Washington Mar. 29. 1806
Your second letter of Feb. 24. relates to an incident which certainly I had not expected to see connected with my name. I do indeed recollect that some years ago, in a conversation at mr Strode’s, and with his family alone, it was mentioned by one of them, and in a very innocent way, that mr Washington had been lately there, and had asked mr Strode to shew him his farm. that in the course of their conversation he said that he had purchased the place from Genl. Lee. mr Strode observing that it was his property, that he had not sold it to Genl. Lee, & consequently that none but himself could make a title to it, mr Washington replied that he had bought it of Genl. Lee, had paid him for it, & should look to him for a title. this is correctly what I heard stated on that occasion. I do not remember that I ever repeated it to any body: but am sure, if I did, that it has been without addition or suppression, in the sanctuary of private society only, & in that unsuspecting way which characterises it’s conversations. that the agreement between yourself and mr Washington was a conditional one was not noted then, nor known to me till I now see it in mr Washington’s letter. you say I mentioned this incident to some acquaintance of mine. had you specified when, where, & to whom it might have enabled me to be more particular. to Colo. Porterfield, who has been the bearer of it to you, it could not have been; because, to my knowledge, I never saw him. however I recieve with entire satisfaction the additional information of mr Washington. it furnishes certainly an important feature in the transaction, and places it’s fairness on solid ground.
I mentioned in a letter to mr Walker that “a single incident only on your part, at our meeting, I had considered as not right“ this is the only expression meant for that incident. it became quite unimportant, because not noticed at the time, and would require too many recollections, & too long a recapitulation for the bounds of a letter. unimportant as it is however, I shall state it to you with frankness, if you shall desire it whenever we may happen to meet. I return you mr Strode’s and mr Washington’s letters, & salute you with respect & consideration.
P.S. Since writing the above, business has brought mr Strode to this place. to be certain of the correctness of my own recollection I spoke with him on the subject. he states that when he remonstrated on the singularity of the sale of his place without his consent, mr Washington replied with emphasis ‘Sir, Genl Lee is obliged to make me a title to it, for I have bought it of him, have paid him for it, and he must make me a right.’ of this mr Strode offers to give either his certificate, or his oaths, and from these words he understood, as every one would, that it was an absolute sale. nor is this inconsistent with mr Washington’s letter. he therein states indeed that the bargain was conditional. but he does not say that he mentioned that circumstance to mr Strode. possibly he might not then think it necessary to detail to him all the particulars of his bargain with you. if so, the first silence as to the circumstance of a conditional sale seems to have originated with him, rather than with mr Strode; but certainly not with me.
April. 17. 1806. This letter has been detained for a private conveyance rather than trust it to the post. it will accordingly be committed to Dr. Jones who will go about the 22d. inst. but who will know nothing of it’s contents. I yesterday recieved a letter from mr Strode written since his return home, in which he says ‘I give you the most solemn assurances that mr Samuel Washington told me that Genl Lee had sold him the place whereon I reside, and that Lee was obliged to make him a conveyance for the same, & bound what he said by the most solemn asseveration and that this fact shall be fully established I pledge my most sacred honor.’
DLC: Papers of Thomas Jefferson.