To James Madison from Chapman Johnson, 3 October 1827
From Chapman Johnson
Bear Wallow, 3. October 1827.
Dear Sir,
I have received your letter of the 24. September, communicating Mr. Longs wish to resign his office in the University, at the end of the present session.
I feel disposed to act as liberally towards Mr. Long, on this occasion as our duty to the institution will allow; but I doubt whether we should be justified in giving an unconditional assent to his leaving us, at the end of the session. I am quite willing to say to him, that we will accept his resignation, at the time proposed, provided we can, in the mean time, procure a fit successor, and that we will use our best endeavours to procure one. If this conditional arrangement will suit Mr. Longs purposes, I yield my assent to it; but at present, I am unwilling to go further.
In consequence of what passed at our last meeting, on the subject of doctor Jones of Philadelphia, I wrote, on my return home, to obtain information of his fitness for our vacant chair of Nat. philosophy. Instead of testimonials in favor of doctr. Jones, I received from doctr. Horner, very strong recommendations of doctor Robert M. Patterson, now professor of Nat. philosophy, in the University of Pennsylvania. I was much pleased with what I could learn of his character and qualifications, but after some correspondence with him he has declined being a candidate for the office. I send you an extract from his last letter to me,1 in which you will see that he has a favorable opinion of doctor Jones and recommends him for the office. With very great respect Your obt. Set.
C. Johnson
RC and enclosure (DLC). Cover docketed by JM: “recd. Ocr. 21”; postmarked at Staunton, Virginia, 6 Oct. For enclosure, see n. 1.
1. The enclosure is a two-page extract from Robert M. Patterson to Johnson, 8 Sept. 1827, detailing Thomas P. Jones’s experience as a professor at the College of William and Mary and at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia. Patterson concluded: “I have no doubt of Dr. Jones’s entire competence to fulfil all the duties, which you attach to the chair of Natural Philosophy. His language is correct, his elocution very respectable, he has a perfect acquaintance with instruments, being himself a good practical Mechanician, and he is a neat and successful experimenter. […] Dr. Jones’s manners, are quite agreeable and gentlemanly, and such, I think, as would make him popular and respected among the students. His moral character is unexceptionable.”