[3 May 1756]
At a Genl Court Martial held at Winchester May 2d [3d] 1756
Capt. Robert Steuart, President.
|Capt. Woodward||Capt. Spotswood|
|Capt. Lewis||Capt. Harrisson|
|Lieut. Stark||Members||Capt. Bullett|
|Lieut. Blagg||Lieut. Eustace|
|Lieut. Lomax||Lieut. Williams|
|Lieut. Lowry||Lieut. King|
Serjeant Nathan Lewis accused for retreating with a party of Men without orders and not going to the assistance of Capt. John Mercer when Engaged with the Indians the 18th April nigh Edwards Fort.1
Lieut. Lemon first Evidce Sworn, says he order’d Serjt Lewis to go out with him from the Fort with about thirty men which he carrd out and at the same time order’d Lewis shou’d go upon the right with a few of them and so keep up with him as to be able to join him upon an attack—But after marching a small Distance he found himself Deserted by half his men together with Lewis Mr Lemon continued his March till he overtook Lieut. Williams, when the Engagement Began—But Lewis was not there and was found in the Fort on return.
Serjt Sallard Sworn says, Serjt Lewis Left the Fort when the other Party Did, and return’d to the Fort a Little before them.
John Beard2 Sworn says Serjt Lewis ask’d him and the other Soldiers with him to go upon the right of Lieut. Lemons party and that they went about a mile which brought them nigher the Fort, and seeing a Dog they Persued him then hearing Guns fire the[y] Consulted what to do and seeing Mr Blaggs party joind them. and that Lewis and he was never out of the Pasture till they joind Lieut. Blaggs party on their retreat The Deponent says that Lewis seem’d very willing to join Lieut. Blaggs party.
John Whiffle3 Sworn says that he and Lewis and the others, march’d up the Pasture, after Leaving Lieut. Lemons party there they heard some Guns fired, and s⟨to⟩pt sometime consulting what to do Lewis was ask’d, if they had not best join the party Engaged to which he answer’d t’was Dangerous and they might be shot by their own Men as well as the Indians, as they knew not which side they were Engaged upon, they afterwards seeing a party come out of the Fort the Deponent ask’d Lewis, if he wou’d not join them. but he said it was too Late and that they woud retreat before they coud join them—he further says several of the men run to Lieut. Blaggs party and he and Lewis being Left, they return’d to the Fort.
Serjt Lewis in Defence says that Lieut. Lemon orderd him to go up a Valley on the right (which Lieut. Lemon Denies, as allso that there was such a Valley) with Lemon,4 he there March’d and Expected to meet with Mr Lemon, as he had promised to join him at the Head of the Valley (which Lieut. Lemon also denie⟨s)⟩ But when he came there he went in Persuit of an Indian Dog wch he saw.
Its the unanimous opinion of the Court that Serjt Lewis’s conduct is a man[i]fest Breach of the 12th Article of War 14th Section ( (Viz.) whatsoever officer of Soldie[r] shall Misbehave himself before the Enemy, or shamefully abandon any post committed to his Charge or shall speek Words inducing others to do the Like shall suffer Death)—and merits the punishment thereby inflicted.
|H. Woodward||Robert Stewart P[residen]t|
|Robert Spotswood||approv’d by Sir Yr Hble Servt|
|Charles Lewis||Go: Washington|
DS, ViHi: Dinwiddie Papers; LB, DLC:GW. The signed copy in the Dinwiddie Papers is dated 2 May and docketed “report of a Court Martial from Coll Washington to Govr Dinwiddie May 2d 1756.” GW’s letter-book copy is dated 3 May, which is correct. The error may have arisen from the fact that the hearings for Lewis began on 2 May. See GW’s Evening Orders, 2 May. The material in angle brackets has been taken from the letter-book copy. There are a number of minor differences in the two copies.
2. John Beard of Thomas Cocke’s company was a 20–year-old Englishman who enlisted in the Virginia Regiment in Stafford County in March 1755.
3. A John Whipple appeared on a list made 21 Oct. 1755 of Capt. William Cocks’s company of rangers. He was a mason from Pennsylvania, 21 years old, and had enlisted the month before.
4. The letter-book copy reads “with four men” in place of “with Mr Lemon.”