To the Gentlemen at Nantes2
LS3 and copy: Library of Congress
Passy, April 8th. 1779
Great Objections having been made by the honble. Mr Arthur Lee to the Accounts of Mr Jonathan Williams late Agent for the Commissioners at Nantes, which are therefore yet unsettled, and as not being conversant in mercantile Business, I cannot well judge of them, and therefore, as well as for other Reasons, I did not and cannot undertake to examine them myself, and they may be better examined at Nantes where the Business was transacted than either here or in America. I beg the Favour of you, Gentlemen, that you would for the Sake of Justice and of the Public Good, take that Trouble upon you; and make Report to me thereupon. Which I do hereby agree shall be conclusive and final (subject only to the Revision of Congress) in case Mr Williams shall previously sign an Engagement to abide thereby. If it should not suit you all to attend to this Business, I shall be content with the Judgment of as many of you as can and will attend it, the Number not being less than three. If an equal Number undertake it, and should be divided in their Opinions, I request them to join in chusing an Umpire, that the Matter may be concluded. I did desire Mr Lee, if he had any further Objections to furnish you with them; But he has in a Letter to me declined it.4
I have the Honour to be, with great Respect, Gentlemen, Your most obedient humble Servant
Notations in different hands: His Excellency Benjamin Franklin to Messieurs J. Wharton M. Ridley J. Johnson M. Mease J. Ross J Nesbit J Cuming J. Gridley & J D Schweighauser Passy April 8. 1779 / a letter from Benjn. Franklin.
2. BF wrote this letter in response to JW’s request, on March 23, that he write a second time to the Gentlemen, empowering any group of at least three of them to arbitrate JW’s accounts. The first half of this letter duplicates BF’s previous one to the Gentlemen, above, March 13. The new ending begins with the phrase “If it should not suit you”.
3. In the hand of WTF.
4. See Lee’s letter of March 16.
5. In BF’s hand.
6. The list of addressees kept changing, according to the merchants’ mobility and their willingness to serve on such a committee. The names of W. and D. Blake, Fendall, Lloyd, and Ogilvie had been dropped since BF’s letter of March 13; letters of refusal from W. Blake and Fendall are above, March 20 and 21. Although Matthew Mease was not included in the list of addressees for BF’s March 13 letter, he was a part of the original group: XXVIII, 57n. Merchants newly included on the list are James Cuming (XXVIII, 206), Joseph Gridley (see his letter of March 17, above), and Jonathan Nesbitt (XXVI, 12–13n).