To Thomas Cushing
ALS and copy:9 Public Record Office; draft: American Philosophical Society
London, June 1 1774
I received your respected Favour of March 31. with another of the same Date from the Committee. The latest of my Letters which had then come to your Hands was of Jany. 7. since which I have written several, viz. of Feb. 2 to yourself, and one of the same Date to the Committee. Of Feb. 15. containing a full Account of the Hearing on the Petition. Of March 22. with some Account of the intended Acts against our Province. Of April 2. with an Account of the Petitions presented by the Natives of America residing here. Of April 16. containing an Account of the Appointment of General Gage as Governor, and more Particulars of the intended Acts. And in the Course of last Month I sent you by various Conveyances, under Covers with only a Line or two, Copies of the Acts themselves, and other publick Papers and Pamphlets.1 I mention these Dates and Particulars that you may know if any of my Letters are missing. With this I inclose a List of your new Council, the Quebec Bill, an Abstract of the Resolutions for laying Duties in that Province, and some Newspapers containing the two Protests of the Lords,2 and a List of those who have voted against the Bills. Lord Chatham being ill at the time could not be present, or he would probably have voted on the same Side. He has since appeared in the House, and delivered his Sentiments fully on the American Measures: blam’d us for destroying the Tea, and for our Declarations of Independence on the Parliament; but condemn’d strongly the Measures taking here in consequence; and spoke honourably of our Province and People, and of their Conduct in the late War.3
Mr. Lee is gone to make the Tour of France and Italy, and probably will be absent near a Year. Just before his Departure he drew up at my Instance a kind of Answer to the Lords Committees Report, for which I furnished him with most of the Materials. I send a Copy of it.4 I had resign’d your Agency to him, expecting to leave England about the End of this Month; but on his Departure he has return’d me all the Papers, and I feel myself now under a kind of Necessity of continuing till you can be acquainted with this Circumstance, and have Time to give farther Orders.
I shall apply to Lord Dartmouth agreable to the Directions of the honourable Committee, and write to them fully as soon as I have his Lordship’s Answer.5
Your friendly Concern on my Account6 lest the Project for a Subscription Post Office in America should prove prejudicial to me, is very obliging; but you must have learnt before this time, that it was, when you wrote, superfluous, my Place having been taken from me the 31st of January preceding. As the Salary I received in that Office is now ceas’d, and I have been lately at near £200 Expence on the Province Account in various Ways, I am now oblig’d to request that some Means may be fallen upon of making me a Remittance here; for I have little Expectation that the Instruction will be recall’d on my Application. With great Esteem I have the Honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient and most humble Servant
Be pleased to present my Respects to the honourable House,7 and to the Gentlemen of the Committee.
Honourable Thomas Cushing Esqr
Notation: Benja Franklin Esqr London June. 1. 1774
9. The copy was presumably that enclosed in BF’s letter below, Sept. 15.
1. Cushing’s letter of March 31 is missing; by his letter of Jan. 7 BF probably meant that of Jan. 5 above. BF’s of Feb. 2 and his brief notes in May have all disappeared.
2. The Mass. Government Act provided for a council appointed by the King; on May 20 the Privy Council drew up a list of 36 members, of whom only five were carried over from the council elected in 1773: compare Mass. Acts and Resolves, XVIII, 705–6, and Acts Privy Coun., Col., V, 393. The Quebec bill, which became law on June 22 to take effect on May 1, 1775 (14 Geo. III, c. 83), provided for an appointed council to legislate with the governor, guaranteed French civil law and the position of the Catholic church, and extended the boundaries of the province westward to the Ohio and its confluence with the Mississippi. Reginald Coupland, The Quebec Act: a Study in Statesmanship (Oxford, 1925); see also Ian R. Christie and Benjamin W. Labaree, Empire or Independence, 1760–1776 … (New York, ), pp. 193–6. The “Resolutions for laying Duties,” adopted in the House of Commons on May 31, were the forerunner of the Quebec Revenue Act, for which see Gipson, British Empire, XIII, 165; BF discussed the duties in more detail in his letter to WF below, June 30. The two minority protests in the House of Lords were against the Mass. Government bill on May 11 and the Administration of Justice bill on the 18th: Force, 4 Amer. Arch., I, 93–5, 128–9.
3. Chatham’s speech on May 26, his first in two years, was in the debate on what became the Quartering Act. Public Advertiser, May 27, 1774. His reference to declarations of independence does not appear in the summary in Cobbett, Parliamentary History, XVII, 1353–6, or in the account in the Boston Evening-Post from which Gipson quotes at length: op. cit., XII, 131–2 n.
4. BF had told Cushing in his letter above, April 16, that he expected Lee’s trip to Italy to take only a few months; with his next letter, April 28, he enclosed the Lords’ report. Lee’s answer to it, with BF’s contributions, is discussed in the note above under May 30.
5. See the committee’s letter above, March 31. One of the grievances complained of there was the prohibition, to which BF refers in the next paragraph, on paying his salary. We have no evidence that he took up the grievances with Dartmouth, or answered the committee.
6. Doubtless in the missing letter of March 31.
7. By the time the letter arrived there was no House of Representatives. Gage dissolved the General Court on June 17, and it never reconvened in its old form.