From John Adams
Grosvenor Square June 6. 1786
Yesterday I received your Favour of 30. May with its Inclosures. You have Since that day no doubt received my answer to yours of the 11th., in which I agreed perfectly with you in the Propriety of Sending Mr. Lamb to Congress without Loss of time. I am content to send Mr. Randal with him but had rather he Should come to you first and then to me, and embark in London after we shall have had opportunity from his Conversation to learn as much as we can.
The Comte de Vergennes is undoubtedly right in his Judgment that Avarice and Fear are the only Agents at Algiers, and that we shall not have Peace with them the cheaper, for having a Treaty with the Sublime Porte. But is he certain we can ever at any Price have Peace, with Algiers, unless we have it previously with Constantinople? And do not the Turks from Constantinople, send Rovers into the Mediterranean? And would not even Treaties of Peace with Tunis, Tripoli, Algiers and Morocco be ineffectual for the Security of our Mediterranean Trade, without a Peace with the Porte? The Porte is at present the Theater of the Politicks of Europe, and commercial Information might be obtained there.
The first Question is, what will it cost us to make Peace with all five of them? Set it if you will at five hundred Thousand Pounds Sterling, tho I doubt not it might be done for Three or perhaps for two.
The Second Question is, what Damage shall we suffer, if we do not treat.
Compute Six or Eight Per Cent Insurance upon all your Exports, and Imports. Compute the total Loss of all the Mediterranean and Levant Trade.
Compute the Loss of half your Trade to Portugal and Spain.
These computations will amount to more than half a Million sterling a year.1
The third Question is what will it cost to fight them? I answer, at least half a Million sterling a year without protecting your Trade, and when you leave off fighting you must pay as much Money as it would cost you now for Peace.
The Interest of half a Million Sterling is, even at Six Per Cent, Thirty Thousand Guineas a year. For an Annual Interest of 30,000£ st. then and perhaps for 15,000 or 10,000, we can have Peace, when a War would sink us annually ten times as much.
But for Gods Sake dont let us amuse our Countrymen with any further Projects of Sounding. We know all about it, as much ever we can know, untill we have the Money to offer. We know if we Send an Ambassador to Constantinople, he must give Presents. How much, the Comte de Vergennes can tell you better than any Man in Europe.
We are fundamentally wrong. The first Thing to be done is for Congress to have a Revenue. Taxes [and] Duties must be laid on by Congress or the Assemblies and appropriated to the Payment of Interest. The Moment this is done we may borrow a Sum adequate to all our Necessities. If it is not done in my Opinion you and I as well as every other Servant of the United States in Europe ought to go home, give up all Points, and let all our Exports and Imports be done in European Bottoms. My Indignation is roused beyond all Patience to see the People in all the United States in a Torpor, and see them a Prey to every Robber, Pirate and Cheat in Europe.2 Jews and Judaizing Christians are now Scheeming to buy up all our Continental Notes at two or three shillings in a Pound, in order to oblige us to pay them at twenty shillings a Pound. This will be richer Plunder than that of Algerines or Loyds Coffee House. My dear friend Adieu,
RC (DLC); endorsed. FC (MHi: AMT); with minor variations not noted here. Recorded in SJL as received 5 July 1786 “by Dr. Bancroft.”
On this date Adams wrote to Jay: “I do myself the honour to enclose Papers, relative to African affairs, altho Mr. Jefferson has transmitted them before as it is possible his conveyance may fail. The Intelligence all tends to confirm what has been more than once written to you before, that 2 or 3 hundred thousand pounds sterling, will be necessary to obtain a perpetual Peace—it is very clear, that a Peace would be worth more than that sum annually, if you compute Insurance and the Levant, Mediterranean, Portuguese, and Spanish Trade.—If Congress should be impowered to lay on Taxes upon Navigation and Commerce or anything else to pay the Interest of the Money borrowed in Europe you may borrow what you will. If that is not done, the servants abroad had better be all recalled, and our exports and Imports all surrendered to foreign bottoms. Inclosed is a Bill now pending. The system of this Country is quite settled. It is with our states to unsettle it, by Acts of Retaliation or to acquiesce in it, as they judge for their own good” (Adams to Jay, 6 June 1786; MHi: AMT). This letter, with all of those written by TJ during May (12, 23, 27, and 31), was transmitted to Congress by Jay on 2 Aug. (JCC description begins Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789, ed. W. C. Ford and others, Washington, 1904–1937 description ends , xxxi, 466); these communications, their meaning sharpened by Adams’ blunt brevity and by their well-timed arrival in America on the eve of the meeting of the commissioners at Annapolis in September, gave substance to TJ’s hope that his and Adams’ letters would “give a new spirit to the proposition for investing Congress with the regulation of our commerce” (TJ to Carmichael, 5 May 1786).
1. This sentence is in RC, but not in FC.
2. In the margin of RC opposite this sentence, William Stephens Smith wrote: “18.104.22.168.22.214.171.124.9.10.-W.S.S.” See Smith to TJ, 21 May 1786, where it is made plain that TJ had counselled Smith always to count to ten before losing his temper. John Adams probably was unaware of the playful liberty that the secretary of legation had taken with his letter.