George Washington Papers
Documents filtered by: Recipient="Estaing, Charles-Hector Théodat, comte d'"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-17-02-0495

From George Washington to Vice Admiral d’Estaing, 20 October 1778

To Vice Admiral d’Estaing

Head Quarters [Fredericksburg] 20th October 1778

Sir.

I had the honor of transmitting to Your Excellency on the 18th instant, some advices which appeared to me very interesting—An intelligent Officer stationed at a proper place for observing the enemys naval movements, in his last report, says—“On the 16th October about twelve Ships fell down to the hook—early on the morning of the 17th about one hundred Ships and Transports exclusive of Sloops Schooners & smaller vessels, fell down to the same place—and from the frequency of signal Guns fired in the course of the same day, it was concluded that many more ships were preparing to follow.[”]1

An orderly book of the enemys which has fallen into our hands confirms the account already communicated to your Excellency of the drafting three Regiments vizt the 10th 45th and 52d to complete others to their full establishment2—it differs only in making the latter amount to nine instead of ten—and is more particular in informing us that in completing these corps no account is to be made of prisoners of War.

The care taken to fill them is a convincing proof to me that these Regiments are destined for some separate service—apart the objections3 which I have already taken the liberty to suggest to Your Excellency—it does not appear to me probable that the enemy would hazard an expedition against such important objects as Your Excellencys Squadron and the town of Boston4—with such a force—and there is no other enterprise for them5 in America; thus reasoning upon the subject corroborated by a variety of concurring intelligence induces a belief that this detachment is intended for the West Indies—It is very probable however that the enemy will leave a naval force superior to that under Your Excellency in order to keep6 it in check—while the transports convoyed by the remainder of their Ships and Frigates will proceed to their destination.7

How far they may be restrained from offensive operations8 by a reinforcement of Ships from France, or any active measures which may be taken by the other branch of the house of Bourbon, Your Excellency best knows9 my Solicitude for the interest of our allies, will plead my excuse for entreating you to give me some light on this subject.

No opportunity shall be lost10 on my part of communicating to Your Excellency every interesting occurrence11 and of proving the attachment and respect with which I have the honor to be Your Excellencys most obedient and most humble Servant

Go: Washington

p.s. Three Brigades are moving eastward to guard against the remotest possibility of Your Excellencys Squadron being the object of the enemys manœuvres.12

LS, in John Laurens’s writing, FrPNA, Fonds de la Marine, ser. 4, vol. 146, ff. 297–98; Df, DLC:GW; Varick transcript, DLC:GW. For significant variations in the wording of the draft text, see notes 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11. GW apparently sent this letter with his letter to William Heath of this date (see Heath to GW, 23 Oct.).

1For this intelligence report from Capt. David Hopkins, see Stirling to GW, 17 October.

2GW is referring to his letter to d’Estaing of 16 October. The orderly book mentioned here has not been identified.

3The draft manuscript also reads: “Apart the objections”; but the Varick transcript reads: “A part of the objections.”

4The draft manuscript reads simply “your Squadron.”

5The draft manuscript reads: “and they have no other object of enterprise.”

6The draft manuscript reads: “with a view of keeping.”

7Maj. Gen. James Grant’s West Indies expedition, which consisted of ten British regiments, sailed from Sandy Hook on 3 November.

8The draft manuscript reads: “from acting offensively.”

9The draft manuscript reads: “is best able to judge.”

10The draft manuscript reads: “missed.”

11The draft manuscript reads: “intelligence.”

12For GW’s ordering of the three brigades of Gates’s division to march as far as Hartford for this purpose, see GW to d’Estaing, 16 Oct., and note 2 to that document, and GW to Gates, 18, 20 October. For GW’s similar orders to the three brigades of McDougall’s division, see General Orders, 19 and 22 Oct., and GW to McDougall, 23 October.

Index Entries