To Benjamin Rush
Monticello Sep. 23. 1800.
I have to acknolege the reciept of your favor of Aug. 22. and to congratulate you on the healthiness of your city. still Baltimore, Norfolk & Providence admonish us that we are not clear of our new scourge.1 when great evils happen, I am in the habit of looking out for what good may arise from them as2 consolations to us: and Providence has in fact so established the order of things as that most evils are the means of producing some good. the yellow fever will discourage the growth of great cities in our nation; & I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health and the liberties of man. true, they nourish some of the elegant arts; but the useful ones can thrive elsewhere, and less perfection in the others with more health virtue & freedom would be my choice.—I agree with you entirely in condemning the mania of giving names to objects of any kind after persons still living. death alone can seal the title of any man to this honour by putting it out of his power to forfeit it. there is one3 other mode of rewarding merit which I have often thought might be introduced so as to gratify the living by praising the dead. in giving for instance a commission of chief justice to Bushrod Washington it should be in consideration of his integrity and science in the laws, and of the services rendered to our country by his illustrious relation &c. a commission to a descendant of Dr. Franklin, besides being in consideration of the proper qualifications of the person, should add that of the great services rendered by his illustrious ancestor B.F. by the advancement of science, & by inventions useful to man, &c. I am not sure that we ought to change all our names imposed during the regal government. sometimes indeed they were given through adulation, but often also as the reward of the merit of the times, sometimes for services rendered the colony. perhaps too a name when given should be deemed a sacred property.
I promised you a letter on Christianity, which I have not forgotten. on the contrary it is because I have reflected on it, that I find much more time necessary for it than I can at present dispose of. I have a view of the subject which ought to displease neither the rational Christian or Deist; & would reconcile many to a character they have too hastily rejected. I do not know however4 that it would reconcile the genus irritabile vatum, who are all in arms against me. their hostility is on too interesting ground to be softened. the delusions into which the XYZ plot shewed it possible to push the people, the successful experiment made under the prevalence of that delusion, on the clause of the constitution which while it secured the freedom of the press, covered also the freedom of religion, had given to the clergy a very favorite hope of obtaining5 an establishment of a particular form of Christianity thro’ the US. and as every sect believes it’s own form the true one, every one perhaps6 hoped for it’s7 own: but especially the Episcopalians & Congregationalists. the returning good sense of our country threatens abortion to their hopes, & they believe that any position of power confided to me will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. and they believe truly.8 for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. but this is all they have to fear from me: & enough too in their opinion; & this is the cause of their printing lying pamphlets against me, forging conversations for me with Mazzei, Bishop Madison9 &c which are absolute falshoods without a circumstance of truth to rest on; falshoods too of which I acquit Mazzei & Bishop Madison for they are men of truth.—but enough of this. it is more than I have before committed to paper on the subject of all the lies which have been preached or printed against me.—I have not seen the work of Sonnoni which you mention. but I have seen another work on Africa, Parke’s, which I fear will throw cold water on the hopes of the friends of freedom. you will have seen10 an account of an attempt at insurrection in this state. I am looking with anxiety to see what will be it’s effect on our state. we are truly to be pitied.—I fear we have little chance to see you at the Federal city or in Virginia, & as little at Philadelphia. it would be a great treat to recieve you here. but nothing but sickness could affect that: so I do not wish it.11 for I wish you health & happiness, and think of you with affection. Adieu.
RC (DLC: Benjamin Rush Papers); addressed: “Doctr. Benjamin Rush Philadelphia”; franked; endorsed by Rush. PrC (DLC); faint, with portions overwritten by TJ in ink, presumably, because of variations from RC described in notes 7, 8, and 10 below, sometime after he had forgotten some wording of the letter. In TJR description begins Thomas Jefferson Randolph, ed., Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, from the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Charlottesville, 1829, 4 vols. description ends , 3:440–2; HAW description begins Henry A. Washington, ed., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, New York, 1853–54, 9 vols. description ends , 4:335–7; L & B description begins Andrew A. Lipscomb and Albert E. Bergh, eds., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Washington, D.C., 1903–04, 20 vols. description ends , 10:173–6; Ford, description begins Paul Leicester Ford, ed., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Letterpress Edition, New York, 1892–99, 10 vols. description ends 7:458–61; and versions derived from them, transcription follows the emended PrC with variations from RC; also printed in EG description begins Dickinson W. Adams and Ruth W. Lester, eds., Jefferson’s Extracts from the Gospels, Princeton, 1983, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Second Series description ends , 319–21, where PrC was misnamed a Dft.
Oliver Ellsworth was still Chief Justice, although in France on 16 Oct. he penned a letter of resignation, citing poor health. Adams received that document on 15 Dec. (DHSC description begins Maeva Marcus and others, eds., The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States 1789–1800, New York, 1985–2007, 8 vols. description ends , 1:123; TJ to James Madison, 19 Dec. 1800).
Horace’s remark on the “irritable tribe of poets (or prophets),” genus irritabile vatum, is from the second book of his Epistulae, letter 2, line 102.
Lying pamphlets: according to the Serious Considerations pamphlet attributed to William Linn, Philip Mazzei had related an anecdote to clergyman John Blair Smith of Virginia, who had since died, in which Mazzei and TJ passed a dilapidated church and Mazzei expressed surprise that the local people would let the building fall into disrepair: “‘It is good enough,’ rejoined Mr. Jefferson, ‘for him that was born in a manger!!’” (Serious Considerations on the Election of a President [Trenton, N.J., 1800], 13–14).
Work on Africa: Mungo Park, Travels in the Interior Districts of Africa: Performed under the Direction and Patronage of the African Association, in the Years 1795, 1796, and 1797, first published in London in 1799 and in American editions the next year. TJ’s attention may have been drawn to the work by an anticipatory comment in William Short’s letter of 27 Feb. 1798.
1. Preceding three words interlined in place of “it.”
2. Preceding two words interlined in place of “[when a],” and TJ first wrote the word that follows as “consolation.”
3. TJ here canceled “kind.”
4. Word inserted in margin.
5. Word written over a partial erasure, “[establish].”
6. Word interlined.
7. Word illegible in PrC, overwritten by TJ as “his.”
8. Word illegible in PrC, overwritten by TJ as “rightly.”
9. TJ first wrote “conversations with Mazzei & Bishop Madison” before altering the phrase to read as above.
10. Preceding two words illegible in PrC, overwritten by TJ as “hear <of>.”
11. Word and period interlined in place of a colon.