From Jeremy Belknap to John Adams, 24 January 1795
From Jeremy Belknap
Boston Jany 24 1795
Dear sir
I thank you for your favour of the 16th recd this day It is a great pleasure to me to find that none of the Gentn of Congress in the years 1779 & 80 remember any such thing as Dr K has asserted. Our present Govr who was then a delegate says the same— I shall ask Mr Gerry when I see him—& shall wait with as much patience as the nature of the subject will admit for your further communications.
Since I wrote to you on this subject I have been again wounded by an unmerited reflection on our Country from the pen of the late Secy of War; & have tho’t it my duty by the advice of 2 or 3 judicious friends, publickly to detect his mistake. In the Centinel of this date you may see my address signed with my initials. It is certainly well intended & I hope will be well received. I mean to be a fair antagonist & therefore beg you to deliver him the enclosed (if he should be at Phila) after you have read & sealed it.1
I thank you for the memoir on weights & measures—one Copy shall be delivered to the Secy of the Academy. It is not improbable that some of our dablers in the Apocalype may set down the new standard of weights & measures as “the mark of the beast” if “no man is to buy or sell” but by that standard. But how they will contrive a decimal division of 666 I know not.
I should not think it strange if the French in their rage for decimals should make a reform in the Zodiac as well as in the Calendar & reduce the signs to ten, corresponding to their ten months.2 in that case the Lion must be rejected as an emblem of monarchy— The ram & the bull will be deemed aristocrates—& possibly the Goat unless he should serve as an emblem of Liberty— The scales will probably be retained for their equality, & the twins & fishes for the sake of Fraternity. The virgin I suppose will be united with the Waterer to make her prolific & the motley figure of the Archer may with some propriety be called Marat3 or represent the Jacobins
Will you be so good as to tell me whether the President when he sent a proclamation for Thanksgiving to one Governor expected that it would be reinforced by his authority & that of the Council? We have now 2 proclamations handed to us to be read in public—one is distributed by the Marshal of the district—the other having the order of Govr & Council at the top by the Sheriff! the latter is printed by Adams & Larkin at the Expense (I suppose) of the state!4
I am, Dear Sir, with great Esteem & respect / Your obliged friend & hble servt
Jeremy Belknap
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Hoñ Dr Adams.”
1. Belknap’s enclosure, not found, was his response to Secretary of War Henry Knox’s public criticism of the federal policy toward Native Americans and western expansion in his final report to the president of 29 Dec. 1794. “The desires of too many frontier white people to seize by force or fraud upon the neighbouring Indian lands has been and still continues to be an unceasing cause of Jealousy and hatred on the part of the Indians,” Knox wrote, adding suggestions to improve U.S.-Native American relations. Belknap defended the Washington administration’s efforts, pointing out that Native customs and forms of subsistence differed from those of American settlers, factors that complicated the prospect of peace on the frontier. “Husbandmen and Hunters, civilized and uncivilized people, cannot generally, live within the same limits; or if there be an attempt to incorporate them into the same society, the former will always rise superior, and the latter will sink into a state of dependence,” he wrote ( , 17:328–332; Boston Columbian Centinel, 24 Jan. 1795).
2. In the autumn of 1793, the French National Convention abolished the use of regnal years and the Gregorian calendar, declaring it to be the first year of the French republic. This system divided the month into three “décades” of ten-day weeks and began in September, or vendémiaire, when the autumnal equinox was marked in Paris. The final five days of the year were reserved for festivals. It remained in place until 1805 (Matthew Shaw, Time and the French Revolution: The Republican Calendar, 1789-Year XIV, Woodbridge, Eng., 2011 p. 3).