John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, John" AND Period="Washington Presidency"
sorted by: date (ascending)
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-05-02-0133

John Jay’s Charge to the Grand Juries of the Eastern Circuit, 12 April–20 May 1790

John Jay’s Charge to the Grand Juries of the Eastern Circuit

[New York, 12 April–20 May 1790]

The Charge of Chief Justice Jay to

The Grand Juries on the Eastern circuit—

at the Circuit Courts held in the Districts, of New York on the 4th.— of Connecticut on the 22 Day of april, of Massachusets on the 4th. and of New Hampshire on the 20 Day of may 1790.—1

Whether any People can long govern themselves in an equal uniform & orderly manner, is a Question which the advocates for free Governmts. justly consider as being exceedingly important to the cause of Liberty.2 This Question, like others whose Solution depends on Facts, can only be determined by Experience. It is a Question on which many think some Room for doubt still remains. Men have had very few fair opportunities of making the Experiment; and this is one Reason why less Progress has been made in the Science of Government than in almost any other. The far greater parts ^number^ of the constitutions and Governments of which we are informed have originated in Force or in Fraud; having orig been either imposed by improper Exertions of Power, or introduced by the arts of designing Individuals,3 whose apparent Zeal for Liberty & the public good enabled them to take advantage of the credulity and misplaced confidence of their fellow Citizens—

Providence has been pleased to bless the People of this Country with more perfect opportunities of choosing, and more effectual means of establishing their own Government, than any other nation has hitherto enjoyed; and for the use we may make of these opportunities and of these means, we shall be highly responsible to that Providence, as well as to mankind in general, and to our own Posterity in particular. our Deliberations and Proceedings, being unawed and uninfluenced by power or corruption, domestic or foreign, are perfectly free—4 our citizens are generally & greatly enlightened,5 and our country is so extensive that the personal Influence of popular Individuals can rarely embrace large Portions of it. The Institution of General and State Governments, their respective Conveniences and Defects in Practice, and the subsequent alterations made in some of them, have operated as useful Experiments, and conspired to promote our advancement in this interesting Science.6 It is pleasing to observe that the present national Government already affords advantages, which the preceding one proved too feeble and ill constructed to produce. How far it may be still distant from the Degree of Perfection to which it may possibly be carried Time only can decide. It is a consolation to reflect that7 the good Sense of the People will be enabled by Experience to discover and correct its Imperfections; especially while they continue to retain a proper confidence in themselves, and avoid those Jealousies and Dissentions which prevent Improvements often springing from the worst Designs frequently frustrate the best measures.

wise and virtuous men have thought and reasoned very differently respecting Government, but in this they have at Length very unanimously agreed8 vizt. That its Powers should be divided into three, distinct, independent Departments— the Executive legislative and judicial. But how to constitute9 and ballance them in such a manner as best to guard ^against^ Abuse and Fluctuation, & preserve the Constitution from Encroachments,10 are Points on ^which^ there continues to be a great Diversity of opinions, and on which we have all as yet much to learn. The constitution of the United States has accordingly instituted these three Departments, and much Pains have been taken so to form and define them, as that they may operate as checks one on the other, and keep each within its proper Limits— it being universally agreed to be of the last Importance to a free People, that they who are vested with executive legislative & judicial Powers,11 should rest satisfied with their respective Portions of Power, and neither encroach on the Provinces of each other, nor suffer themselves or ^nor^ the others, to intermeddle with the Rights reserved by the constitution to the People.

If then so much depends on12 our rightly improving the before mentioned opportunities— if the most discerning and enlightened minds may be mistaken relative to Theories unconfirmed by Practice— if on such difficult Questions men may differ in opinion and yet be Patriots— and if the merits of our opinions can only be ascertained by Experience, let us patiently abide the Tryal, and unite our Endeavours to render it a fair and an impartial one.

