Albermarle Old Court House 28 May 1781
I have the honor to inclose to your Excellency a representation to the House of Delegates of the State of the Virginia Line.
As this is a matter which requires the consideration of that House I beg your Excellency to lay this representation before them as early as possible. with the highest respect I have the honor to be Your Excellencys Most Obed Sevt.
Representation of the State of the Virginia Line
[28 May 1781]
Major General Baron Steuben thinks it his duty to lay before the honorable house of Delegates the present situation of the Virginia Line.
At the General’s arrival in this State in November last, the line consisted of about 1400 men, chiefly drafts for 18 months raised the preceeding summer. Of these, 500 were [sent] to the southward under Col. Buford, but were so naked as to be unfit for service; the remaining 900 were at Chesterfield destitute as well of arms as cloaths. With great difficulty 800 of these by the unexpected arrival of some cloathing from Philadelphia were at length equipped and sent in two detachments to General Greene, and joined him before the action at Guilford; since which time he has received no reinforcement of regular troops from Virginia. By the last arrangements of Congress, 8 regiments of infantry 2 of cavalry and one of artillery are required as the quota from this state, amounting in the whole to 5898 effective men exclusive of officers, staff &c. By the act of assembly passed in the fall session, the legislature determined that 3,000 men should be raised which were to be embodied in the month of February last. This law, however has not been enforced: the invasion of the state and a variety of unfortunate circumstances have so far defeated the execution of it, that in very many counties there has been no draft at all, and the whole number of recruits which has yet arrived does not exceed 450 men, and should the enemy continue in the state during the campaign, that number will probably be all that will be collected.1
After the action of Guilford the Virginia infantry then
|with the army from extraordinary desertions did not exceed||700|
|Col. Washington’s Cavalry consisted of about||120|
|Amounting in the whole to no more than||9542|
The opposition made to the law in some counties, the entire neglect of it in others, and an unhappy disposition to evade the fair execution of it in all afford a very melancholy prospect: A prospect the more truly distressing, when it is remembered that the Virginia quota alone, would of itself be far more than sufficient not only to exterminate the whole force of the enemy from this state, but to endanger all the conquests they have made to the southward. The recital of the distresses which will follow from a perseverance in these measures is too painful to be attempted. Certain it is, however, that unless some mode is adopted to punish desertion and enforce the execution of the laws, unless some check is devised to prevent the shameful evasions and impositions, which to the disgrace of individuals are too successfully attempted, this country will sink under the power of her enemies, or be dependent for support solely upon foreign assistance.4
The equipment of the cavalry is of the highest moment. Three hundred horses are wanting to complete them, but the sum limitted by a law of the state being no more than £5000, is utterly inadequate, nor can one horse fit for service be procured at that price. Without the interposition of the legislature, the cavalry cannot be mounted; and in the present situation of affairs, without a formidable cavalry there can be but little security for anything below the mountains.5
FC (NHi); endorsed: “Copy to Govr Jefferson with a memorial to house of delegates 28 May 1781.” Of the enclosure there are two drafts in NHi: (1) A draft in the hand of William North, which was perhaps the first to be composed and represented Steuben’s initial views; and (2) a draft entirely in the hand of William Davies, which was obviously made subsequent to that in North’s hand and was a revision of it, containing one or two slight omissions and some additions as indicated below. The revision by Davies is the text followed above. Under date of 23 May there are in NHi copies of letters from Steuben to Washington and to the Board of War containing a summary account of his effort to raise troops in Virginia for Greene’s army, in which some of the phraseology of Davies’ version of the memorial is used, indicating that both texts of that document were composed at least five days before Steuben transmitted the final version to TJ. The revision by Davies bears at its head the following dateline: “Albemarle O C House 28 May 1781,” but this is not in Davies’ hand and was obviously added at the time and place from which Steuben dispatched the covering letter to TJ.
TJ submitted Steuben’s letter and the memorial in his letter to the speaker on 31 May (JHD description begins Journal of the House of Delegates of the Commonwealth of Virginia (cited by session and date of publication) description ends , May 1781, 1828 edn., p. 7). Steuben was somewhat franker in his comment to Greene about the state of the Virginia line: “The Desertion that prevails among the Recruits is astonishing, and equals that of the Virginia troops with you. … You mention the great want of Officers to the Virginia troops with you. Inclosed you have a list of those who have returned from your Army on various pretences; and when once they get in this state it is impossible to assemble them again. In a word, my dear General, I despair of ever seeing a Virga Line exist. Everything seems to oppose it. … The few recruits we have are formed into a Regt under Colo Gaskins. About 150 are armed. I shall order them in a couple of days to the forks of James River where, at the same time that they in some measure satisfy the people of the state by protecting their magazines which are all collected there, they may be disciplining and equipping the men” (Steuben to Greene, 14 May 1781, NHi).
1. The draft in North’s hand differs somewhat from this sentence, though the substance is the same.
2. The draft in North’s hand adds the number of “440” recruits (450 in present text) and the words “which makes the whole Virga. Line 1394 Men.”
3. This sentence is not in the draft in North’s hand.
4. This entire paragraph is lacking in the draft in North’s hand.
5. The corresponding sentence in the draft in North’s hand merely reads: “The Service of the Cavalry is so Essential to the Operations of the Army as to make this an Object of the most important consideration.”