Instruction to Virginia Delegates in re Ship “Cormorant,” 26–27 June 1783
Instruction to Virginia Delegates
in re ship “Cormorant”
MS (NA: PCC, No. 137, II, 729). Docketed: “Resolution of genl Assembly of Virginia 26 June 1783 Read 23 July Referred so far as relates to the offer of the Ship Cormorant, to the Agent of Marine to report.”
Editorial Note
Unsigned by John Beckley, clerk of the House of Delegates, or by William Drew, clerk of the Senate, this instruction varies in form from that of the instructions usually sent by the Virginia General Assembly to its delegates in Congress. On the FC of the entire document in the Virginia State Library the signatures of both clerks appear, that of Drew beneath his penned notation, “1783 June 27th./ Agreed to by the Senate.” Omitted from the copy below was a directive to the “Commissioners superintending the defence of Chesapeake Bay,” not involving business with Congress (his letter of 4 July 1783 to the Virginia delegates (q.v.).
, May 1783, pp. 86, 90). Governor Harrison probably enclosed the present instruction inResolved that the Commissioners superintending the defence of Cheasepeake Bay1 be directed to sell all the armed vessels belonging to the public except the boats Liberty & Patriot2 in such manner as they shall think most advantagious first making an offer of the ship Cormorant to Congress3
1. The three commissioners appointed according to the provisions of “An act for defending and protecting the trade of Chesapeake bay,” adopted by the Virginia General Assembly on 1 July 1782, were Paul Loyall, Colonel Thomas Newton, Jr., and Thomas Brown ( , XI, 43; , III, 297, n. 102, 448–49; , VI, 278, n. 3; 292, n. 2).
2. Lack of money for sailors’ wages and for refitting these two vessels delayed the beginning of their mission against smugglers until the spring of 1786 ( , II, 83; 84, n. 7; V, 384, n. 5; , May 1783, pp. 91, 93; , III, 22, 93, 108, 125, 345, 535).
3. The “Cormorant,” which the French had captured from the British in October 1781 and sold to Virginia, was also far from ready for use on Chesapeake Bay, even though she had a copper-sheathed hull and mounted twenty guns. Paul Loyall reported to Governor Harrison early in the summer of 1782 that, being “totally unfit,” she probably “wou’d never remove on that service from Appomattox River” ( , III, 268–69). See also , IV, 44, n. 5; 341, n. 5; 356; 361, n. 33; V, 279, n. 3.
The resolution having been referred on 23 July to Robert Morris, agent of marine, he recommended on 5 August that Virginia’s offer be declined on the grounds of lack of money and of the inadvisability of Congress’ providing for a “marine” until “the several states shall grant such funds for the construction of ships, docks and naval arsenals, and for the support of the naval service, as shall enable the United States to establish their marine upon a permanent and respectable footing.” Congress agreed to this report (Motion of Delegates, 28 July; Harrison to Delegates, 19 Sept.; Delegates to Harrison, 4 Oct. 1783.
, XXIV, 444, n. 1, 486). See also