George Washington Papers

Colonel Heman Swift to George Washington, 5 April 1781

From Colonel Heman Swift

Wethersfeild [Conn.] April 5th 1781.

Sir,

I expected before this time to have been able to transmit to Your Excellency some further and more interesting intelligence of Mr Lee’s character and Circumstances whilst in New York, altho’ it is a generally received opinion that he is one of Sir Harry’s emissaries, yet no unequivocal or Substantial evidence of the matter can be obtain’d.

The Civil authority have commenced a Suit against him upon a Charge of Forgery, and it appears to be the wish of every person that if he be really a Spy, that he may be detected in his Villany.1

I beg leave to inform Your Excellency that a number of men of the Town of Glastenbury who have been employed in driving Teams in the Army have the winter past return’d and bro’t home with them a number of peices of valuable Cloath which the people are of opinion (from the circumstances of the persons) must have been stolen from the public; among which are about 35 Yds of superfine broad Cloath, some Linnen &c. &c. &c. The Inhabitants from a desire of detecting them if they should appear guilty, have made application to me to be inform’d whether the public Stores have been robbed; I was unable to give them the necessary information, but for myself am fully convinced that the Articles were stolen from the public, or from some private Gentleman with the Army: I, therefore, tho’t it my duty to give your Excellency this information,2 And have the honor to be, Your Excellency’s, Most Obt Servt

Heman Swift

LS, DLC:GW.

1For an earlier report about Lee, see Swift to GW, 22–31 March.

2GW replied to Swift from headquarters at New Windsor on 16 April: “On the receipt of your favor of the 5th I enquired whether the public store had been robbed of the Articles you mention as being found upon the Teamsters—I am informed it has not.

“I am sorry to say that the Recruits from Connecticut yet come in very slowly, and I fear except prospects are much mended since I was at Hartford that few may be expected—You will be pleased to inform me what were the numbers at the different places of rendezvous, by the last accounts which you had been able to collect” (Df, in Tench Tilghman’s writing, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW). GW had been in Hartford on 16 and 17 March (see GW to Rochambeau, 16 March, n.1). Swift replied to GW on 24 April.

Index Entries