These Remarks13 may not appear very pertinent to the present occasion, and yet it will be readily admitted, that occasions of promoting good will, and good Temper, and the Progress of useful Truths among our Fellow Citizens should not be omitted—

These motives urge me further to observe, that a variety of local & other circumstances rendered the Formation14 of the judicial Department particularly difficult—

We had become a nation— as such we were responsible to others for the observance of the Laws of Nations; and as our national Concerns were to be regulated15 by national Laws, national Tribunals became necessary for the Interpretation & Execution of them both. no Tribunals16 of the like kind and Extent had heretofore existed in this Country— from such therefore no Light of Experience, nor Facilities of usage and Habit were to be derived. our Jurisprudence varied in almost every State, and was accommodated to local not general convenience; to partial not national Policy. This convenience and this Policy were nevertheless to be regarded and tenderly treated. A judicial controul, general & final, was indispensable. The manner of establishing it, with Powers neither too extensive nor too limited; rendering it properly independent, and yet properly amenable, involved Questions of no little Intricacy.17 The Expediency of carrying Justice as it were to every Man’s Door, was obvious; but how to do it in an expedient manner was far from being apparent.

To provide against Discord between national & State Jurisdictions, to render them auxiliary instead of hostile to each other; and so to connect both as to leave each sufficiently independent, and yet sufficiently combined, was and will be arduous.—

Institutions formed under such circumstances should therefore be recieved with candor, and tried with Temper and Prudence—18 It was under these embarrassing Circumstances that the articles in the Constitution on this Subject, as well as the act of congress for establishing the judicial courts of the united States were made & passed.—19

Under the authority of that act, this Court now sits— Its Jurisdiction is twofold, civil & criminal. To the Exercise of the latter you Gentlemen are necessary, and for that purpose are now convened.

The most perfect constitutions, the best Governments, and the wisest Laws are vain, unless well administered and well obeyed. Virtuous Citizens will observe them from a Sense of Duty, but those of an opposite Description can be restrained only by Fear of Disgrace and Punishment. Such being the State of Things, it is essential to the wellfare of Society, and to the Protection of each member of it in the peaceable Enjoyment of his Rights, that offenders be punished.

The End of Punishment however, is not to expiate for offences, but by the Terror of Example to deter men from the commission of them. To render these Examples useful, Policy as well as morality require, not only that Punishment be proportionate to Guilt, but that all Proceedings against Persons accused or suspected, should be accompanied by the Reflection, that they may be innocent. Hence therefore it is proper that dispassionate and careful Inquiry should precede those Rigors which Justice exacts, and which should always be tempered with as much Humanity and Benevolence as the nature of such Cases may admit. Warm partial & precipitate Prosecutions, & cruel and abominable Executions, such as Racks, embowelling, drawing quartering, burning and the like, are no less impolitic than inhuman. They infuse into the public mind Disgust at the barbarous Severity of Government, and fill it with Pity and Partiality for the Sufferers. on the contrary when offenders are prosecuted with Temper and Decency; when they are convicted after impartial Trials; and punished in a manner becoming the Dignity of public Justice to prescrible,20 the Feelings and Sentiments of men will be on the Side of Government, and however disposed they may and ought to be, to regard suffering offenders with compassion, yet the compassion will never be unmixed with a due Degree of Indignation.

we are happy that the Genius of our Laws is mild, and we have abundant Reason to rejoice in possessing one of the best Institutions that ever was devised for bringing offenders to Justice without endangering the Peace and Security of the innocent— I mean that of Grand Juries— Greatly does it tend to promote order and good Government, that in every District there should frequently be assembled a number of the most discreet and respectable citizens in it, who on their oaths are bound to enquire into and present all offences committed against the Laws in such District— and greatly does it tend to the Quiet and Safety of good and peaceful citizens, that no man can be put in Jeopardy for imputed crimes without such previous Inquiry and Presentment—21 The Extent of your District Gentlemen! which is commensurate with the State, necessarily extends your Duty throughout every county in it; and demands proportionable Diligence in your Inquiries, & Circumspection in your Presentments.

The objects of your Inquiry are all offences committed against the Laws of the United States in this District, or on the high Seas by Persons now in the District. You will recollect that the Laws of nations make Part of the Laws of this, and of every other civilized nation. They consist of those Rules for regulating the conduct of nations towards each other, which resulting from right Reason, recieve their obligation from that Principle and from general assent and Practice. To this Head also belong those Rules or Laws which by agreement become established between particular nations, and of this kind are Treaties Conventions, and the like Compacts. as in private Life a fair and legal contract between two men, cannot be altered or annulled nor altered by either without the consent of the other, so neither can Treaties between nations. States and Legislatures may repeal their regulating Statutes, but they cannot repeal their Bargains. Hence it is that Treaties fairly made and concluded are perfectly obligatory, and ought to be punctually observed. We are now a nation, and it equally becomes us to perform our Duties, as to assert our Rights.

