Defeated for Election to Virginia House of Delegates, [24 April] 1777
Defeated for Election to Virginia
House of Delegates
[24 April 1777]
In the election of Delegates to the Legislature for the ensuing year (1777), he was an unsuccessful candidate. Previous to the Revolution the election of the County representatives was as in England, septennial, and it was as there, the usage, for the Candidates to recommend themselves to the voters, not only by personal solicitation, but by the corrupting influence of spirituous liquors, and other treats, having a like tendency. Regarding these as equally inconsistent with the purity of moral and of republican principles; and anxious to promote, by his example, the proper reform, he trusted to the new views of the subject which he hoped would prevail with the people; whilst his competitors adhered to the old practice. The consequence was that the election went against him: his abstinence being represented as the effect of pride or parsimony.1
1. On 16 May 1777 the records that “A petition of sundry freeholders of the county of Orange, whose names are thereunto subscribed, was presented to the House, and read; setting forth, that Mr. Charles Porter, one of the candidates at the election of delegates for the said county, on the 24th of April last, did, contrary to an ordinance of Convention [ , IX, 57], make use of bribery and corruption during the said election, and praying that the said election may be set aside.” The next day, Bolling Stark, chairman of the Committee of Privileges and Elections to which this petition had been referred, pointed out that the proper course would be for the memorialists and Porter to examine witnesses before at least two justices of Orange County and return the depositions to the committee. Neither the petition nor evidence that a hearing took place has been found. On 9 June, however, the House of Delegates rejected the plea of the petition for lack of proof to sustain the allegations of bribery and corruption ( , May 1777, pp. 14, 18, 67). About two weeks before the House of Delegates took this adverse action, the Orange County Court on 29 May 1777 nominated JM and his father and fourteen other men “Justices of the Peace and also of Oyer & Terminer” (Orange County Minute Book, No. 2, p. 62). JM declined the office. In the mid-1780’s, when JM was a member of the House of Delegates, Porter was the other representative of Orange County. Charles Porter (ca. 1741–1791), a tavern keeper from 1766 to 1772, was the owner of the Tudor Hall plantation in Orange County by the time of the Revolution. At its outset he was a lieutenant of militia but shared in the siege of Yorktown in 1781 as a colonel of militia. He served as a member of the House of Delegates, 1777–1779 and 1784–1789 (Orange County Order Book, No. 7, p. 396; Order Book, No. 8, p. 230, and passim, microfilm in Virginia State Library; Earl G. Swem and John W. Williams, eds., Register of the General Assembly, pp. 4, 6, 9, 20, 22, 24; W. W. Scott, History of Orange County, pp. 75, 136). When writing the second sentence of this statement, JM evidently forgot that the British Septennial Act of 1716 did not extend to the province of Virginia. The royal governor, at his pleasure, could dissolve the House of Burgesses and call for a new election.