To James Madison
Philadelphia Mar. 15. 98
I wrote you last on the 2d. inst. your’s of the 4th. is now at hand. the public papers will give you the news of Europe. the French decree making the vessel friendly or enemy according to the hands by which the cargo was manufactured has produced a great sensation among the merchants here. it’s operation is not yet perhaps well understood; but probably it will put our shipping out of competition because British bottoms which can come under convoy will alone be trusted with return cargoes. our’s losing this benefit would need a higher freight out, in which therefore they will be underbid by the British. they must then retire from the competition. some no doubt will try other channels of commerce and return cargoes from other countries. this effect would be salutary. a very well informed merchant too (a Scotsman entirely in the English trade) told me he thought it would have another good effect, by checking & withdrawing our over-extensive commerce & navign (the fruit of our neutral position) within those bounds to which peace must necessarily bring them. that this being done by degrees will probably prevent those numerous failures produced generally by a peace coming on suddenly. notwithstanding this decree the sentiments of the merchants become more & more cooled & settled down against arming. yet it is believed the Representatives do not cool: and tho’ we think the question against arming will be carried, yet probably by a majority of only 4. or 5. their plan is to have convoys furnished for our vessels’ going to Europe, & smaller vessels for the coasting defence. on this condition they will agree to fortify Southern harbours & build some gallies. it has been concluded among them, that if war takes place, Woolcot is to be retained in office, that the P. must give up Mc.Henry; & as to Pickering they are divided, the Eastern men being determined to retain him, their middle & Southern brethren wishing to get rid of him. they have talked of Genl. Pinckney as successor to Mc.Henry. this information is certain. however I hope that we shall avoid war & save them the trouble of a change of ministry. the P. has nominated J. Q. Adams Commissioner Plenipoty. to renew the treaty with Sweden. Tazewell made a great stand against it on the general ground that we should let our treaties drop, & remain without any. he could only get 8. votes against 20. a trial will be made to day in another form which he thinks will give 10. or 11. against 16. or 17. declaring the renewal inexpedient. in this case, notwithstanding the nomination has been confirmed, it is supposed the P. would perhaps not act under it, on the probability that more than a third would be against the ratification. I believe however that he would act, & that a third could not be got to oppose the ratification. it is acknoleged we have nothing to do but to decide the question about arming. yet not a word is said about adjourning, and some even talk of continuing the session permanently; others talk of July & August. an effort however will soon be made for an early adjournment. my friendly salutations to mrs Madison, to yourself affectionate Adieux.
RC (DLC: Madison Papers); addressed: “James Madison junr. near Orange Courthouse”; franked. PrC (DLC).
Their plan: see Notes on Conversations with Abraham Baldwin, John Brown, and John Hunter, 11 Mch. 1798.
During two days of closed executive proceedings following President Adams’s 12 Mch. naming of his son, John Quincy Adams, as commissioner, Henry Tazewell made a great stand against the nomination and moved that the Senate “not advise and consent to the appointment of a commissioner.” A question of order being raised, TJ argued “that on a message of appointment from the President, the Senate can answer only yea or nay, viz. that they do, or do not approve the appointment of J. Q. Adams. They cannot amend or modify, as by saying they do not approve the appointment of a commissioner &c.” The Senate confirmed the appointment on 14 Mch. (PW description begins Wilbur S. Howell, ed., Jefferson’s Parliamentary Writings, Princeton, 1988, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Second Series description ends , 13–15; JEP description begins Journal of the Executive Proceedings of the Senate of the United States … to the Termination of the Nineteenth Congress, Washington, D.C., 1828 description ends , 1:265–6). For the decision to postpone Tazewell’s effort to declare the renewal of the treaty inexpedient, see TJ to Madison, 21 Mch. Tazewell gave an account of his opposition to John Q. Adams’s appointment in a letter to Madison of 18 Mch. 1798 (see Madison, Papers description begins William T. Hutchinson, Robert A. Rutland, J. C. A. Stagg, and others, eds., The Papers of James Madison, Chicago and Charlottesville, 1962, 27 vols. Sec. of State Ser., 5 vols. description ends , 17:94–5).