From Thomas Jefferson to William Dunbar, 25 May 1805
To William Dunbar
Washington May 25. 1805.
Dear Sir
Your several letters, with the portions of your journals forwarded at different times have been duly recieved; and I am now putting the journal into the hands of a person properly qualified, to extract the results of your observations, and the various interesting information contained among them, and bring them into such a compas as may be communicated to the legislature. not knowing whether you might not intend to make a map yourself of the course of the river; he will defer that to the last part of his work on the possibility that we may recieve it from yourself. Your observations on the difficulty of transporting baggage from the head of the Red river to that of the Arcansa, with the dangers from the seceding Osages residing on the last river have determined me to confine the ensuing mission to the ascent of the Red river to it’s source, & to descend the same river again, which will give an opportunity of better ascertaining that; which in truth, next to the Missouri, is the most interesting water of the Missisipi. you will accordingly recieve instructions to this effect from the Secretary at War. Dr. Hunter does not propose to take a part in this mission, and we suppose that mr George Davis, a deputy of mr Briggs’ will be the fittest person to take the direction of the expedition and Colo. Freeman as an assistant, & successor in case of accident to the principal. still these propositions are submitted to your controul, as being better acquainted with both characters. I write to Govr. Claiborne to endeavor to get a passport from the Marquis of Casa-Calvo for our party as a protection from any Spaniards who may be fallen in with on the route: and we offer to recieve one or two persons, to be named by him and subsisted by us1 into the party, as a proof that the expedition is merely scientific, and without any views to which Spain could take exception. the best protection against the Indians will be the authority to confer with them on the subject of commerce. such conferences should be particularly held with the Arcansas and Panis residing on the Red river, and every thing possible be done to attach them to us affectionately. in the present state of things between Spain & us, we should spare nothing to secure the friendship of the Indians within reach of her. While Capt. Lewis’s mission was preparing, as it was understood that his reliance for his longitudes must be on the Lunar observations taken, as at sea, with the aid of a timekeeper, and I knew that a thousand accidents might happen to that in such a journey as his, & thus deprive us of the principal object of the expedition, to wit, the ascertaining the geography of that river, I sat myself to consider whether in making observations at land, that furnishes no resource which may dispense with the timekeeper, so necessary at sea. it occurred to me that as we can always have a meridian at land, that would furnish what the want of it at sea obliges us to supply by the time keeper. supposing Capt Lewis then furnished with a meridian, & having the requisite tables & Nautical Almanac with him, 1. he might find the right ascension of the moon when on the meridian of Greenwich on any given day, then find by observation when the moon should attain that right ascension (by the aid of a known star) & measure her distance in that moment from his meridian. this distance would be the difference of longitude between Greenwich & the place of observation. Or 2dly. Observe the moon’s passage over his meridian & her right ascencion at that moment. see by the tables the time at Greenwich when she had that right ascencion: that gives her distance from the meridian of Greenwich when she was on his meridian. Or 3dly. observe the moon’s distance from his meridian at any moment, & her right ascension at that moment, & find from the tables her distance from the meridian of Greenwich when she had that right ascension, which will give the distance of the two meridians. this last process will be simplified by taking for the moment of observation that of an appulse of the moon and a known star, or when the moon & a known star are in the same vertical. I suggested this to mr Briggs, who considered it as correct & practicable and proposed communicating it to the Phil. society, but I observed that it was too obvious not to have been thought of before, and supposed it had not been adopted in practice because of no use at sea, where a meridian cannot be had, and where alone the nations of Europe had occasion for it. before his confirmation of the idea however, Capt Lewis was gone. in conversation afterwards with Baron Humboldt, he observed that the idea was correct, but not new, that I would find it in the 3d. vol. of Delalande; I recieved two days ago the 3d. & 4th. vols. of Montucla’s hist. of Mathematics, finished & edited by Delalande; and find in fact that Morin & Vanlangren in the 17th. century proposed observations of the moon on the meridian, but it does not appear whether they meant to dispense with the time keeper: but a meridian at sea being too impracticable, their idea was not pursued. the purpose of troubling you with these details is to submit to your consideration and decision whether any use can be made of them advantageously in our future expeditions, & particularly that up the Red river.
