James Monroe to Thomas Jefferson, [received 11] December 1823
From James Monroe
Washington Decr 1823. [received 11 Dec. 1823]
Dear Sir
Shortly after the receipt of yours of the 24th of October, & while the subject treated in it, was under consideration, the Russian minister, drew the attention of the govt to the same subject, tho’ in a very different sense, from that in which it had been done by Mr Canning. Baron Tuyll, announcd in an official letter, and as was understood by order of the Emperor, that having heard that the republic of Columbia had appointed a minister to Russia, he wishd it to be distinctly understood that he would not1 receive him, nor would he receive any minister from any of the new govts de facto, of which the new world had been recently the theatre. On another occasion, he observ’d, that the Emperor had seen with great satisfaction, the declaration of this govt, when these new govts were recognized, that it was the intention of the U States, to remain neutral. He gave this intimation for the purpose of expressing the wish of his master, that we would persevere in the same policy. He communicated soon afterwards, an extract of a letter from his govt, in which the conduct of the allied powers, in regard to Naples, Spain, & Portugal, was reviewed, and their policy explain’d, distinctly avowing their determination, to crush all revolutionary movments, & thereby to preserve order in the civilized world. The terms “civilized world” were probably intended to be applied to Europe only, but admited an application to this hemisphere also. These communications were recievd as proofs of candour, & a friendly disposition to the U States, but were nevertheless answer’d, in a manner equally explicit, frank, & direct, to each point. In regard to neutrality it was observ’d, when that sentimt was dclard, that the other powers of Europe had not taken side with Spain—that they were then neutral—if they should change their policy, the state of things, on which our neutrality was declar’d, being alterd, we would not be bound by that declaration, but might change our policy also. Informal notes, or rather a proces verbal, of what passed in conference, to such effect, were exchangd between Mr Adams & the Russian minister, with an understanding however that they should be held confidential.
When the character of these communications, of that from Mr Canning, & that from the Russian minister, is considerd, & the time when made, it leaves l[i]ttle doubt, that some project against the new govts, is contemplated. In what form is uncertain. It is hoped that the sentiments expressd in the message, will give a check to it. We certainly meet, in full extent, the proposition of Mr Canning, & in the mode to give it the greatest effect. If his govt makes a similar decln, the project will, it may be presumd, be abandoned. By taking [the?] step here, it is done in a manner more conciliatory with, & respectful to Russia, & the other powers, than if taken in England, and as it is thought with more cr[e]dit to our govt. Had we mov’d in the first instance in England, separated as she is in part, from those powers, our union with her, being masked, might have producd irritation, with them. we know that Russia, dreads a connection between the U States & G. Britain, or harmony in policy. moving on our own ground, the apprehension that unless she retreats, that effect may be producd, may be a motive with her for retreating. Had we mov’d in England, it is probable, that it would have been inferrd that we acted under her influence, & at her instigation, & thus have lost credit as well with our southern neighbours, as with the allied powers.
There is some danger that the British govt, when it sees the part we have taken, may endeavour to throw the whole burden on us, and profit, in case of such interposition of the allied powers, of her neutrality, at our expense. but I think that this would be impossible after what has passd on the subject; besides it does not follow, from what has been said, that we should be bound to engage in the war, in such event. Of this intimations may be given, should it be necessary. A messenger will depart for Engld with despatches for Mr Rush in a few days; who will go on to St Petersbg with others to Mr Middleton. And considering the crisis, it has occurr’d, that a special mission, of the first consideration from the country, directed to Engld in the first instance, with power, to attend, any congress, that may be conven’d, on the affrs of So Am: or Mexico,2 might have the happiest effect. you shall hear from me further on this subject—
RC (DLC: TJ Papers, 225:40252–3); mutilated and edge torn; partially dated; endorsed by TJ as a Dec. 1823 letter from “Monroe James” received 11 Dec. 1823 and so recorded in SJL.
Following a meeting with John Quincy Adams, Diederik Jacob van Tuyll van Serooskerken (baron tuyll), the Russian envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary to the United States, announcd in an official letter dated 16 Oct. 1823 Russia’s intention not to receive agents from any newly formed South American governments (Worthington C. Ford, “Some Original Documents on the Genesis of the Monroe Doctrine,” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, 2d ser., 15 [1902]: 394–5, 400). For the declaration of this govt, see Monroe to TJ, 14 Mar. 1822, and note. The extract of a letter from his govt was taken from Karl Robert von Nesselrode to Tuyll, 30 Aug. 1823 (printed in Ford, “John Quincy Adams and the Monroe Doctrine,” American Historical Review 8 [1902]: 30–2). For Monroe’s recent annual message to Congress, see Monroe to TJ, 4 Dec. 1823, and note.
1. Word interlined.
2. Manuscript: “Mexco.”
Index Entries
- Adams, John Quincy; as secretary of state search
- Alexander I, emperor of Russia; and South American republics search
- Canning, George; British foreign minister search
- Colombia, Republic of; recognition of search
- Congress, U.S.; J. Monroe’s messages to search
- Europe; revolutions in search
- Great Britain; and Monroe Doctrine search
- Great Britain; and U.S. search
- Mexico; and Monroe Doctrine search
- Middleton, Henry (1770–1846); as minister plenipotentiary to Russia search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); and Monroe Doctrine search
- Monroe, James (1758–1831); letters from search
- Monroe Doctrine; J. Monroe’s annual message to Congress (1823) search
- Naples, kingdom of (later Kingdom of the Two Sicilies); revolution in search
- Nesselrode, Karl Robert von search
- Portugal; and revolutions in Europe search
- Rush, Richard; as minister plenipotentiary to Great Britain search
- Russia; and Great Britain search
- Russia; and Latin America search
- Russia; and revolutions in Europe search
- Russia; and U.S. search
- South America; and European powers search
- South America; and Monroe Doctrine search
- South America; and U.S. search
- Spain; revolution in search
- Tuyll van Serooskerken, Diederik Jacob van; as Russian minister to U.S. search
- United States; and Great Britain search
- United States; and Monroe Doctrine search
- United States; and South American republics search