Resolutions Authorizing an Interstate Compact on
Navigation and Jurisdiction of the Potomac
December 28th. 1784
Resolved that the Commissioners or any two of them appointed on the 28th. day of June last1 to concert with Commissioners on the part of Maryland, regulations touching the navigation and jurisdiction of the Potowmac, be further authorized ⟨to unite⟩ with the said commissioners in representing to the State of Pennsylvania, that it is in contemplation of the ⟨said⟩ two States to promote the clearing and extending the navigation of ⟨the⟩ Potowmac from tide-water upwards as far as the same may be found practicable; to open a convenient road from the head of such navigation to the waters running into the Ohio; and to render these waters navigable as far as may be necessary & proper: that the said Work will require great expence which may not be repaid, unless a free use be secured to the said States & their Citizens, of the Waters of the Ohio and its branches, so far as the same lie within the limits of Pennsylvania: that as essential advantages will accrue from such works to a considerable portion of the said State, it is thought reasonable that the Legislature thereof should by some previous act engage that for the encouragement of the said works all articles of produce or merchandize which may be conveyed to or from either of the said two States, through either of the said rivers within the limits of Pennsylvania, to or from any place without the said limits, shall pass throughout free from all duties or tolls whatsoever, other than such tolls as may be established and be necessary for reimbursing expences incurred by the State or its Citizens in clearing, or for defraying the expence of preserving the navigation of the said rivers; And that no articles imported into the State of Pennsylvania through the channel or channels or any part thereof to be opened as aforesaid and vended or used within the said State, shall be subject to any duties or imposts other than such articles would be subject to if imported into the said State thro’ any other channel whatsoever; And it is further resolved that in case a joint representation in behalf of this State and of Maryland shall be rendered by circumstances unattainable, the said Commissiers. or any two of them may of themselves make such representations on the subject ⟨to the State of Pennsylvania,⟩ as will in such event become proper; and that in either event they report their proceedings to the next General Assembly.
Resolved that a Copy of the above Resolutions be transmitted forthwith by the Executive to the State of Maryland.
Ms, FC (Vi). In JM’s hand, and later docketed by him. The FC was used for the version printed in JHDV description begins Journal of the House of Delegates of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Begun and Held at the Capitol, in the City of Williamsburg. Beginning in 1780, the portion after the semicolon reads, Begun and Held in the Town of Richmond. In the County of Henrico. The journal for each session has its own title page and is individually paginated. The edition used is the one in which the journals for 1777–1786 are brought together in two volumes, with each journal published in Richmond in either 1827 or 1828 and often called the “Thomas W. White reprint.” description ends , Oct. 1784, p. 91. Additions made by the General Assembly are printed here within angle brackets.
1. The commissioners appointed exactly ten months earlier were Alexander Henderson, JM, George Mason, and Edmund Randolph. They had not met to carry out their earlier assignment, which was now considerably enlarged. An administrative blunder almost nullified the efforts made in Mar. 1785 to clarify the rights of Virginia and Maryland citizens regarding river commerce and fishing (Brant, Madison description begins Irving Brant, James Madison (6 vols.; Indianapolis and New York, 1941–61). description ends , II, 375–76). The Virginia commissioners—Henderson and Mason—made their report on 28 Mar. 1785 (Rutland, Papers of George Mason, II, 814–21), while Mason explained the circumstances and outcome of the Mount Vernon conference to JM in his letter of 9 Aug. 1785. The interstate agreement was a hopeful sign, and in one sense this meeting was the embryo of the Federal Convention of 1787.