From James Madison
Philada. May 13. 1783
Marbois lately took occasion in our family to complain of ungenerous proceedings of the British against individuals as well as against their enemies at large and finally signified that he was no stranger to the letter transmited to Congress which he roundly avered to be spurious. His information came from Boston where the incident is said to be no secret, but whether [it] be the echo of letters from Philada. or has transpired from the correspondence of Mr. Adams to his private friends is uncertain. This conversation passed during my absence in New Jersey, but was related to me by Mr. Carrol.
A project for a treaty of commerce with Britain has been reported by Secretary foreign affairs and is now in the hands of a committee. The objects most at heart are first a direct trade between this country and the West Indies. Second a right of carrying between the later and other parts of the British empire. Thirdly the right of carrying from West Indies to all other parts of the world. As the price of these advantages it is proposed that we shall ad[mit] British subjects to equal privileges with our own citizens. As to the 1st object it may be observed that the bill lately brought in British parliament renders it probable that it may be obtained without such a cession. As to the second that it concerns eastern states cheifly and as to the third that it concerns them alone. Whilst the privilege to be ceded will cheifly if not alone affect the southern states. The interest of these seems to require that they should retain at least the faculty of giving any encouragement to their own merchants ships or mariners which may be necessary to prevent relapse under scotch monopoly or to acquire a maritime importance. The Eastern states need no such precaution.1
Genl. Washington and Genl. Carlton have had an interview on the subject of arrangements for executing the provisional Treaty. It was interrupted by the sudden indisposition of the latter. In the conversation which took place he professed intentions of evacuating New York and all the posts in the U.S. held by British Garrisons as soon as possible, but did not authorize any determinate or speedy expectations. He confessed that a number of Negroes had gone off with the Refugees since the arrival of the Treaty, and undertook to justify the permission by a palpable and scandalous misconstruction of the Treaty, and by the necessity of adhering to the proclamations under the faith of which the Negroes had eloped into their service. He said that if the Treaty should be otherwise explained, compensation would be made to the owners and to make this the more easy, a register had been and would be kept of all Negroes leaving N.Y. before the surrender of it by the British Garrison. This information has been referred by Congress to a Committee. But the progress already made in the discharge of the prisoners, the only convenient pledge by which fair dealing on the other side could be enforced, makes it probable that no remedy will be applied to the evil.
I have sent Mr. Randolph a pamphlet comprehending all the papers which are to be laid before the States relative to the National debt &c., and have desired him to let you have the reading it. The fewness of the copies made it impossible for me to get one for each of you.
I am Dr Sir your sincere friend
J. Madison Jr.
RC (DLC: Madison Papers); addressed to TJ (without place) and franked by Madison; endorsed by Madison after its return to him; partly in cipher.
The letter transmitted to congress was doubtless that from Adams referred to in Madison’s letter to TJ of 6 May 1783. The committee to whom the project of a treaty of commerce was referred reported on 19 June (see JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford and others, eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789, Washington, D.C., 1904–37, 34 vols. description ends , xxiv, 404–405). Washington’s interview with Sir Guy Carleton took place on 6 May 1783. A clerk’s copy of an “Extract from the Substance of the Conference between General Washington and Sir Guy Carleton at an Interview at Orange Town 6th May 1783,” together with a press copy made from it, is in DLC: TJ Papers, 9: 1470–2, 1473–8. There are also in DLC: TJ Papers clerk’s copies of the following pertaining to this same general subject: (1) a report in the hand of William Stephen Smith concerning protests made to Carleton against the removal of slaves from New York City, undated; (2) Carleton and Robert Digby to Washington, 19 Mch. 1783; (3) Carleton to Livingston, 26 Mch. 1783; (4) Digby to Livingston, 27 Mch. 1783; (4) Carleton to Washington, 6 Apr. 1783; (5) Carleton to Livingston, 14 Apr. 1783; (5) an extract from Carleton’s general orders of 15 Apr. 1783 giving force to the 7th Article of the preliminary treaty which included a clause forbidding the carrying away of slaves. The pamphlet that Madison sent to Randolph was Address and Recommendations to The States, by The United States in Congress assembled. Philadelphia, 1783 (see JCC description begins Worthington C. Ford and others, eds., Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789, Washington, D.C., 1904–37, 34 vols. description ends , xxv, 986). Joseph Jones later reported to Madison that “many [members of the Assembly] now say the reading the pamphlet of Congress determined them against the measure, and Randolph, writing “with a despondency,” said that “by some unaccountable revolution the zealous patrons have cooled” and gave, later, the information that General Washington’s circular letter on the 5 per cent impost may have been a contributing factor: “The murmur is free and general against what is called the unsollicited intrusion of his advice” (Randolph to Madison, 14, 28 June; Jones to Madison, 14 June 1783, Madison Papers, DLC).
1. Except for the italicized words and parts of words, this and the preceding paragraph were written in code and were decoded by TJ on a separate sheet preserved with RC, on which Madison wrote: “Decypher of May 13. 1783.” Code No. 3 was employed and TJ’s decoding has been verified by the editors.