George Washington Papers

George Washington to Lieutenant General Rochambeau, 16 April 1781

To Lieutenant General Rochambeau

Head Quarters New Windsor 16th April 1781.

Sir

I was last night honored with a letter from your Excellency bearing date the 7th instant, which I presume must have been a mistake, as you acknowledge the receipt of mine of the 6th.1

The intelligence communicated in mine of the 10th respecting a further embarkation from New York is confirmed by a variety of accounts.2 The number or exact destination is not yet ascertained, but all agree that it is to some part of the southward, and that Sir Henry Clinton is to command. I am also advised that the British Fleet has arrived at the Hook3—whether all or only part of the ships are there I cannot yet tell, but the moment I receive more particular intelligences they shall be transmitted to your Excellency.

The preparations you are making will not only serve to give the enemy jealousies, but they will put you in readiness to move this way, should circumstances require it—Your Excellency may be assured of having all possible previous notice should the measure become necessary.

I inclose you a New York Gazette which has one paragraph which makes me uneasy, it is that which speaks of a French Convoy being intercepted in the Bay of Biscay.4 I have the honor to be with sincere Regard Your Excellency’s Most obt and humble Servt

Go: Washington

P.S. I beg leave to recommend the enclosed for Colo. Laurens to your Excellency’s care.5 If the transports should have sailed you will be pleased to send it by the next opportunity.6

LS, in Tench Tilghman’s writing, CtY-BR:R; Df, DLC:GW; Rochambeau’s French translation, CtY-BR:R; LB, in French, DLC: Rochambeau Papers, vol. 7; Varick transcript, DLC:GW.

1For the misdated letter, see Rochambeau to GW, 12 April. Rochambeau had acknowledged GW’s letter of 7 April.

2For one such account, see Elias Dayton to GW, 14 April; see also GW to Rochambeau, 10 April, postscript.

3See William Heath to GW, 14 April (third letter).

4The enclosure, which was an extraordinary issue of The Royal Gazette (New York), has not been identified, but see GW to Rochambeau, 22 April.

6Rochambeau replied to GW on 18 April.

Index Entries