To Jonathan Nesbitt1
Copy: Library of Congress
Passy, Sept 29. 1779.
Capt. Conyngham has not been neglected. As soon as I heard of his arrival in England, I wrote to a friend to furnish him with money he might want, and to assure that he had never acted without a Commission. I have been made to understand in answer that there is not intention to prosecute him, and that he was accordingly removed from Pendennes Castle and put among the common Prisoners at Plimouth to take his Turn for Exchange the Congress hearing of the Threats to sacrifice him put 3 Officers in close Confinement to abide his fate, and acquainted Sir George Collier with their Determination, who probably wrote to the British Ministers.—2 I thank you for informing me what became of his first Commission. I Suppose I can now easily recover it, to produce on Occasion.— Probably the Date of that Taken with him being posterior to his Capture of The pacquet, made The Enemy think they had an advantage Against him.— But when the English Governement have encouraged our Sailors intrusted with our Vessels to betray that Trust, run away with the Vessels, and bring them into English Ports, giving such Traitors the Value as if good and lawful Prizes, it was foolish Imprudence in the British Commodore to talk of hanging one of our Captains for taking a Prize without Commission. I have the honour to be, with Great Esteem Sir
1. In answer to his of Sept. 22, above.
2. On July 17, in response to a plea from Ann Conyngham (see our annotation of her letter of Sept. 22) and a petition from the inhabitants of Philadelphia, Congress dispatched a letter to the commanding officer of the British fleet at New York, Sir George Collier (DNB). The resolution demanded that Conyngham be released or that an explanation be given for his ill-treatment. If no satisfactory answer was received by Aug. 1, the Marine Committee was empowered to take into custody as many persons as they thought proper to retaliate: JCC, XIV, 849–50. Collier’s curt reply (made through his secretary) declining to answer their “uncivil” demands is printed in Neeser, Conyngham, pp. 182–3. Congress responded by taking a British naval officer hostage (although BF claimed it took three hostages): Neeser, Conyngham, p. 184; JCC, XV, 1373; BF to Conyngham, Nov. 22, 1779 (Library of Congress).