From Thomas Jefferson
Paris May 25. 1788.
The inclosed letter for mr. Jay being of a private nature, I have thought it better to put it under your cover lest it might be opened by some of his clerks in the case of his absence. But I inclose a press copy of it for yourself, as you will perceive the subject of it referred to you as well as to him.1 I ask your aid in it so far as you think right, and to have done what you think right. If you will now be so good as to cast your eye over the copy inclosed, what follows the present sentence will be some details, supplementory to that only, necessary for your information, but not proper for me to state to mr. Jay.
Mr. Jay. Tho appointed a minister resident at the court of Madrid he never was received in that character. He was continually passing from Paris to Madrid and Madrid to Paris so that he had no occasion to establish a houshold at either. Accordingly he staid principally in furnished lodgings. Of all our ministers he had the least occasion for an outfit, and I suppose spent almost nothing on that article. He was of a disposition too to restrain himself within any limits of expence whatever, and it suited his recluse turn.2 Should he judge of what others should do, by what he did, it would be an improper criterion. He was in Europe as a voyageur only, and it was while the salary was 500 guineas more than at present.
J. Adams. He came over when, instead of outfit & salary, all expences were paid. Of rigorous honesty, and careless of appearances he lived for a considerable time as an œconomical private individual. After he was fixed at The Hague and the salary at a sum certain, he continued his œconomical stile till out of the difference between his expences & his salary, he could purchase furniture for his house. This was the easier as the salary was at 2500 guineas then. He was obliged too to be passing between Paris and The Hague so as to avoid any regular current of ex-pence. When he established himself, his pecuniary affairs were under the direction of Mrs. Adams one of the most estimable characters on earth, and the most attentive & honourable œconomists. Neither had a wish to lay up a copper, but both wished to make both ends meet. I suspect however, from an expression dropped in conversation, that they were not able to do this, and that a deficit in their accounts appeared in their winding up. If this conjecture be true, it is a proof that the salary, so far from admitting savings, is inequal to a very plain stile of life, for such was theirs. I presume Congress will be asked to allow it, and it is evident to me, from what I saw while in London that it ought to be done, as they did not expend a shilling which should have been avoided. Would it be more eligible to set the example of making good a deficit, or to give him an Outfit, which will cover it? The impossibility of living on the sum allowed, reputably, was the true cause of his insisting on his recall.
Doctr. Franklin. He came over while all expences were paid. He rented a house with standing furniture, such as tables, chairs, presses &ca and bought all other necessaries. The latter were charged in his account, the former was included in the article of houserent and paid during the whole time of his stay here; and as the established rate of hire for furniture is from 30. to 40. per cent. per annum, the standing furniture must have been paid for three times over during the 8. years he staid here. His salary too was 2500 guineas. When Congress reduced it to less than 2000. he refused to accede to it, asked his recall, and insisted that whenever they chose to alter the conditions on which he came out, if he did not approve of it, they ought to replace him in America on the old conditions. He lived plain, but as decently as his salary would allow. He saved nothing, but avoided debt. He knew he could not do this on the reduced salary & therefore asked his recall with decision.
To him I succeeded. He had established a certain stile of living. The same was expected from me and there were 500 guineas a year less to do it on. It has been aimed at however as far as was practicable. This rendered it constantly necessary to step neither to the right nor to the left to incur any expence which could possibly be avoided & it called for an almost womanly attention to the details of the houshold, equally perplexing, disgusting, & inconsistent with business. You will be sensible that in this situation no savings could be made for reimbursing the half year’s salary ordered to be advanced under the former commission & more than as much again which was unavoidably so applied, without order, for the purchase of the Outfit. The reason of the thing, the usage of all nations, the usage of our own by paying all expences of preceding ministers, which gave them the outfit as far as their circumstances appeared to them to render it necessary, have made me take for granted all along that it would not be refused to me; nor should I have mentioned it now but that the administration is passing into other hands, and more complicated forms. It would be disagreeable to me to be presented to them in the first instance as a suitor. Men come into business at first with visionary principles. It is practice alone which can correct & conform them to the actual current of affairs. In the mean time those to whom their errors were first applied have been their victims. The government may take up the project of appointing foreign ministers without outfits and they may ruin two or three individuals before they find that that article is just as indispensable as the salary. They must then fall into the current of general usage, which has become general only because experience has established it’s necessity.
Upon the whole, be so good as to reflect on it, and to do, not what your friendship to me, but your opinion of what is right will dictate.3 Accept, in all cases, assurances of the sincere esteem & respect with which I am Dear Sir Your friend & servant
RC and enclosure (DLC); FC (DLC: Jefferson Papers). RC docketed by JM, “Recd. Aug. 1. 88.” Italicized words are those encoded by Jefferson using the code he sent JM on 11 May 1785. RC decoded interlinearly by JM.
1. Jefferson to Jay, 15 May 1788 (Boyd, Papers of Jefferson description begins Julian P. Boyd et al., eds., The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (19 vols. to date; Princeton, 1950—). description ends , XIII, 161–64). Jefferson’s letter concerned his unsettled account with Congress for the time that he had been a minister in Europe. In particular, he wanted Jay’s and JM’s advice on the manner in which to obtain reimbursement for the expense of his “Outfit,” i.e., his clothes, carriage and horses, and household furniture. Fearing that his claim might be disallowed “by passing it over,” Jefferson wished the present Congress to act on the matter rather than referring it to the new government. “Not knowing the circumstances under which Congress may exist and act at the moment you shall receive this, I am unable to judge what should be done on this subject.… Give me leave then to ask your consultation with Mr. Madison on this subject, and to assure you that whatever you are so good as to do herein will be perfectly approved and considered as a great obligation.”
2. Jefferson here deleted “which is to avoid society” in the RC, but not in the FC.
3. Jefferson’s claim for the expenses of his outfit, amounting to one year’s salary, remained unsettled during the remainder of the Confederation period. Not until 1792 was his account as minister to France, which included this charge for his outfit, approved by Congress (Malone, Jefferson and the Rights of Man, pp. 204–5).