To John Ross
MS not found; reprinted from William Temple Franklin, ed., Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Benjamin Franklin, LL.D F.R.S. &c., Quarto Edition, II, printed with separate title as The Private Correspondence of Benjamin Franklin, LL.D. F.R.S. &c. (London, 1817), p. 148.
London, Dec. 12, 1767.
The instruction you mention as proposed by a certain great man was really a wild one.6 The reasons you made use of against it were clear and strong, and could not but prevail. It will be time enough to show a dislike to the coalition when it is proposed to us. Meanwhile we have all the advantage in the agreement of taxation which our not being represented will continue to give us. I think indeed that such an event is very remote. This nation is indeed too proud to propose admitting American representatives into their parliament; and America is not so humble or so fond of the honour as to petition for it. In matrimonial matches ’tis said when one party is willing the match is half made, but where neither party is willing there is no great danger of their coming together. And to be sure such an important business would never be treated of by agents unimpowered and uninstructed; nor would government here act upon the private opinion of agents which might be disowned by their constituents.
The present ministry seem now likely to continue through this session;7 and this as a new election approaches, gives them the advantage of getting so many of their friends chosen as may give a stability to their administration. I heartily wish it, because they are all well disposed towards America. With sincere esteem, I am, dear sir, your affectionate friend and most obedient servant,
4. Not found.
5. Ross was re-elected to the Pa. Assembly as a representative from the city of Philadelphia in the annual elections on Oct. 1, 1767. 8 Pa. Arch., VII, 6062.
6. Neither the instruction nor the great man has been identified. The records of the Assembly offer no clue as to what scheme might have been suggested there to which Ross had offered objections. From what BF goes on to say it seems probable that someone, either in Pennsylvania or Great Britain, had been advocating a plan for colonial representation in the House of Commons. If so, BF was certainly correct in pointing out that the colonial agents would lack power to assent to any such arrangement.
7. See above, p. 331 n, for the rather significant changes which occurred in the Ministry in January 1768.