Adams Papers

Thomas Boylston Adams to John Adams, 1 November 1800

Thomas Boylston Adams to John Adams

Philadelphia 1st: November 1800.

Dear Sir.

The morning after you left this place, the Aurora was filled with five columns & an half, from T. Coxe; wherein he undertakes to detail another private conversation, which passed between him and Mr: Dennie, during his last visit to the City, & while he lodged in the same house with Dennie & myself. It is hardly necessary to observe, that this, like all other details from the same source, is grossly incorrect, as to both fact & inference. Judge Chipman’s name is introduced in a manner altogether unwarranted by the reality; altho Mr: D—— disclaims any recollection of his having introduced the name of that Gentleman. At all events, he positively denies having quoted Judge Chipman, as an advocate for a Government of King Lords & Commons, in this Country, because he intimately knows, that the Judge, dislikes many parts of the British Constitution as administered, which he has shewn in his own book— As to the connection of your name in this conversation & discussion, Mr: Dennie, asserts that Mr: Coxe’s interpretation is entirely false & unfair. I was not present when this conversation took place—indeed none of our fellow lodgers were disposed to listen, except by compulsion; as was in a degree the case with Dennie, to a talk of three hours & an half, in the forenoon, upon forms & modes of government & upon the various opinions of them entertained by men of talents in this Country. I know however that the conversation was on a morning subsequent to the evening that Mr: Dennie told Mr. Coxe to his face, (good naturedly enough to be sure) that he was a political apostate— This talk therefore was held the next morning, for the purpose of convincing D—— that he had mistaken his character & conduct.

Dennie has been advised & persuaded by many, to come out in reply; at least so far as he is accused of implicating the opinions of other people. After due reflection, I believe he has come to a determination, not to write a word on the subject. He disdains having any controul over the political department of Waynes Gazette— He has never written any of the squibs & paragraphs against Coxe, of which he complains, & therefore does not hold himself responsible to the man against whom they were levelled.1

I have recommended silence to him on the occasion, altho’ I think there would be no harm in rectifying the misrepresentation as to Judge Chipman.

This morning Tench appears again, in six fine spun, monotonous columns, in answer to your letter.2 It is any thing else but an answer— The press literally groans under the burthen of his communications, and the public, I think must be weary of tolerating his everlasting impertinence— Who is Tench Coxe, that he should attract to himself in the public newspapers, the notice of the whole Continent? The public will know him better & better, & he has a thirst for notoriety. I am apt to believe this will be the only reward & gratification he will obtain.

I presume you can see the Aurora, from the Office of State, but least you should not, I will enclose some of the full ones.

I rejoyce to see the selection of characters, for Electors made by the Legislature of New Jersey—3 It reflects honor upon the State.

From So Carolina, accounts are more favorable than expected a federalist in the room of Major Pinckney & a great majority of the Charleston members of State Legislature, federal, to the exclusion of Several democrats.4

I hear nothing from my Mother since you passed—

With great attachment, I am / Your Son

T B Adams—

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “The President of the United States / City of Washington”; internal address: “The President of the U S.”; endorsed by William Smith Shaw: “T B Adams Esqr / rec 4 Nov.”

1The Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 30 Oct., printed a 27 Oct. essay by Tench Coxe recounting a conversation with Joseph Dennie Jr. during which Coxe called JA “an English Whig” who believed in a bicameral legislature and a sovereign. Coxe alleged that during the conversation Dennie attributed the same belief to Nathaniel Chipman. Chipman (1752–1843), Yale 1777, a Vermont senator who previously had served as chief justice of the Vt. Supreme Court, was the author of Sketches of the Principles of Government, Rutland, Vt., 1793, Evans, description begins Charles Evans and others, American Bibliography: A Chronological Dictionary of All Books, Pamphlets and Periodical Publications Printed in the United States of America [1639–1800], Chicago and Worcester, Mass., 1903–1959; 14 vols.; rev. edn., www.readex.com. description ends No. 25297. The Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 1, 4, 5, 8, 12 Nov., subsequently criticized Coxe, characterizing him on 1 Nov. as “a slave to ambition” (Biog. Dir. Cong. description begins Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, 1774–2005, Washington, D.C., 2005; rev. edn., bioguide.congress.gov. description ends ). For Dennie’s editorial influence on the Gazette of the United States, see TBA to William Smith Shaw, 22 Aug., and note 1, above.

2Coxe continued his condemnation of JA in the Aurora, 1 Nov., framing his comments as a response to the publication of JA’s May 1792 letter to him and tracing the deterioration of his relationship with JA to the “mental alienation” he experienced after reading JA’s Defence of the Const. description begins John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America, London, 1787–1788; repr. New York, 1971; 3 vols. description ends in 1794.

3The Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 31 Oct. 1800, announced New Jersey’s seven presidential electors, all of whom were Federalists who would ultimately vote for JA and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney (A New Nation Votes). For the electioneering that preceded the selection of the state’s electors, see TBA to JQA, 25 Feb., and note 8, above.

4Thomas Pinckney declined to seek reelection to Congress, and Federalist Thomas Lowndes was elected in his stead on 14 October. The state’s legislative elections took place at the same time, and fourteen of the fifteen candidates elected had ties to Federalist Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, who was reelected to the S.C. senate. The Philadelphia Gazette, 29 Oct., said of the legislative contest, “There can be no doubt also, of the Federal list for Representatives having a handsome majority” (Philadelphia Gazette, 20 Oct.; A New Nation Votes; N. Louise Bailey, Mary L. Morgan, and Carolyn R. Taylor, Biographical Directory of the South Carolina Senate, 1776–1985, 3 vols., Columbia, S.C., 1986; Charleston, S.C., City Gazette, 14, 18 Oct.).

Index Entries