Adams Papers

From Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 17 July 1791

From Thomas Jefferson

Philadelphia July 17. 1791.

Dear Sir

I have a dozen times taken up my pen to write to you & as often laid it down again, suspended between opposing considerations. I determine however to write from a conviction that truth, between candid minds, can never do harm.

the first of Paine’s pamphlets on the Rights of man, which came to hand here, belonged to mr̃ Beckley.1 he lent it to mr̃ Madison who lent it to me; and while I was reading it mr̃ Beckley called on me for it, &, as I had not finished it, he desired me, as soon as I should have done so, to send it to mr̃ Jonathan B. Smith, whose brother meant to reprint it. I finished reading it, and, as I had no acquaintance with mr̃ Jonathan B. Smith, propriety required that I should explain to him why I, a stranger to him, sent him the pamphlet. I accordingly wrote a note of compliment informing him that I did it at the desire of mr̃ Beckley, &, to take off a little of the dryness of the note, I added that I was glad it was to be reprinted here & that something was to be publicly said against the political heresies which had sprung up among us &c. I thought so little of this note that I did not even keep a copy of it: nor ever heard a little more of it till, the week following, I was thunderstruck with seeing it come out at the head of the pamphlet. I hoped however it would not attract notice. but I found on my return from a journey of a month that a writer came forward under the signature of Publicola, attacking not only the author & principles of the pamphlet, but myself as it’s sponsor, by name. soon after came hosts of other writers defending the pamphlet & attacking you by name as the writer of Publicola. thus were our names thrown on the public stage as public antagonists. that you & I differ in our ideas of the best form of government is well known to us both: but we have differed as friends should do, respecting the purity of each other’s motives, & confining our difference of opinion to private conversation. and I can declare with truth in the presence of the almighty that nothing was further from my intention or expectation than to have had either my own or your name brought before the public on this occasion. the friendship & confidence which has so long existed between us required this explanation from me, & I know you too well to fear any misconstruction of the motives of it. some people here who would wish me to be, or to be thought, guilty of improprieties, have suggested that I was Agricola, that I was Brutus &c &c.2 I never did in my life, either by myself or by any other, have a sentence of mine inserted in a newspaper without putting my name to it; & I believe I never shall.

While the empress is refusing peace under a mediation unless Oczakow & it’s territory be ceded to her, she is offering peace on the perfect statu quo to the Porte, if they will conclude it without a mediation.3 France has struck a severe blow at our navigation by a difference of duty on tobo. carried in our & their ships, & by taking from foreign built ships the capability of naturalization. she has placed our whale oil on rather a better footing than ever by consolidating the duties into a single one of 6. livres.4 they amounted before to some sous over that sum. I am told (I know not how truly) that England has prohibited our spermaceti oil altogether, & will prohibit our wheat till the price there is 52/ the quarter, which it almost never is.5 we expect hourly to hear the true event of Genl. Scott’s expedition. reports give favorable hopes of it.6 be so good as to present my respectful compliments to mr̃s Adams & to accept assurances of the sentiments of sincere esteem & respect with which I am Dear sir / Your friend & servant

Th: Jefferson

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “the Vice president of the U. S.”; endorsed: “recd at Boston / July 28. 1791 / ansd. July 29”; docketed by JQA: “T. Jefferson. 17. July 1791.”; notation by CFA: “not published.” CFA presumably meant that the letter was not published in Jefferson, Correspondence, ed. Randolph.

1John Beckley (1757–1807) had served as clerk of the House of Representatives since 1789 (AFC description begins Adams Family Correspondence, ed. L. H. Butterfield, Marc Friedlaender, Richard Alan Ryerson, Margaret A. Hogan, Sara Martin, Hobson Woodward, and others, Cambridge, 1963– . description ends , 12:129).

2For JQA’s writings as Publicola, see Henry Knox’s 10 June 1791 letter, and note 3, above. Anonymous authors operating as Brutus in the Boston Columbian Centinel and Agricola in the Boston Independent Chronicle alleged that Publicola supported monarchy and aristocracy. Jefferson similarly denied the association in a 10 July letter to confidant James Monroe, observing: “A host of writers have risen in favor of Paine, and prove that in this quarter at least the spirit of republicanism is sound. The contrary spirit of the high officers of government is more understood than I expected” (Jefferson, Papers description begins The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd, Charles T. Cullen, John Catanzariti, Barbara B. Oberg, James P. McClure, and others, Princeton, N.J., 1950– . description ends , 20:282, 297).

3Following a string of heavy losses, by 1791 the Ottoman Empire sought a peaceful resolution to the Russo-Turkish War, for which see Jefferson’s 30 Aug. letter, and note 3, below. Under the Treaty of Jassy of 1792, Russia annexed Ochakov, Ukraine, bolstering its power in the Black Sea (John P. LeDonne, The Grand Strategy of the Russian Empire, 1650–1831, N.Y., 2004, p. 100).

4On 1 March 1791 the French National Assembly constrained the incoming tobacco trade as Jefferson described. The next day it reduced importation duties on American whale oil from twelve livres per quintal to six (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series description begins The Papers of George Washington: Presidential Series, ed. W. W. Abbot, Dorothy Twohig, Jack D. Warren, Mark A. Mastromarino, Robert F. Haggard, Christine S. Patrick, John C. Pinheiro, David R. Hoth, Jennifer Stertzer and others, Charlottesville, Va., 1987– . description ends , 7:520).

5Enforcement of Great Britain’s Corn Laws, which regulated the import and export of wheat and grain, caused considerable controversy until their 1846 repeal. Under the revised act of 1791, duties skyrocketed and triggered higher market prices (Mary A. M. Marks, The Corn Laws: A Popular History, London, 1908, p. 15, 16).

6Following Brig. Gen. Josiah Harmar’s 1790 defeat at the hands of the Shawnees near the Miami villages on the Maumee River in modern-day Fort Wayne, Ind., on 9 March 1791 George Washington and Henry Knox authorized Brig. Gen. Charles Scott to lead a contingent of Kentucky militia to strike the Ouiatanon (Wea) villages on the Wabash River. Scott’s forces killed an estimated 32 Native fighters, captured sixty women and children, and razed three towns (vol. 20:472; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series description begins The Papers of George Washington: Presidential Series, ed. W. W. Abbot, Dorothy Twohig, Jack D. Warren, Mark A. Mastromarino, Robert F. Haggard, Christine S. Patrick, John C. Pinheiro, David R. Hoth, Jennifer Stertzer and others, Charlottesville, Va., 1987– . description ends , 8:304).

Index Entries