James Madison Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jarvis, William" AND Period="Jefferson Presidency"
sorted by: relevance
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/02-12-02-0538

To James Madison from William Jarvis, 9 October 1806 (Abstract)

From William Jarvis, 9 October 1806 (Abstract)

§ From William Jams. 9 October 1806, Lisbon. “The foregoing are copies of my two last;1 the latter went by the ship Hare, Captn Stephenson, via New York. I have conversed with several well informed Englishmen, one of which was very intimate with Lord Rosslyn, & every member of his Family, & who has generally freely favoured me with what information he was possessed of, on political subjects; and can learn nothing more than the conjectural observations already given in my several letters relative to the Squadron’s or His Lordship’s coming here; nor not a satisfactory sentence tending to explain the cause of their sudden departure. The only observation they make (for here speculation is silent) is that the British Govmt. is satisfied as it regards this Country or that every thing is well as to Portugal: so that you will perceive all is still mystery relative to this transaction. Thi⟨s⟩ is somewhat singular & it must certainly be set down as an affair deserving the merit of secrecy even if it cannot lay claim to any other Kind of praise. In the dearth of all sort of fact I must beg you will allow me to make one more conjecture. It is confidently said here, I presume on the strength of the English papers, that a new coalition between Russia, Prussia, Sweden, Hesse & probably Saxony is actually formed or on the point of being concluded. If this is the fact will it not reasonably account for the departure of the Lords St. Vincent & Rosslyn; owing to a beleif that the Emperor Napoleon will have so much work on his hands to the Northward that this Country will not immediately occupy his attention. But if a new Coalition is formed why does Lord Lauderdale remain at Paris? for it is certain that none could be formed without Gt. Britain, as British subsidies must be the sinews of Action. To gain time: this does not appear probable for the Vigilance & penetration of Napoleon & Talleyrand are not likely to be so easily deceived. I hope that in all these contests our two Negotiations will be attended with success.

“This will be accompanied by a dup: copy of my letter to Mr de Araujo, relative to the Powder,2 (it is now done)—a copy of a letter to His Excy. relative to Captn Hooper’s touching into Faro with a Cargo of twelve hundred & seventy three quintal⟨s⟩ of Cod-fish & going out again without breaking bulk.3 The excuse he offered was not according to the franquia Law, which is precise that it shall be from distress of some kind or other; but is now so relaxed, that offering as a reason a want of provisions or water or contrary winds, is admitted without any farther examination of any Kind; so that I am in hopes that I shall get the duties remitted on the Cargo. I was charged with it only a few months since.

“I beleive I have omitted hitherto to mention to you that about fifteen or eighteen months ago, another additional duty of four ⅌ Cent was laid on Tonnage on all Vessels indiscriminately: and that at the solicitation of the Tobacco Contract about the same time or a little before, a Contract Visit is allowed to be made on all Foreign Vessels; & for attending as interpreter a Broker receives upon each Vessel 240 rees. By another regulation allowed the Contract, all Vessels coming from France only are obliged to have a contract guard on board, for which the Vessel pays 600 rees ⅌ day. Inclosed are two letters, one from Erving & the other from Mr Simpson.”

Adds in a postscript: “Since writing the foregoing it has been stated to me by the Gentleman whom I mentioned was intimate with the Earl of Rosslyn, but simply offered in the way of opinion, that the fleet &c coming here was owing to a desire intimated to Lord Lauderdale on the part of the French Cabinet, that Gt. Britain would leave this Country to the will of France; which being refused, that it was intimated on the part of that Cabinet that it was impossible for England to protect it, of course it must of necessity fall into the hands of France that this indication of an intention to possess it, was also corroborated by information of some Negotions [sic] to this effect was carrying on between France & Spain and finally it was feared that Mr Jerome Bonaparte’s squadron would come here, which would have effectually have secured this Country both by sea & land; and that the cause of their going away was owing to the positive assurance of the French Govmt. to this, that the Emperor had no hostile intentions against Portugal, of which Lord Lauderdale was then likewise satisfied. This Gentleman had certainly more opportunities of knowing than any person in Lisbon, and I have generally found him pretty candid: after stating which I shall leave Sir to your better judgment to determine what Credit ought to be given to these observations. He was not certain, but beleived the subsidy had ceased, and was of opinion that a very large present had been made in Diamonds to several members of the F: Govmt.4 Discount on paper 18 ⅌ Ct.”

RC, two copies, and enclosure (DNA: RG 59, CD, Lisbon, vol. 3). First RC 9 pp. Second RC 4 pp.; dated 8 Oct. 1806, with a 9 Oct. postscript; marked “(Copy)”; in a clerk’s hand, signed by Jarvis; written above Jarvis to JM, 15 Oct. 1806; docketed by Wagner as received in that dispatch. For surviving enclosure, see n. 3.

1Jarvis to JM, 27 Sept. and 4 Oct. 1806.

2The enclosure has not been found, but see Jarvis to JM, 18 Sept. 1806, n. 2.

3Jarvis’s 30 Sept. 1806 letter to António de Araújo de Azevedo (2 pp.) stated that in December 1801, Asa Hooper of the Hope had put into Faro on his way to Cádiz in order to get information on the state of the markets and the possibility of peace, rather than to unload cargo; that the judge of the Faro customhouse had refused to grant the Hope franquia (an exemption from duties) even though the customhouse judge at Lisbon ordered that it be done; and that Hooper had been forced to sign a bond for the duties pending a decision on the case by the superior court. On 11 Feb. 1806 that tribunal stated its conclusion that franquia should be granted. Jarvis requested that the prince regent confirm the decision and cancel Hooper’s bond, adding that such an outcome would promote foreign trade in Portugal’s ports.

4Second RC omits “F.”

Index Entries