To Robert Charles4
Draft: American Philosophical Society
Feb. 1. 1757.
I receiv’d your several Favours of August 14. Sept. 18 Sept. 22. and Oct. 16.5 By this Ship you will receive a Box containing sundry Copies of our last Years Votes,6 to which are added as you advised, the Accounts of the Expenditure of the £55,000 and the subsequent £30000 also the Papers relating to the Employing foreign Officers.7 There is also in the Box an authenticated Copy of our late Bill for granting £100,000 to the King’s Use, and of the Vote appointing yourself and Mr. Patridge Agents, under the great Seal, with all the late Messages, &c.8 You will see in the Votes a Copy of the Proprietary Instructions in which a Money Bill is made for us by the Proprietary, sitting in his Closet at 1000 Leagues Distance.9 The Governor laid before us an Estimate of the necessary Expence for defending this Province one Year, amounting to £125,000. We knew our Inability to bear the raising so great a Sum in so short a time; We deducted the least necessary Articles and reduc’d it to £100,000 which we granted, and sent up the Bill. Not that we thought this Province capable of Paying such a Tax yearly or anything like near it; but believing it necessary to exert ourselves at this Time in an extraordinary Manner to save the Country from total Ruin by the Enemy. The Governor, (to use his own polite Word) REJECTS1 it. Your English Kings I think are complaisant enough in such Cases to say, They will advise upon it. We have no Remedy here, but must obey the Instruction, by which we are so confin’d as to the Time of Raising, the Property to be tax’d, the Valuation of that Property and the Sum per Pound to be Tax’d on the Valuation that tis demonstrably impossible by such a Law to raise one Quarter of the Money absolutely necessary to defend us. So ¾ths of our Troops must be disbanded and the Country exposed to the Mercy of our Enemies; rather than the least tittle of a Proprietary Instruction should be deviated from!2 I forbear to enlarge because the House have unanimously desired your Friend Mr. Norris and my self to go home immediately to assist their Agents in getting these Matters settled.3 He has not yet determined, but if he goes, you will by him be fully informed of every thing, and my going will not in my Opinion be necessary: If he declines it, I may possibly soon have the Pleasure of seeing you.4 I am, with great Respect, Sir, Your most obedient humble Servant
4. On Robert Charles, Assembly agent in England, see above, VI, 230 n.
6. See above, p. 114 n.
7. Not identified, but see above, VI, 401–2, on the officers of the Royal American Regiment.
8. See above, pp. 106–7, for the passage of this bill and the Assembly’s Remonstrance against Denny’s refusal of it. At the Assembly’s request, on January 28 Denny had ordered the great seal affixed to a copy of the rejected bill returned to the House. Votes, 1756–57, p. 75. The appointment of Charles and Partridge as agents “for the Year ensuing” was voted Oct. 18, 1756. Ibid., p. 6. The “late Messages” were probably the long ones on quartering printed in Pa. Gaz., Dec. 23, 1756 (see above, pp. 38–49), and perhaps ms copies of the Remonstrance and recent messages on the £100,000 supply bill.
9. See above, VI, 515–31.
1. Denny had used this offensive word in his second return of the supply bill, after receiving the Remonstrance of January 26. Votes, 1756–57, p. 75.
2. The same day BF wrote this letter (probably later in the day), the Assembly resolved “That a new Bill be brought in for granting to His Majesty the Sum of One Hundred Thousand Pounds for the Defence of this Province and the Trade thereof, to be raised by a Tax on all Estates, real and personal, and Taxables, within this Province (the Estates of the Honourable the Proprietaries only excepted) in the Manner prescribed by the Act now in Force for granting Sixty Thousand Pounds to the King’s Use”; thus conceding the major point of exempting the Proprietor’s estates from taxation. Votes, 1756–57, p. 77. Richard Peters took a jaundiced view of the concession, however: “The House is preparing a Bill on the Foot of your Instructions with a view to shew their Insufficiency and Mischevious Consequences.” To Thomas Penn, Jan. 31, 1757; Peters Letterbook, Hist. Soc. Pa. See below, pp. 121–32, 145–52, for further arguments over the supply bill.
3. See above, pp. 109–11.
4. At this point in the draft BF first wrote and then struck out: “It is long since I have been favour’d with a Line from Mr. Partridge.” See the document immediately following.