To James Madison from William Jarvis, 13 February 1807
From William Jarvis
Lisbon 13 Feby 1807
Sir.
I had the honor to address you the original of the foregoing of the 22nd. Ulto & the post[s]cript of the 29th. by the Brig Maria, Captn Carew via Alexandria. Duplicates of the inclosures therein described go herewith.1 In that letter I omitted to acknowledge the receipt of a letter the 17 Jany. address’d to Mr Erving endorsed Department of state, another recd via Baltimore for the same Gentleman, with the same endorsement the 24 Jany,2 and I received two others delivered at the Collectors Office in Boston, for the same Gentleman, one endorsed department of state & I think one of them dated 10 Novr. on the outside.3 I presume its detention was owing to no vessel having come direct from that port for several weeks before. All these letters I forwarded by the ensuing posts. The inclosed yesterday received from Mr Erving will probably acknowledge the reception of the two former, as he mentions their reception in the letter which accompanied it to me.4
The information of Mons. Rayneval relative to the battle between the Russian & French Armies proves to be incorrect. He recd it through the Spanish Legation just before he communicated it to me. It was published in the Madrid Gazette & was probably extracted from some of the French papers, as it first appeared in Paris.5 It was for several days, generally beleived here, as I find it was also in France & Spain. A partial action however actually took place in which it appears the French got the advantage. A new treaty being formed between the Porte, Russia & England is also contradicted. It is now said that a new Treaty has been formed between France & the Divan of Constantinople. Both may be true, as the porte may have formed one with Russia & England under the presumption that the coalition with Prussia would prove successful; finding it did not, it repaired its mistake by renewing its former connections with France.
Burr’s expedition is making much talk in Europe. Here many persons seem to think that the observations in the Federal papers regarding his intentions are correct, but the better informed view the affair in the right point of light. The step which the President so wisely took regarding the affair, will unquestionably have a very happy effect at the Courts of Paris & Madrid, at least it ought. With entire Respect I have the honor to be Sir Yr: Mo: Ob: servt.
William Jarvis
RC, two copies (DNA: RG 59, CD, Lisbon, vol. 3). First RC appended to a copy of Jarvis to JM, 22 Jan. 1807. Second RC docketed by Forrest and marked “(Dup).” For enclosures, see nn. 1 and 4.
1. See Jarvis to JM, 22 Jan. 1807 (second letter), nn. 4, 7, and 10.
2. Jarvis may have referred to JM to George W. Erving and the other U.S. ministers in London and Paris, 2 Dec. 1806, a copy of which Erving received on 20 January 1807; see Erving’s acknowledgment in Erving to JM, 21 Jan. 1807. Jarvis also may have referred to a 25 September 1806 letter from Bernard Smith of the State Department acknowledged in Erving’s 8 February 1807 letter to JM.
3. Jarvis may have referred to Wagner to Erving, 3 Oct. 1806, in addition to JM to Erving, 10 Nov. 1806; see Erving’s acknowledgment of Wagner’s letters in Erving to JM, 7 Jan. 1807.
4. Jarvis may have enclosed Erving to JM, 21 Jan. or 8 Feb. 1807.
5. For the reports in the Gazeta extraordinaria de Madrid, see Jarvis to JM, 22 Jan. 1807 (second letter), n. 12.