Alexander Hamilton Papers

To Alexander Hamilton from Gouverneur Morris, 10 April 1792

From Gouverneur Morris

London 10 April 1792.

Dear Hamilton.

I din’d the Day before Yesterday tête a tête with the Russian Minister Count Woranzow1 who is a very sensible and well inform’d Man. In the Course of an Interesting Conversation after Dinner your Name was Mention’d and he exprest a Desire to see your various Reports to Congress. These he means to transmit to his Brother who is the Minister of Commerce in Russia in Order to undeceive him with Respect to the United States. You will not only oblige me but do a very useful Thing if you will transmit those Reports with any other useful Information in an Envelope directed to the Count de Woranzow Minister plenipo: from the Court of Russia. You can send it to the American Consul here to be deliverd but chuse a private Ship for the Conveyance.

The Count to shew the Importance of spreading such Information told me that when he came to this Country2 beleiving as he did in Mr Pitts Integrity he readily adopted the State given to him of our Country which was as poor and despicable as need be. He says that he is cur’d of his Confidence in Mr. Pitt having detected him in asserting most seriously upon his Honor and laying his Hand upon his Breast things which were absolutely false. But that the Impressions made with Respect to America still exist to our Prejudice in many Places. He says that Mr Pitt had at one time he beleives some Disposition to make a commercial Treaty with us but that the Arguments used by Lord Sheffield3 and the Indisposition of some of his Colleagues had changed this Intention. That he may have return’d lately towards his former Mode of thinking in Consequence of our prosperous Situation but that we should be very much on our Guard and especially against Corruption which is one of his usual Weapons. He says that Mr Pitt in the late Armament4 finding that he would not basely betray the Interest of his Sovereign had the Insolence to threaten him (thro a third Person) with the Loss of his Place. He replied in the same Way that he considered his Flatteries and Threats as equally contemptible That as to the Charge of intriguing with Opposition5 he neither avowd nor disavow’d any Thing being amenable only to his own Sovereign. But that supposing a british Minister to be so weak and vain as to compromise in the Parade of useless Armament the essential Interests of his Country and that Peace and good Understanding which he had been sent to cultivate between the two Nations it would best fulfill the Objects of his Appointment to counteract the Measures of such a Minister. The End of this curious kind of second Hand Dialogue was an Apology from Mr Pitt disavowing the first Message but in such Way as confirmd the Belief of it & therefore only shew’d the poorness of the Denial. Expede Herculem. This Anecdote will I think not be useless to you.

Adieu   I am always yours

Gouv Morris

ALS, Hamilton Papers, Library of Congress; LC, Gouverneur Morris Papers, Library of Congress.

1At this time the Russian Ambassador to the Court of St. James’s was Count Semen Romanovich Woronzow. For Morris’s account of his interview with Count Woronzow, see Morris, Diary of the French Revolution description begins Gouverneur Morris, A Diary of the French Revolution, ed. by Beatrix Cary Davenport (Boston, 1939). description ends , II, 409–10.

2Woronzow was in England as early as 1785.

3Lord Sheffield was the author of an influential defense of England’s navigation laws entitled Observations on the Commerce of the American States with Europe and the West Indies including the several articles of import and export; and on the tendency of a bill now depending in Parliament (London: J. Debrett, 1783). This book went through two editions in 1783 and four in 1784.

4After William Pitt failed in his attempt to use diplomacy to check Russian aggression against the Ottoman Empire, he ordered an increase in the British navy. This increase was known as “the Russian Armament.”

5Pitt’s proposal to commission additional ships for the British navy encountered opposition in Parliament. It is probably this “opposition” to which Woronzow referred in his conversation with Morris.

Index Entries