The penal Statutes of the united States are few, and principally respect the Revenue— The right ordering and management of this important Business is very essential to the Credit, Character and Prosperity22 of our country. On the citizens at large is placed the Burthen of providing for the public Exigencies— whoever therefore fraudulently withdraws his Shoulder from the common Burthen, necessarily leaves his Portion of the weight to be borne by the others, and thereby does Injustice not only to the public in general ^Government^, but to them.

Direct your attention also to the conduct of the national officers, and let not Frau any corruptions Frauds Extortions or criminal Negligences with which you may find any of them justly chargeable pass unnoticed. In a word Gentlemen your Province and your Duty23 extend (as has been before observed) to the Inquiry and Presentment of all offences of every kind committed against the united States in this District or on the high Seas by Persons in it. If in the performance of your Duty you should meet with Difficulties, the court will be ready to afford you proper assistance—

It cannot be too strongly impressed on the minds of us all, how greatly our individual Prosperity depends on our national Prosperity; and how greatly our national Prosperity depends on a well organized vigorous Government, ruling by wise and equal Laws, faithfully executed— nor is such a Governmt. unfriendly to Liberty— to that Liberty which is really inestimable. on the contrary, nothing but a strong Government of Laws, irresistably bearing down arbitrary power & Licenciousness can defend it against those two formidable Enemies. Let it be remembered that ^civil^ Liberty consists not in a Right to every Man to do just what he pleases— but it consists in an equal Right to all the citizens to have, enjoy, and to do, in peace Security and without molestation, whatever the equal and constitutional Laws of the country admit to be consistant with the public good. It is the Duty and the Interest therefore of all good Citizens, in their several Stations, to support the Laws and the Government which thus protect their Rights and Liberties. I am persuaded Gentlemen that you will chearfully & faithfully perform the Task24 now assigned You, and I forbear, by additional Remarks, to detain you longer from it—

AD, NNC (EJ: 08125). Endorsed: “Charge to Grand Jury, 1790.” Dft, PC, Kenneth W. Rendell, Inc. Significant variations between the two texts are indicated in the endnotes below. Printed, with minor variations in text: Independent Chronicle (Boston), 27 May; Massachusetts Centinel (Boston), 29 May; Osborne’s New-Hampshire Spy (Portsmouth), 2 June; New-Hampshire Gazette (Portsmouth), 3 June; Cumberland Gazette (Portland, Maine), 7 June; Daily Advertiser (New York), 9 June; New-York Packet, 10 June; Poughkeepsie Journal, 12 June; Pennsylvania Packet (Philadelphia), 15 June; Gazette of the United States (New York), 16 June; Hampshire Gazette (Northampton, Mass.), 16 June; New-York Journal, and Patriotic Register, 18 Nov. 1790. Reprinted as The Charge of Chief Justice Jay to the Grand Juries on the Eastern Circuit (Portsmouth, N.H.: George Jerry Osbourne, Jr., 1790; Early Am. Imprints description begins Early American Imprints, series 1: Evans, 1639–1800 [microform; digital collection], edited by American Antiquarian Society, published by Readex, a division of Newsbank, Inc. Accessed: Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 2006–16, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/; Early American Imprints, series 2: Shaw-Shoemaker, 1801–1819 [microform; digital collection], edited by American Antiquarian Society, published by Readex, a division of Newsbank, Inc. Accessed: Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 2006–16, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/ description ends , no. 22587). JJ apparently made the charge available for printing after he completed the circuit and returned to Boston on 24 May. DHSC description begins Maeva Marcus et al. eds., The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789–1800 (8 vols.; New York, 1985–2007) description ends , 2: 25. On the role and significance of charges to grand juries, see the editorial note “Riding the Circuit,” above.

