Montezillo June 26th. 1825
My dear Nephew
Dr Jarvis with great truth and propriety observes that “the Religion of the Indians has not been Scrutinized as it Should be.” Nor has the Religion of any other nation, from Jonah the Chaldean to the Kingdoms of Whidah and Ashantee been Sufficiently invigorated. Who knows any thing of the religion of the wild negroes in Africa, but the infernal cruelty of their Sacrifices? It is probable that the Religion of the Universe for many thousands of years was astrological: and We know Somewhat too much of the Uses which were made of it by magicians and Jugglers in all ages. Dr Jarvis has assigned Some good causes of the too general inattention to the religion of the indians. But those causes do not apply to the negroes. We have thousands if not millions of them domesticated with Us. We might examine them. But who asks them a question? Or who Studies their languages? They have probably as great a variety of tongues as the indians. Nations who have neither Records nor histories nor letters, have fables and traditions and dogmas which have meanings or [. . .], worth Searching if they can be found, Why are not Bibles translated into negro and Sent to the gold coast?
My learned ingenious eloquent and amiable friend and next door neighbour when I lived in the white house in [braver] Square, Dr Samuel Cooper, had a negro fellow named Glasgow, who Seemed as harmless and almost as mindless as an idiot. Nevertheless his master endeavored to instruct him in the Christian religion. He began by reading and explaing the history in Genesis of the fall of man. Glasgow listened with great Attention and astonishment for a long time: but at last he broke Silence. "Master! We have a different account of this matter in my country." Aye indeed what is that account? "We Say that in the beginning, the lot of the world was put upon a race between a dog and a toad. If the dog came out first, the world was to be good and happy. If the toad, all was to be wicked and Sorrowfull. Every body rejoiced. Surely the dog would winn. But when they Started the dog had ran a great Way before the toad had hopped a rod. But about half Way the evil Spirit threw a bone before the dog who turned aside to gnaw it, while the toad hopped on and got out first." Dr Cooper has repeatedly related this Annecdote to me.
Is not this the history of the loss of Paradise translated into Negro?
There is the Same dulness of Understanding the Same imbecillity of Virtue against Appetite in the dog that there was in Eve and Adam. The Same ruin to the World though ascribed to chance not to fault. The Same personification of Evil in the temptor. It is as rational an attempt to Account for the origin of Evil as that of the great Frederick, Soames Jennings or Dr Edwards. Secret things belong not to Us.
I doubt not that many curious things might be pumped out of the Negroes if any pains were taken.
I am your affectionate Uncle