To George Washington from Timothy Pickering, 13 October 1798
From Timothy Pickering
Trenton [N.J.] Oct. 13 1798
Sir,
I seize the first conveyance to inform you that General Pinckney is out of France. He embarked with his family, about the middle of August, in the ship Hope, Capt. Hendrick Hendrickson, for New-York, where we may daily expect to hear of his arrival. The letter giving me this information is from a Monsieur Hory, dated at Bourdeaux the 27th of August; it came to hand last evening from Chester (Pennsylvania) where it arrived in the ship Franklin.1
Mr Fenwick inclosed me a letter from Mr Skipwith, dated at Paris the 21st of August, in which Skipwith says—“I have received to-day an official copy of the arret of the Directory taking off the embargo laid on our vessels. This arret is not yet published, but I hope it will be soon, in every part of France, and of course put to execution.” Fenwick writes on the 28th of August from Bordeaux, saying “This arret has not yet officially reached this port, but is hourly expected: tho’ some apprehensions are entertained that if the late accounts from Philadelphia, by the flag vessel the Liberty, that sailed about the 18th of July, and arrived here a few days past, should reach Paris before the execution of the arret raising the embargo, it may be delayed.” But I have a private letter from a reputable merchant at Bordeaux, dated the 27th of August, which says—“The news brought by the Liberty has made no great sensation.”2
I have a Paris paper dated the 24th of August, in which is a paragraph from Philadelphia dated July 24th. This paragraph mentions the acts of Congress for suspending all intercourse between the U. States & the French Dominions—for taking French cruizers on our coast & retaking their prizes—for a provisional army—for a direct tax on lands—and for expelling foreigners.3
In the same paper I find a paragraph of which the following is a translation.
“Paris August 23 1798. The Wife of la-Fayette has been some days in Paris. As she went away in virtue of regular passports, and the express permission of the Government, she comes back to restore order in her estates, impaired during her long detention in the Dungeons of the Emperor.”
The private letter above mentioned says—“The French Government wishes to keep peace with America. But a war with the emperor seems to be inevitable.” The correspondence between Talleyrand and Mr Gerry discovers a solicitude on the part of the former to avoid a rupture: the French Government, doubtless, is not yet ready to attack us.4
The Boston papers are beginning to puff Mr Gerry: but take into view the whole series, of his conduct in France, and he must, in the eyes of every man of sense, sink into contempt.
You will probably have seen my letter of the 29th ult. to P[eter] Johnston, returning the address to the President from the Freeholders of Prince Edward County; in that letter I disclosed a fact communicated to me by General Marshall, which I was glad to authenticate by my signature (for published anonymously it would have been denied by some, and doubted by others) and in which you will see an evidence of Talleyrand’s unblushing impudence, and of Gerry’s timidity & meanness in consenting to give up the names of X & Y when they have dined with him at Talleyrands table, & after dinner renewed their money propositions!5 But there is another fact which I take from his own letter to me dated in Nantasket Road the 1st instant, detailing his correspondence with Talleyrand. When Talleyrand sent him his letter of June 1 asking the names of the persons designated by X Y & Z. Gerry desired to know of the bearer why application was again made to him for the names of the intriguers, when they could be otherwise ascertained. The Bearer answered, that he believed, by the exertions of the Bureau & of the officers of the police of the city, the names were discovered; and he mentioned them to Mr Gerry: but he added, that matters were become serious; that the Directory expected something from him, in confirmation of this discovery; and that this was the use which would be made of his letters. Yet Gerry thinks to shield himself from the charge of violating the faith of the Envoys pledged to X & Y “that in no event should their names be made public”—by “guarding against the publication on his authority!” Pitiful subterfuge! added to unexampled meanness, in stooping to comply, in any form, with the insulting demand!6 I have the honour to be, with great respect, sir, your most obt servant,
Timothy Pickering
ALS, PPRF; ALS (letterpress copy), MHi: Pickering Papers.
1. Daniel Huger (later Charles Lucas Pinckney) Horry, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney’s nephew, had been in France since “the commencement of the revolution” (GW to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 24 June 1797, n.1). A copy of the letter from Horry of 27 Aug. is in MHi: Adams Papers, enclosed in a letter from Pickering to John Adams of 13 October.
2. A French decree of 9 July 1798 had placed an embargo on American ships in French ports; this was repealed by another decree on 16 August. Copies of the letters from Fulwar Skipwith of 21 Aug. 1798 and Joseph Fenwick of 28 Aug. are in MHi: Adams Papers, enclosed in a letter from Pickering to Adams of 13 Oct. 1798. The “reputable merchant” is Theodore Peters, whose letter is in MHi: Pickering Papers.
3. These are “An Act to suspend the commercial intercourse between the United States and France, and the dependencies thereof” ( 565–66 [13 June 1798]), “An Act further to protect the Commerce of the United States” ( 578–80 [9 July 1798]), “An Act authorizing the President of the United States to raise a Provisional Army” ( 558–61 [28 May 1798]), “An Act to lay and collect a direct tax within the United States” ( 597–604 [14 July 1798]), and either “An Act concerning Aliens” ( 570–72 [25 June 1798]) or “An Act respecting Alien Enemies” ( 577–78 [6 July 1798]).
4. For the correspondence between Elbridge Gerry and Talleyrand, see 2:209–22.
5. The address from the freeholders of Prince Edward County to John Adams of 21 Aug. took the president severely to task for his French policy and depicted the congressional war resolutions as part of a conspiracy against the rights of the people. Pickering refused to submit the address to Adams and instead wrote his own scathing reply on 29 September. See 3:471–79.
6. Gerry’s letter to Pickering of 1 Oct. is printed in 2:204–8.