Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 5 February 1824
To James Monroe
Monticello Feb. 5. 24.
Dear Sir
The inclosed letter is from a person entirely unknown to me; yet it seems to expect a confidence which prudence could1 give to a stranger. and as he seems to write under your authority, I take the liberty of confiding my answer to yourself2 directly, and of returning his paper to you. I do not know that the publication of the papers of the old Congress could be objected to, except such as might contain personalities of no consequence to history. but care should be taken that they should be impartially published, and not all on one side.3 we have seen how false a face may be given to history by the garbling of documents. even during the old Congress, and in it’s body, we had our whigs & tories. mr Wagner says that for the present4 he acknoleges no party, & supposes his continuance in office during 6. years of my administration a proof of his fidelity and impartiality, even while he was a party man. but every one knows that the clerks of the offices had been appointed under federal heads, who appointed federalists only and exclusively, that the whole mass of them were federal,5 and that I never meddled with any of them. his conversion from vehemence6 to neutrality having taken place only since his withdrawing from the editorship of the Baltimore Federalist the proofs of it have not yet reached this part of the country. yet his word need not be7 doubted further than as we all believe ourselves neutral. he is certainly capable of the task, and has the advantage of being familiar with the arrangement of the papers; yet not more so than the gentlemen now in that office, and who have been longer in it than he has. on the whole my opinion is favorable to the publication, when it can be fairly made; but that it’s want is not so pressing but that it is better to let it wait until it can be so done as to give to history it’s true face.
I shall be among those most rejoiced at seeing La Fayette again. but I hope Congress is prepared to go through with their compliment worthily: that they do not mean to invite him merely to dine; that provision will be made for his expences here, which you know he cannot afford, and that they will not send him back empty handed. this would place us under indelible8 disgrace in Europe. some 3. or 4. good townships in Missouri, or Louisiana, or Alabama Etc9 should be in readiness for him, and may restore his family to the opulence10 which his virtues have lost to them. I suppose the time of the visit will be left to himself, as the death of Louis XVIII. which has probably taken place, or soon must do so, will produce a crisis in his own country from which he could not absent himself by a visit of compliment. ever and affectionately your’s
Th: Jefferson
RC (DLC: Monroe Papers); addressed: “James Monroe President of the US. Washington”; postmarked; endorsed by Monroe. Dft (DLC); on verso of reused address cover of Peter Perpignan to TJ, 26 Feb. 1823; mutilated at seal; endorsed by TJ. Not recorded in SJL.
The inclosed letter, not found, was John McLean to TJ, 28 Jan. 1824, and enclosure, which is recorded in SJL as received 1 Feb. 1824 from Washington. McLean had been appointed postmaster general by Monroe in 1823 and would soon correspond on other matters with TJ. McLean also wrote what was probably a similar letter to James Madison on 28 Jan., reading in part “The enclosed memorandum was sent to me by the writer, with a request, that I would present it to the Department of State. In a conversation I had with the President on the subject, he requested me to ask your advice, as to the propriety of granting the application” (RC in DLC: Madison Papers; printed in , 3:206). A copy of that enclosure, headed “Memorandum,” signed by Jacob Wagner, and dated Philadelphia, 15 Jan. 1824, was presumably also sent to TJ. In it, Wagner sought permission to publish volumes containing “the archives of the old confederation” in order to preserve them for posterity, remarking that “More than twenty years ago, they, together with the other contents of the Department of State, were saved by the writer alone, from a fire, which would otherwise have inevitably consumed them.” Anticipating concerns over making the Confederation Congress proceedings public, Wagner argued that “Doctor Franklin’s family have published his despatches; and Washington, whilst President, gave permission to Mr John Cary, to copy such parts of his own correspondence as he thought proper, for publication, which afterwards took place in London! Indeed the archives of the old government have never been regarded as secret—They were systematically perused by Dr Ramsay, Mr Coit, And others—By a standing rule of the Department they are open to the members of Congress. Notes even are allowed to be taken of their contents; but no extracts without leave.” As for their publication, Wagner continued, “Few persons can be so well acquainted with the arrangement of the papers, as the writer; he having acted in that Department during twelve years, and made indexes for some of the correspondence alluded to.” He concluded, “For the fidelity of his Conduct in the task, he has to remark, that at present he acknowledges no party, And that whilst he did, his official impartiality was so far approved, during the years of Mr Jefferson’s administration, that he was permitted to remain in the most Confidential of all the subordinate offices under government, And ultimately withdrew, against its wish” (MS in DLC: Madison Papers, in Wagner’s hand; printed in , 3:206–8).
Wagner was formerly editor of the Baltimore Federal Republican (the baltimore federalist). The death of louis xviii did not occur until 16 Sept. 1824.
1. Dft: “cannot.”
2. Remainder of sentence interlined in Dft.
3. Preceding six words interlined in Dft.
4. Preceding three words not underscored in Dft.
5. Text from “who appointed” to this point added in Dft at foot of text and keyed here with a caret.
6. Preceding two words interlined in Dft.
7. Sentence to this point reworked in Dft from “his word however is not to be.”
8. Word interlined in Dft in place of “mortal.”
9. Word interlined in Dft.
10. Word interlined in Dft in place of “competence.”
Index Entries
- Carey, John; editsOfficial Letters to the Honorable American Congress (G. Washington) search
- Coit, Mr.; and research in state papers search
- Confederation Congress; proposed publication of papers of search
- Congress, U.S.; and Lafayette’s visit to U.S. search
- Congress, U.S.; and state papers and public documents search
- Federalist party; partisans in search
- Federal Republican & Commercial Gazette (Baltimore newspaper) search
- Franklin, Benjamin; family of search
- Jefferson, Thomas; Opinions on; Lafayette search
- Jefferson, Thomas; Opinions on; political parties search
- Lafayette, Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, marquis de; finances of search
- Lafayette, Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, marquis de; visits U.S. search
- Louis XVIII, king of France; death of search
- Madison, James (1751–1836); correspondence of search
- McLean, John; and proposed publication of Confederation Congress papers search
- McLean, John; as postmaster general search
- McLean, John; letter from accounted for search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); and appointments search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); and Confederation Congress papers search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); and Lafayette’s visit to U.S. search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); letters to search
- newspapers; BaltimoreFederal Republican & Commercial Gazette search
- Official Letters to the Honorable American Congress (G. Washington) search
- politics; TJ on political parties search
- Ramsay, David (1749–1815); historical writings of search
- State Department, U.S.; clerks at search
- State Department, U.S.; papers of search
- United States; state papers and public documents search
- Wagner, Jacob; editor of BaltimoreFederal Republican search
- Wagner, Jacob; proposes to publish papers of Confederation Congress search
- Wagner, Jacob; TJ on search
- Washington, George; Official Letters to the Honorable American Congress search