From Alexander Hamilton
Philadelphia Decr 2d 1790.
The day before yesterday I received a letter from Mr Woodbury Langdon declining the appointment offered him. there was a letter with it for you which I immediately forwarded.1 Since that time I have conversed with Mr Langdon I have heared from Mr Gilman;2 the former is warm in his recommendation of Mr Keith Spence; he states that his insolvency was owing to the loss of a valuable ship & Cargo, and was attended with the most honorable circumstances; that an immediate adjustment with the Creditors took place to their entire satisfaction; that the deficiency was only of 1000 pounds, which he considers as remitted; that Mr Spence was in partnership with Mr Sherburne; that they have both been since in good business, and are now more than able to pay whatever they may owe; that the failure happened some years ago; that Mr Spence tho’ a native of Scotland, came early to this Country; is a man of Education; and abilities, well Known & respected, a firm friend to the revolution & to the National Government; married to a Lady of New Hampshire with whom he has several children: he shewed me a letter from Mr Spence, which gives a favorable impression of his modesty & capacity.3
Mr Gilman talks of Mr Spence as a man not generally known, & who being by birth a foreigner, is not as acceptable as a native to the people of that Country, that his attachment to the American cause was rather ambiguous; that he married the daughter of a person who is now in Office in the Island of Bermuda and lately made a visit there; that his insolvency would throw a shade on his appointment in the Public opinion. He on the other hand warmly recommends a Mr William Gardiner the present Treasurer of New Hampshire; speaks decidedly of his good character & abilities as a man of business, and of his general good standing in the State.
Mr Langdon admits Mr Gardiner to be a good and a qualified man—says he was formerly his first clerk, but affirms that Mr Spence has greatly the superiority in point of qualification—hints at an arrangement between Mr Gardiner & Mr Gilman the late Loan Officer, by which Mr Gilman expects to succeed to the Office of Treasurer, if the other obtains that of Commissioner of Loans.
Thus stands my information as far as it goes; I conjecture on the whole that Mr Spence is an unexceptionable man in every respect but that of his late insolvency & that he is probably better qualified than Mr Gardiner, or in other words a man of more ability.
That nevertheless Mr Gardiner is qualified for the office & in other respects an eligible person. Perhaps the appointment of him will be upon the whole a safer one; freer from hazard of imputation of any kind.4
You are I presume not unapprised of a Langdon & Gilman party in New Hampshire.5 Tho’ it is desireable this business should be finished; yet if it be supposed likely that the arrival of the Eastern members will afford any new light, a few days delay cannot be very important. I have the honor to remain Sir Yr Affectionate and Obedte Servant
1. Woodbury Langdon’s letter to Hamilton has not been found, but the enclosure was apparently Langdon’s letter to GW of 9 Nov. 1790 declining appointment as commissioner of loans for New Hampshire.
2. Probably Sen. John Langdon of New Hampshire, Woodbury Langdon’s brother, and Nicholas Gilman, a representative from New Hampshire.
3. John Langdon apparently had predicted his brother’s refusal to serve as commissioner of loans and recommended Keith Spence for the post in a letter to Hamilton in October (not found), which Hamilton forwarded to GW about 20 Oct., shortly before leaving New York for Philadelphia. By 26 Oct. Hamilton had withdrawn his support for Spence in the event of Langdon’s refusal, having learned from Tobias Lear of Spence’s “recent insolvency” (see Hamilton to GW, 26 Oct. 1790). On 8 Nov. GW wrote to Hamilton that in the event of Langdon’s refusal, he would be willing to appoint Nathaniel Rogers to the post (see GW to Hamilton, 8 Nov. 1790, n.2). Hamilton’s subsequent conversation with John Langdon described here apparently changed his mind.
4. GW ultimately nominated William Gardner for the post of commissioner of loans for New Hampshire (see GW to the U.S. Senate, 23 Dec. 1790). The appointment was confirmed the next day. Gardner served until he was dismissed in June 1798.
5. Politics in New Hampshire at this date remained factional, with important divisions over state fiscal policy and judicial reform. The Langdons and the Gilmans were principal leaders in the Exeter Junto, a group that also included John Samuel Sherburne, James Sheafe, and John Pierce. The Exeter Junto supported the establishment of the first state bank in New Hampshire, a public-private institution similar to the Bank of the United States, and opposed legislative interference with the judiciary, an issue brought to the fore by efforts of western members of the legislature to impeach and remove Woodbury Langdon as associate justice of the state superior court. The members of the Exeter Junto were nominally Federalist in national politics but did not consistently support administration measures in Congress. John Langdon was the most important member of the group at the national level; he supported assumption, the establishment of the Bank of the United States, and the bill to increase the standing army to 6,000 men in 1792, but he later became a prominent Republican. Nicholas Gilman opposed assumption in the House of Representatives and also later joined the Republicans (Turner, The Ninth State, description begins Lynn Warren Turner. The Ninth State: New Hampshire’s Formative Years. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1983. description ends 112–25).