1The dates listed at the beginning of the report, and also on the title page of the pamphlet publication, are not entirely accurate. The Circuit Court did not meet in New York until 5 Apr. 1790, adjourned after directing the summoning of a grand jury, and did not meet again until 12 Apr., when the grand jury met and JJ delivered his address. JJ also delivered this charge at the District of Connecticut, New Haven, 22 Apr.; District of Massachusetts, Boston, 3 May (not 4 May); and the District of New Hampshire, Portsmouth, 20 May 1790. See DHSC description begins Maeva Marcus et al. eds., The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789–1800 (8 vols.; New York, 1985–2007) description ends , 2: 23, 25–30, 49, 70, and, for the responses, 61, 113–14; and Herald of Freedom (Boston), 4 May 1790.

2The opening paragraph does not appear in the Dft. The second paragraph to this point reads in the Dft: “It has long been a question ^much agitated & of great Importance to the political Happiness of Men^ whether any People can govern themselves in an equal uniform and orderly manner—”.

3JJ wrote “Men” in the Dft.

4In the Dft JJ here wrote: “Providence has been pleased to bless the People of this Country with means & opportunities of providing for their own Governmt. in the way more agreable to their Judgmt.& wishes. Our measures ^for that purpose^ have neither been dictated nor controuled by foreign power, nor much affected by foreign Influence—”.

5For similar references to “a Degree of Intelligence & Information in the Mass of our People,” see JJ to TJ, 8 Sept. 1787; and The Federalist 3, [before 3 Nov. 1787], JJSP description begins Elizabeth M. Nuxoll et al., eds., The Selected Papers of John Jay (4 vols. to date; Charlottesville, Va., 2010–) description ends , 4: 544, 589, 593; and JJ to David Hartley, 14 Dec. 1789, above.

6Here in the Dft JJ wrote: “We have already made several Experiments, ^&^ the Result of which ^them^ greatly ^has^ increased our Knowledge—”. The first six words of the next sentence do not appear in the Dft.

7The previous sentence and the first seven words of this sentence do not appear in the Dft. The remainder of this sentence in the Dft reads: “the good-sense of the people will from time to time discover its imperfections, and be enabled by further Experience to correct and amend them; especially while they continue to retain a proper Confidence in themselves, & avoid those Jealousies and Dissensions which oppose Improvements, and which often spring from the worst Designs, are always unfriendly to the best measures.”

8Here in the Dft JJ reworked this sentence as: “The best and Wiseest ^and virtuous^ men have held ^thought & reasoned^ very differently opinions on ^respecting^ the Subject ^Formation^ of Governmt., but in this particular Proposition they have at length very unanimously agreed—”.

9JJ wrote “construct” in the Dft.

10In the Dft JJ excised “Violations” before interlining “Encroachments”.

11JJ wrote “authority” in the Dft.

12“These remarks shew the Importance of” in the Dft; later in the paragraph JJ used the pronoun “their” where “our” appears in this text, and wrote “they should” where “let us” now appears.

13“Observations” in the Dft.

14In the Dft JJ wrote: “conspired to render the Institution”.

15In the Dft JJ reworked this passage as “and ^as our^ national measures ^Concerns^ ordained ^were to be regulated by^ national Laws”.

16Here in the Dft JJ excised “former systems of the like kind” before interlining “tribunals of the like kind and extent” and “had heretofore existed”.

17In the Dft JJ excised “much difficulty” before interlining “no little Intricacy”.

18Here in the Dft JJ excised: “Experience will point out defects and teach us how to remedy them.”

19At the beginning of the next paragraph JJ excised: “The nature and objects of that Act were fully and publickly explained in the late District court— a similar Detail cannot now be necessary”.

20“prescribe” in Dft and printed texts.

21A presentment is a “written notice taken by a grand jury of any offense, from their own knowledge or observation, without any bill of indictment laid before them at the suit of the government.” It is an informal written statement that “a public offense has been committed which is triable in the county, and that there is reasonable ground for believing that a particular individual named or described therein has committed it.” Black’s Law Dictionary description begins Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd ed. (St. Paul, Minn., 1910) description ends , 2nd ed.

22“Credit Honor and welfare” in the Dft.

23JJ did not include “and your Duty” in the Dft.

24Here in the Dft JJ excised “do the Duties” and interlined “perform the Task”.

Index Entries