Thomas Jefferson Papers

From Thomas Jefferson to Gideon Granger, 13 August 1800

To Gideon Granger

Aug. 13. 1800.

Dear Sir

I recieved with great pleasure your favor of June 4. and am much comforted by the appearance of a change of opinion in your state: for tho’ we may obtain, & I believe shall obtain a majority in the legislature of the US attached to the preservation of the Federal constitution according to it’s obvious principles & those on which it was known to be recieved, attached equally to the preservation to the states of those rights unquestionably remaining with them, friends to the freedom of religion, freedom of the press, trial by jury1 & to economical government, opposed to standing armies, paper systems, war, & all2 connection other than of commerce with any foreign nation, in short, a majority firm in all those principles which we have espoused and the federalists have opposed uniformly; still should the whole body of New England3 continue in opposition to these principles of government, either knowingly or through delusion, our government will be a very uneasy one. it can never be harmonious & solid, while so respectable a portion of it’s citizens support principles which go directly to a change of the federal constitution, to sink the state governments, consolidate them into one, and to monarchize that. our country is too large to have all it’s affairs directed by a single government. public servants at such a distance, & from under the eye of their constituents, will, from the circumstance of distance, be unable to administer & overlook all the details necessary for the good government of the citizen; and the same circumstance by rendering detection impossible to their constituents, will invite the public agents to corruption, plunder & waste: and I do verily believe that if the principle were to prevail4 of a common law being in force in the US. (which principle possesses the general government at once of all the powers of the state governments, and reduces us to a single consolidated government) it would become the most corrupt government on the face of the earth. you have seen the practices by which the public servants have been able to cover their conduct, or, where that could not be done, the5 delusions by which they have varnished it for the eye of their constituents. what an augmentation of the field for jobbing, speculating, plundering, office-building & office hunting, would be produced by an assumption of all the state powers into the hands of the general government. the true theory of our constitution is surely the wisest & best, that the states are independant as to every thing within themselves, & united as to every thing respecting foreign nations. let the general government be once reduced to foreign concerns only, and let our affairs be disentangled from those of all other nations, except as to commerce which the merchants will manage the better, the more they are left free to manage6 for themselves, and our general government may be reduced to a very simple organization, & a very unexpensive one: a few plain7 duties to be performed by a few servants. but I repeat that this simple & economical mode of government can never be secured if the New England states continue to support the contrary system. I rejoice therefore in every appearance of their returning to those principles which I had always imagined to be almost innate in them. in this state a few persons were shaken by the XYZ duperies. you saw the effect of it in our last8 Congressional representation chosen under their influence. this experiment on their credulity is now seen into, and our next representation will be as republican as it has heretofore been. on the whole we hope that by a part of the Union having held on to the principles of the constitution, time has been given to the states to recover from the temporary phrenzy into which they had been decoyed, to rally round the constitution & to rescue it from the destruction with which it had been threatened even at their own hands. I see copied from the American Mercury two Nos. of a paper signed Don Quixot, most excellently adapted to introduce the real truth to the minds even of the most prejudiced. I would with great pleasure have written the letter you desire on behalf of your friend; but there are existing circumstances which render a letter from me to that magistrate as improper as it would be unavailing. I shall be happy on some more fortunate occasion to prove to you my desire of serving your wishes.

I sometime ago recieved a letter from a mr Mc.Gregory of Derby in your state.9 it is written with such a10 degree of good sense & appearance of candor as entitle it to an answer. yet the writer being entirely unknown [to me, and the] stratagems of the times very multifarious, I have thought [it best to avail] myself of your friendship & inclose the answer to you. you [will see it’s] nature. if you find from the character of the person to whom it is addressed that no improper use would probably be made of it, be so good as to seal & send it. otherwise suppress it.

How will the vote of your state & R.I. be as to A. & P.

I am with great & sincere esteem Dear Sir Your friend & servt

Th: Jefferson

RC (MHi: Winthrop Collection); torn, with missing words supplied in brackets from PrC; addressed: “Gideon Granger esq. Suffield Connecticut.” PrC (DLC). Enclosure: TJ to Uriah McGregory, 13 Aug. 1800.

Letter you desire: Granger requested that TJ write a letter to Arthur St. Clair on behalf of Calvin Pease, his brother-in-law (Granger to TJ, 4 June 1800).

TJ’s letter from Uriah McGregory of Derby is printed at 19 July 1800.

A. & P.: John Adams and Charles C. Pinckney.

1Preceding three words interlined.

2TJ here canceled “political.”

3TJ here canceled “remain.”

4Preceding three words interlined.

5TJ here canceled “deceptions.”

6Word interlined in place of “act.”

7Word interlined in place of “simple.”

8Word interlined.

9Preceding three words interlined.

10Preceding two words interlined in place of “that.”

Index Entries