Your letter on the current of the Missisipi, and paper on the same subject, corrected at once my doubts on your theory of the current of that river. constant emploiment in a very different line, permits me to turn to philosophical subjects only when some circumstance forces them on my attention. no occurrence had called my mind to this subject particularly since I had first been initiated into the original Torricellian doctrine of the velocities at different depths being in the sub-duplicate ratio of the depths. and tho’ Buat had given me his book while at Paris, your letter was the first occasion of my turning to it, and getting my mind set to rights to a certain degree. there is a subsequent work by Bernard which is said to have furnished corrections and additions to Buat; but I have never seen it.
The work we are now doing, is, I trust, done for posterity, in such a way that they need not repeate it. for this we are much indebted to you not only for the labour & time you have devoted to it, but for the excellent method of which you have set the example, and which I hope will be the model to be followed by others. we shall delineate with correctness the great arteries of this great country: those who come after us will extend the ramifications as they become acquainted with them, and fill up the canvas we begin. with my acknolegements for your zealous aid in this business, accept my friendly salutations & assurances of great esteem & respect.
Th: Jefferson
PoC (DLC); at foot of first page: “Mr. Dunbar.”
The person properly qualified with whom TJ placed Dunbar’s journals has not been identified. Dunbar sent them to the president in installments throughout February and March 1805. TJ presented to Congress on 19 Feb. 1806 a condensed, narrative version, to which was appended a brief table of “Meteorological observations” consisting of daily thermometer readings and weather observations. This version, together with accounts by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark and John Sibley, were subsequently published as Message from the President of the United States, Communicating Discoveries Made in Exploring the Missouri, Red River and Washita, by Captains Lewis and Clark, Doctor Sibley, and Mr. Dunbar (Washington, D.C., 1806). Using the astronomical observations made by Dunbar and George Hunter, Nicholas King published a map of the Ouachita River, a copy of which TJ sent to Dunbar in early 1806. Dunbar sent his own “sketch of the Washita river” to TJ the previous November (Dunbar to TJ, 10 Nov. 1805; TJ to Dunbar, 12 Jan. 1806). For the disposition and publication of Dunbar’s and Hunter’s journals, see Trey Berry, Pam Beasley, and Jeanne Clements, eds., The Forgotten Expedition, 1804-1805: The Louisiana Purchase Journals of Dunbar and Hunter (Baton Rouge, 2006), 219-22.
seceding Osages: see Pierre Chouteau’s letters to TJ of 12 Feb., 2 Mch., and 20 Apr.
Colo. Freeman: TJ’s use of the title “Colo.” led Dunbar to mistakenly assume he was referring to Lieutenant Colonel Constant Freeman, the U.S. army commander at New Orleans. Dunbar later learned that surveyor Thomas Freeman would lead the Red River expedition of 1806 (Dunbar to TJ, 18 Aug. 1804; Dearborn to Dunbar, 8 Nov. 1805, FC in Lb in DNA: RG 107, MLS; Dunbar to TJ, 8 Oct., 17 Dec. 1805; TJ to Dunbar, 12 Jan. 1806).
I write to Govr. Claiborne: TJ to William C. C. Claiborne, 26 May.
suggested this to mr Briggs: see Isaac Briggs to TJ, 1 Mch. 1803.
current of the Missisipi: see Dunbar to TJ, 28 Jan. 1804, and TJ’s reply on 13 Mch. 1804.
Pierre Louis Georges Du Buat, a French military engineer, published a revised and enlarged edition of his Principes d’hydraulique in 1786. In addition to presenting the work to TJ, the author sent it to George Washington in 1788 ( No. 3743; , 1:34-5, 93-4).
1. Preceding four words interlined.