From William Bradford
Philada. October 17th 1774.
My silence has been long & perhaps you will tell me unkind; but I plead your release from strict pu[n]ctuality in bar to any reproofs of that sort: And do not think that I plead this because I [have] no better plea: but because It would take up more time than I can spare to tell you all the causes of my silence: yet they may be comprehended in two word[s] Sickness & Business.1 But tho they prevented me from writing to you they could not prevent me thinking frequently and tenderly on You; for beleive me, whether sick or well, busy or at liesure, I am most sincerely yours.
The Congress have sate much longer than was expected & have not yet adjourned, but it is expected they will do so in a few days. Their proceedings are a profound secret & the doors open to no one; so that were you here as you wish[ed] your curiosity would be but poorly gratified in that respect; yet there is so great a concourse of gentlemen from all parts of the Continent that you would have an opportunity of forming some very valuable & agreeable connections & amply recompensing yourself for your disappointment with regard to the hearing the debates of Congress. Philadelphia has become another Cairo; with this difference that the one is a city swarming with Merchants the other with politicians & Statesmen. The Congress sits in the Carpenter’s Hall in one room of which the City Library is kept & of which the Librarian tells me the Gentlemen make great & constant use.2 By which we may conjecture that their measures will be wisely plan’d since they debate on them like philosophers; for by what I was told Vattel, Barlemaqui Locke & Montesquie[u] seem to be the standar[d]s to which they refer either when settling the rights of the Colonies or when a dispute arises on the Justice or propriety of a measure.3 Whether these dispute[s] shall be published at large; or the resolves with the reasons of them; or only the resolves by themselves I cannot pretend to say: Be that as it will, when they are published you shall have them by the earliest opportunity.4 A Gentleman of my acquaintances goes next week to Fredericksburg & I will send you by him some of the political phamphlets with which our city is filled; but which you may not have seen. I have been able to read but few of them & that with no great attention: I believe however some of them are worthy your perusal. I send you, now, a poem on divine revelation which Mr. Breckenridge spoke at Commencement & has published.5 He desired me to do so & requested you to recommend it to your friends if you think it has any merit in order to assist the sale that the printer may not be a loser by him. I am afraid he has published it at an improper time; the political storm is too high for the soft still voice of the muse to be list[e]ned to; & indeed this does not seem the proper time for poetry unless it be such as Tyrtaeus wrote.6 I am glad however that our friend seems determined that these blossoms of Genius shall not “waste their sweetness in the desert air.”7 It will encour[a]ge him to make still greater attempts & tutor him to heights he would once have trembled at. If I may be allowed to judge he appears to have rather a strong and masculine Genius than a just & delicate taste: Imagination is his province. The consequence of this will be that his writings tho’ enriched with many original beauties will be obscured with Faults which even a moderate Genius would have avoided. Perhaps the pun on the word Tartarean in this poem will justify the latter part of this remark.8 But where is the man that ever bestrode pegasus and did not sometimes get a fall.
I went yesterday to hear our classmate McCorkle predicate: & I assure you his sermon was very orthodox: The point he chiefly Laboured to prove was “that the Laws of God were superior in wisdom to the Laws of men”; & I think his arguments on this part were in a gr[e]at measure unanswerable; the rest had a great deal of chronology but very little instruction in it. However he is better than many that I have heard.9 Duffield & Lewis Wilson are chosen tutors at College: I am somewhat surprised at the Latter’s accepting so troublesom[e] & so ungrateful a task.10
How came you to direct my letter to Mr Ervin & his to me when you wrote last: you must have been as absent as the Menalcas of Bruyere.11 ’Tis the first time I have been honoured with the title of “reverend.” Should you & I ever write treason you must be more careful to whom you direct what you write. I hope you are so of your billet-doux.
There is no news at present: when the Congress breaks up you shall hear from me again.
I am &c
W Bradford jun
P S. If you have any friends in Baltimore to whom I could direct the Pamphlets etc.[?] I wish to send you, I could oblige you often in that way.12
1. In a letter of 24 September 1774 to William Linn, Bradford wrote: “I have been sick … very sick: I was within an ace of supping with my progenitors” (Historical Society of Pennsylvania).
