From George Gibson
Petersburg 5th. Febry 1781.
May It Please Your Excellency
Your favor of the 28th. ultimo did not come to hand before the 3rd. Inst. From its being folded into a small size or from the carelessness of the Bearer, it was found thrust in a letter from Your Excellency to A Gentleman of Dinwiddie County. I now do myself the Honor to transmit you a Return of the 1st Virginia State Regiment together with the Arms accoutrements Field equipage, Waggons, &c. being the State of the Regiment when we cross’d the Powtomack in September 1777 Also a return of the Arms we drew since the return of the Regiment to this State. I am sorry I had it not in my Power to send them sooner to you.
I was some time since honor’d with yours of the 14th. ultimo covering an Extract of a letter from His Excely. Genl. Washington which You desired might be communicated to the Officers of the two State Regiments. With the officers of the 2nd State Regiment I have not the least communication nor indeed am I acquainted with the Places of their residence. I am told Colo. Brent is at present at Annapolis Maryld. The greatest Part of the officers of the 1st. State Regiment are now in a service which from Its nature is truly Irksome. The Command of undisciplined troops, who as soon as they are taught their duty, are relieved by others with whom the Officers have the same trouble, So that in fact they are little better than Dril Serjeants. From these considerations it was with reluctance the Gentlemen accepted their appointments, and I am confident Principle alone induceth them to continue. I thought it therefore prudent to Keep them ignorant of the Determination of His Excelly. respecting them until they shall be relieved from their present engagements or until I have your positive Orders for making them acquainted therewith.
As I am unacquainted with the Acts of Assembly respecting the reduction of these regiments I shall esteem It a particular favor if You will please to acquaint me whether the Officers are to have the Emoluments of Half pay, Lands, Exemption from draughts.
I hope you will pardon the freedom I take in addressing you on this subject.
I have the Honor to be with the greatest Respect Your Obedt. Huml. Servt.,
RC (Vi); addressed and endorsed. Enclosures missing.
TJ’s letters to Gibson of 14 and 28 Jan., here acknowledged, have not been found; the former evidently enclosed An extract of a letter from … Genl. Washington to TJ of 28 Dec. 1780, q.v., concerning Continental commissions for officers on the state establishment. See also TJ’s letter to Gibson, preceding, and Advice of Council, 6 Feb. 1781, below. The Gentleman of Dinwiddie has not been identified. Since the letter to Gibson was carried by the same person who bore the letter to the “Gentleman of Dinwiddie,” the latter was probably written ca. 28 Jan. 1781. It may, therefore, have been the letter to Steuben of 29 Jan., since Steuben was then at Petersburg. It may also have been the letter to Robert Lawson of 31 Jan., since he was stationed in that vicinity. But most likely it was TJ’s letter to John Banister of 30 Jan., for Banister, as county lieutenant of Dinwiddie, was certainly the leading citizen of the county and the one about whom such an allusion as that made by Gibson would have been readily understood by TJ.