To Sir John Sinclair
Philadelphia Aug. 24. 1791.
I am to acknolege the reciept of your two favors of Dec. 25. and May 14. with the pamphlets which accompanied them, and to return you my thanks for them. The Corn law, I percieve, has not passed in the form you expected. My wishes on that subject were nearer yours than you imagined. We both in fact desired the same thing for different reasons, respecting the interests of our respective countries, and therefore justifiable in both. You wished the bill so moulded as to encourage strongly your national agriculture. The clause for warehousing foreign corn tended to lessen the confidence of the farmer in the demand for his corn. I wished the clause omitted that our corn might pass directly to the country of the consumer, and save us the loss of an intermediate deposit, which it can illy bear.—That no commercial arrangements between Gr. Britain and the U.S. have taken place, as you wish should be done, cannot be imputed to us. The proposition has surely been often enough made; perhaps too often. It is a happy circumstance in human affairs that evils which are not cured in one way, will cure themselves in some other.—We are now under the first impression of the news of the king’s flight from Paris, and his recapture. It would be unfortunate were it in the power of any one man to defeat the issue of so beautiful a revolution. I hope and trust it is not, and that for the good of suffering humanity all over the earth, that revolution will be established and spread thro’ the whole world.—I shall always be happy my dear Sir to hear of your health & happiness, being with sentiments of the most cordial esteem and respect Dear Sir your most obedt. humble servt,
I send you a small pamphlet on the subject of our commerce written by a very judicious hand.
PrC (DLC). RC sold by Charles Hamilton, Auction No. 102, 30 Jan. 1977 and reproduced in facsimile.
TJ was relieved because Parliament had passed the corn law without a clause allowing American wheat imported into Great Britain by British ships to be stored without charge in British warehouses (see TJ to Charles Carroll, 4 Apr. 1791, and notes). The small pamphlet TJ enclosed with this letter was Tench Coxe, A Brief Examination of Lord Sheffield’s Observations on the Commerce of the United States (Philadelphia, 1791), which was a rebuttal of Sheffield’s celebrated defense of the British mercantile system. By thus expressing his approval of Coxe’s pamphlet, which criticized British restrictions on American commerce and called for the passage of legislation to encourage the development of American manufacturing, TJ undoubtedly hoped the threat of American retaliation might help secure commercial concessions from the British government.