2. Francis Daymon was the librarian of the Library Company of Philadelphia. The availability of its books was one reason why the delegates to the First Continental Congress, in spite of the objections of Joseph Galloway and a few others, selected Carpenter’s Hall as a meeting place (Journals of the Continental Congress, I, 27; Edmund Cody Burnett, The Continental Congress [New York, 1941], pp. 33–34; Austin K. Gray, Benjamin Franklin’s Library: A Short Account of the Library Company of Philadelphia, 1731–1931 [New York, 1936], pp. 27–28).
3. Although the delegates may have frequently consulted the works on political philosophy and international law of John Locke, Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu, Jean Jacques Burlamaqui, and Emeric de Vattel, they merely quoted Montesquieu and Cesare B. Beccaria in their series of “Addresses”; and Beccaria only in the one entitled, “To the Inhabitants of the Province of Quebec” (Journals of the Continental Congress, I, 106). General Charles Lee, who was not a member of the Congress, apparently had a large share in drafting this address (John Richard Alden, General Charles Lee: Traitor or Patriot? [Baton Rouge, 1951], p. 60).
4. Bradford was in an advantageous position to know what went on behind the closed doors of the First Continental Congress. His father, William, and his older brother, Thomas, besides publishing The Pennsylvania Journal; and the Weekly Advertiser, were the official printers of the Congress. Following its adjournment on 26 October, the Bradfords at their “London Coffee House” address brought out the first edition of the Journal of the Proceedings of the Congress held at Philadelphia, September 5, 1774.
5. [Hugh Henry Brackenridge], A Poem on Divine Revelation; Being an Exercise Delivered at the Public Commencement at Nassau-Hall, September 24, 1774 … (Philadelphia: Printed and Sold by R. Aitken, Bookseller, opposite the London-Coffee-House, Front Street, 1774).
6. An elegiac poet of about 650 b.c., whose poetry praised the laws, patriotism, and heroism of his fellow Spartans during the second Messenian War.
7. From line 56 of Thomas Gray’s Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard. Bradford’s “their” should be “its,” and his “in” should be “on,” to conform with the original.
8. The reference is to the lines:
…Night on the east comes down
With gloom Tartarean, and in part it rose
From Tartary beneath the dusky pole.
Bradford’s strictures upon the quality of the poem appear to have been shared by other critics during his own and later generations. Brackenridge used the same heroic style of verse in his poems on the Battle of Bunker Hill and on the death of Montgomery at Quebec, but most of his later literary output was satirical (Brackenridge, Poem on Divine Revelation, p. 13; Claude M. Newlin, Hugh Henry Brackenridge, pp. 30–33).
9. In a letter on [1?] November to William Linn, Bradford commented further: “… for three sundays past have been entertained with hearing [Samuel] McCorkle, [Oliver] Rees, and [Israel] Evans …: I have a great inclination to laugh at the first; but you would chide me if I did” (Historical Society of Pennsylvania).
10. John Duffield, a Pennsylvanian, delivered the Latin oration at the College of New Jersey Commencement in 1773, and served as tutor for two years. He was a surgeon in the 3d Continental Artillery in 1782–1783 (F. B. Heitman, Historical Register of Officers of the Continental Army, p. 160). Bradford’s surprise because Lewis Feuilleteau Wilson (1753–1803), College of New Jersey, ’73, accepted a humble tutorship may have reflected the fact that he was a wealthy West Indies planter’s son and had received his early education in England. Undecided between a career as a physician or as a Presbyterian minister, he became the former in 1775 and practiced medicine successfully for eleven years. From 1793 until his death, he was a pastor at Concord, N.C. (New Jersey Archives description begins William A. Whitehead et al., eds., Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey (1st ser., 42 vols.; Newark, Trenton, Paterson, 1880–1949). description ends , 1st ser., XXIX, 52–57; John Maclean, History of the College of New Jersey, I, 365; Sprague, Annals description begins William B. Sprague, Annals of the American Pulpit (9 vols.; New York, 1857–69). description ends , III, 570–75).
11. See JM to Bradford, 23 August 1774, n. 5. For the absent-minded and blundering “Menalcas,” see Jean de La Bruyère’s essay “Of Man” in The Works of Monsieur De La Bruyère (2 vols.; London, 1713), II, 211–18.
12. Bradford used shorthand symbols for the italicized words.