To Major General Steuben
New Windsor 1st July 1779
I have been favoured with four letters from you three of the 22d and one of the 27th.1
One of them incloses a representation from the Gentlemen in your department, requesting some additional privileges, in consideration of the additional trouble incident to the extensive duties of their offices—Their request appears to me so reasonable that I shall immediately take measures to have them allowed.
For each Sub & Brigade Inspector a horsemans tent—to transact their business in—& small waggon or a pack horse to carry their baggage books and necessary papers—Blank books, paper and candles adequate to the necessary purposes of the office—The liberty of taking from the line two or three intelligent sergeants to act as Clerks, to do duty with their regiments as usual in time of action—The privilege of drawing on extraordinary occasions only & for temporary purposes—a horse from the public stables.
For each sub Inspector three—rations erday & forage for three horses.
For each Brigade Inspector—Two Rations erday & forage for three horses—The matter of rations and forage will demand the sanction of Congress to whom I will write on the subject.2 With respect to the exercise of the commands to which they are respectively intitled: whenever they conceive occasion may require it—it appears to me that this is placed upon its proper footing in the institution of the department and I cannot think it for the good of the service to recommend an alteration. If it should be left to the discretion of the inspectors they may prefer a command in their regiments, when it may interfere with the duties of their office: which require that in time of action they should assist their Generals in the execution of the field manœuvres3—I do not mean to suppose that this would happen—but every institution ought to be consistent with itself and not to authorise even a possibility of one part clashing with another. It is not my intention to preclude the Gentlemen from opportunities of command; but I am of opinion the occasions of exercising it ought to be determined by the officer commanding the army the division or the brigade to which they are attached.
The proposals towards a monthly inspection contained in their representation & your letter of the 29th appear in general to be very eligible and shall be substantially adopted4—A general order will be immediately framed for this purpose. It will comprehend the other regulations you recommend.5
I agree with you as to the impropriety of such numerous guards and the necessity of ordering them to join their regiments in time of alarm; and I disapprove of Commissioned officers exercising the civil functions you mention. I shall take measures to remedy these abuses. The other matters you suggest shall be duly attended to.
Your recommendation of Mr Galvan confirms the opinion I entertained of his talents. If Mr Ternant has resigned and no other person has been employed in his place, I should have only one objection to Mr Galvan succeeding him, which is that according to the establishment of your department, the appointment would naturally devolve on an officer already in the line. I shall however give the matter further consideration and in the mean time shall be obliged to you to endeavour to ascertain Mr Ternant’s resignation.6
I shall be obliged to you for a sight of his work concerning regulations for the cavalry.7
Df, in Alexander Hamilton’s writing, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. The dateline of the draft manuscript is in the writing of Richard Kidder Meade.
1. None of these four letters from Steuben to GW have been found.
3. GW is referring to the establishment of the Department of Inspector General by Congress on 18 Feb., and especially the regulation that reads “all the officers of the inspectorship having appointments in the line, shall retain their rights of command, succession, and promotion, in the same manner as if they had not assumed the office. But as the duties of this department are sufficient to employ their whole time, they are to suspend the exercise of their respective commands, except on particular occasions, when the Commander in Chief, or commanding officer in a detachment, may deem it necessary to invest them with command. They are to be exempted from all common camp and garrison duty, that they may attend the more carefully to those of the inspection; and in time of action they are to be employed in assisting in the execution of the field manœuvres” (JCC, description begins Worthington Chauncey Ford et al., eds. Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. 34 vols. Washington, D.C., 1904–37. description ends 13:198; see also James Duane to GW, 3 Jan., and n.1 to that document, and General Orders, 27 April).
6. Lt. Col. Jean-Baptiste Ternant, inspector of the troops in South Carolina and Georgia, did not resign. For William Galvan’s uneven military career and life, which ended in suicide, see Henry Laurens to GW, 29 Aug. 1778, n.4.
7. For what may be Ternant’s cavalry regulations, available only in manuscript at the time of GW’s request, see Regulations for the Order and Discipline of the Volunteer Army, of the United States of America: Containing, All that is requisite to be learned for a private soldier … to which is added, Instructions for the Exercise of the Light Horse, never before published (Baltimore, 1794), 21–29; see also Joseph R. Riling, Baron von Steuben and his Regulations (Philadelphia, 1966), 19.