James Madison Papers

To James Madison from Edward Carrington, 16 February 1789

From Edward Carrington

Richmond Feby. 16. 1789

My dr sir,

With great pleasure I received your favor of the 20th. Ult,1 but being distant from Town it did not reach me until about two days ago—the bad weather and other circumstances prevented my being in Richmond at the time of the meeting of the Electors—you have doubtless learned e’er this, that it was not my duty to be there—the antifederalism of my district would have kept out any person whatever under the Name of a Federalist—the issue of this Election fully shews that it was well judged not to try for Congress—a veiw of the papers had pretty well shewn that Jno Adams was the proper Man for Virga. to Vote for as V. P. at least as to a tolerable number of Votes, indeed to ensure Genl W. foremost, it was proper that some votes should be given to others & seeing that so few Anti’s were in, to Vote for Clinton, the two Votes that were given to Jay & Hancock were so given with propriety, in my opinion. I presume you have heard that the votes stood thus for V. P. 5 for Adams, 3 for Clinton, 1 for Jay & 1. for Hancock.

Accept my most Cordial congratulations my good Freind upon your success in your Election—it is an event which I am convinced would not have taken place a fortnight sooner, had it been then tried, and I am equally well convinced, that had you staid away, it would not have happened at all. I am exceedingly glad you acted in opposition to your own & my sentiments in Coming to Virga. I own I did not suppose it possible for your personal attendance in the district to produce an extensive change, limited as your movements must be in so short a time—your letters however have done much good. I have seen Colo. Nichs. Cabel2 since the Election, who says that even in Amherst they made many votes odds. It is but justice for me to tell you, that in Goochland you are much indebted to Ronald—but for some explanations which he gave to the people at the preceeding Court, upon the Misrepresentations of Mr. Guarrant, you would have had a great Majority against you there.3 Ronald is now, and was during the Assembly, a decided & bold Federalist. He tells me he was equally decided in the Convention but that he thought it best to keep his sentiments to himself until he came to Vote.

Our Elections both of Electors & [Repre]sentatives throughout the State have [ter]minated much better than we had reason a few months ago to expect. I am happy to find too that the measures of our Assembly upon the subject of the constitution meet with but little approbation even from Antifederalists. I think that things are taking an happy turn amongst the people. I am my Dr sir, yr. Afft. Freind & Servt.

Ed. Carrington

RC (DLC); Tr (NN). RC addressed by Carrington and franked. Brackets enclose letters obscured when seal was removed.

1Letter not found.

2Nicholas Cabell (1750–1803) represented Amherst County in the House of Delegates and Senate between 1779 and 1801 (Alexander Brown, The Cabells and Their Kin: A Memorial Volume of History, Biography, and Genealogy [Richmond, 1939], pp. 158–69; Swem and Williams, Register description begins Earl G. Swem and John W. Williams, eds., A Register of the General Assembly of Virginia, 1776–1918, and of the Constitutional Conventions (Richmond, 1918). description ends , p. 354).

3John Guerrant (b. 1760) of Goochland County served in the House of Delegates from 1787 to 1796. As a member of the convention of 1788 he voted against ratification of the Constitution (Swem and Williams, Register description begins Earl G. Swem and John W. Williams, eds., A Register of the General Assembly of Virginia, 1776–1918, and of the Constitutional Conventions (Richmond, 1918). description ends , p. 382; Grigsby, Virginia Convention of 1788, I, 346 n.; II, 374).

Index Entries