Francis Dana to Abigail Adams, 23 June 1798
Francis Dana to Abigail Adams
Ipswich June 23d: 1798—
Madam
While on the circuit here, I have received the enclosed letter from my friend Mr: Stedman of Lancaster, brother in law to Mrs: Dana— Finding that the Gentleman mentioned in it, is personally known to the President & yourself, and has been likewise recommended by Judge Cranch, it is altogether needless for me to trouble you further than by laying that letter before you—1 Indeed I am loth to do even that much, a business of the sort not being consonant to my disposition.
I most heartily congratulate the President & yourself, on the return of Genl: Marshal, which must relieve him from much anxiety, as he will now be able to obtain a most perfect knowledge respecting that mission— This event, I trust in God, will prepare Congress to go all lengths in the indispensable defense of our Country, & to begin by immediately annulling our Treaty & consular Convention with France— The people are prepared for all this, & more, at the present moment. They seem to demand it of Congress, & in my opinion, our salvation depends upon it. Delay is political death to us. We must instantaneously rid our Country of all Frenchmen, & suppress all opposition to governmental measures essential to our preservation. This must be considered as sedition & treason, and wherever lurking be feretted out. To attempt to reason it down is vain.
This much I had written when Talleyrands communication to our
Commissioners came to hand. The French Directory have “smoothed the way to discussion”
by declaring themselves “disposed to treat with that one of the three Commissioners,
whose opinions, preformed to be more impartial, promise, in the course of events explanations, a greater share of that mutual
confidence which is indispensably required.”2 Good God! Is such our lot? Here, Madam, my
reflections shall end on this head.
But all will be safe, for Mr: Thatcher has moved in Congress that 2000, & Mr: Harper that 5000 copies of our Commissioners reply, shou’d be printed: And the latter Gentleman has declared that “within a few days past, he was induced to believe, that a conspiracy hostile to the Government of the United States actually existed; & pledged himself as soon as possible to develop its nature, & bring its Agents to condign punishment, having hold of certain threads which he trusted wou’d finally lead to its discovery.”3
Thus the net is sprung before the Game is secured; but untill his Threads are wrought into halters, & actual Traitors are seized instead of being denounced, there can be no safety for our Country To talk or to reason about it, is to trifle with our very existence. The fate of Switzerland stares us in the face. “Oh save my Country Heaven shall be my last.”4 Had Switzerland hearkened to the sage & solemn Council of their Countryman Vattel, she might still have preserved her Independence “If any one, says he, wou’d ravage from a Nation, an essential right, or a right without which it cou’d not hope to subsist; if an ambitious neighbour threatens the liberty of a Republic; if he resolves to subdue it, & bring it into subjection, that Republic will take council only from its courage. It will not even attempt to wait the method of conferences on so odious a pretension; it will bring into this quarrel all its efforts, its last resources, & all the best blood it is capable of shedding. It is risking every thing, only to listen to the least proposition: then they might truly say Una salus—nullam sperare salutem.5 And if fortune is not favorable, a free people will prefer death to servitude. What wou’d have become of Rome, had she listened to timid councils, when Hannibal was encamped before her Walls. The Swiss, always so ready to embrace pacific measures, or to submit to those that are reasonable, in disputes less essential, constantly reject every idea of composition with those who have a design on their Liberties. &c.”6
I remain dear Madam / with much respect & esteem / Your most obedient humble Servant
FRA DANA7
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Madam Adams / Philadelphia”; internal address: “Madam Adams”; endorsed: “Judge Dana / June 23 1798.”
1. Neither the letter nor a recommendation of William Stedman by Richard Cranch has been found. Stedman (1765–1831), Harvard 1784, was married to Elizabeth Ellery Dana’s sister Almy. He was a lawyer and town clerk of Lancaster, Mass., and later served in Congress from 1803 until 1810. Stedman had studied law under Theophilus Parsons just before JQA began his own training in Parsons’ office (vol. 7:439; ; , 2:145, 146).
2. Talleyrand’s letter to the American commissioners was printed in the Massachusetts Mercury, 22 June 1798.
3. After Congress received JA’s 18 June message submitting Talleyrand’s letter and the commissioners’ response, George Thatcher and Robert Goodloe Harper moved to have copies of the dispatches printed. Both Thatcher and Harper referred to a conspiracy of French agents, such as Benjamin Franklin Bache, operating in the United States to undermine the federal government ( , 5th Cong., 2d sess., p. 1972–1973; Boston Russell’s Gazette, 25 June).
4. Alexander Pope, Moral Essays, Epistle I, line 265.
5. Dana was quoting from Virgil, Aeneid, Book II, line 354: “Nothing can save the conquered but the knowledge that they cannot now be saved” (transl. W. F. Jackson Knight, N.Y., 1958, p. 61).
6. Emmerich de Vattel, Law of Nations, Book II, ch. xviii, sec. 332.
7. Dana wrote to AA again on 22 July, noting his agreement with JQA that the country ought to pursue “a general system of maritime Neutrality” with the other neutral nations of Europe. He also voiced his hope that Elbridge Gerry’s stay in Paris would convince the French government of the futility of its attempts to influence the United States (Adams Papers).