n.2 to that document.
7. Parsons expanded on earlier intelligence regarding Vermont (see his letter to GW, 30 April, and n.3 to that document).
8. GW replied to Parsons on 3 May.