Thomas Boylston Adams to William Smith Shaw, 20 September 1801
Thomas Boylston Adams to William Smith Shaw
Philadelphia 20th: September 1801.
Dear William
I have your letter of the 14th: with a paper for which I thank you.1 Mr: Reed, has written to you, in consequence of the information respecting the demur, about delivering his trunk, and contrary to my advice, has sent money to pay Bills, which he says he had already, once discharged.2 I never will recommend any of my friends to that vile house so help me, truth!
Since my return, I have been more occupied with my profession than I had been, for a long time before, though with little immediate profit. My ambition does not aspire to any thing out of the pale of Bar promotion, but it is by no means an easy task to attain eminence in this sphere. The number of competitors added to the difficult and laborious duties in the exercise of our profession, make it a perfect lottery as to success & profit. Every opportunity I get, of holding forth, at the Bar, invigorates zeal, but I have not yet vanquished the terrors & palpitations incident to inexperienced speakers.
During the session of our Supreme Court, we have had some interesting trials & arguments. The case of Pickering vs Reynolds, for a libel was heard a second time, but before the trial was finished, one of the jurors, (a democrat) took sick; the Court adjourned and the juryman was unable to attend during the term. The jury therefore was discharged and another trial must be had. Brown & Relf; who were arraigned on an Indictment for a libel upon Dallas, which was removed to the Sup: Court, plead guilty; or submitted with leave to give matter of extenuation in evidence; the Court sentenced them to pay a fine of three hundred dollars each, the costs of prosecution & bound them over to good behavior for one year—3 So much for this Brimborion.
The ex-ambassador has had a long confab with the port folio-man and I trust it will be profitable to him.4 He has been seriously addressed by several of his warmest friends, and promises reformation.
I spoke to Dickins about sending your paper.
By this or the next Mail I shall send under cover to my father some papers for Mr: Gay, upon business; you will please to deliver them.5
Your friends are all well here. When you write to your good mother, please to remember me kindly to her, and tell her, I hope we shall some day or other meet again, even in this vale of tears, though I hope on no mournful occasion.
Love to Mr: and Mrs: Foster / Your friend
T B Adams.6
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William. S. Shaw. / Boston”; internal address: “W. S Shaw”; docketed: “1801 / Sept 20.”
1. Not found.
2. Possibly Joseph Reed Jr. (1772–1846), Princeton 1792, a Pennsylvania lawyer ( , 5:211, 214, 215, 216).
3. On 12 Sept. Dr. James Reynolds was tried for libel in the Penn. Supreme Court for authoring a 24 Jan. 1798 piece in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser accusing Timothy Pickering of fraud, for which see vol. 12:371. Reynolds had first been prosecuted in March 1801, but the trial ended in a hung jury. This second trial ended in a mistrial. In a second case before the court, the editors of the Philadelphia Gazette, Andrew Brown Jr. and Samuel Relf, were convicted on 16 Sept. of libeling Alexander James Dallas. In addition to the sentence noted by TBA, they were instructed to “keep the peace” and deliver bonds of $3,000. On 28 Sept. Brown retired and Relf assumed editorial control of the newspaper (Samuel Hodgdon to Pickering, 16 Sept., MHi:Timothy Pickering Papers; , 3:308–312; Philadelphia Gazette, 14 March, 29 Sept.; , 1:458; Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 16 Sept.).
4. JQA spent the afternoon of 10 Sept. with Joseph Dennie Jr. (D/JQA/24, APM Reel 27).
5. Probably Ebenezer Gay (1771–1842), Harvard 1789, a Boston lawyer ( , 2:266; , p. 48, No. 37024).
6. TBA wrote again to Shaw on 15 Oct., commenting on William Duane’s trial and noting that in his efforts to represent himself Duane “blundered & stumbled a great while” (MWA:Adams Family Letters).