You
have
selected
Period
- Washington Presidency (10)
- Adams Presidency (5)
Dates From
Dates To
No. | Author | Recipient | Title | Date | Context |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 9 December 1793 | 1793-12-09 | I inclose M r . Dallas’ publication relative to his interview with M r . Genet— At present I am... |
2 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 15[–16] December 1793 | ≈1793-12-15 | Soon after M r . Genet’s arrival from New york he had an interview with the Attorney general, at... |
3 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 5 January 1794 | 1794-01-05 | I gave to M r . Kent a copy of the correspondence between M r . Jefferson and M r . Genet, and... |
4 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 2 March 1794 | 1794-03-02 | I received yours of the 25. Ult. on Friday, and yesterday delivered to the president, the paper... |
5 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 2 May 1794 | 1794-05-02 | I have not been able to decide in the affirmative: the equality of parties in the Senate, the... |
6 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 29 January 1796 | 1796-01-29 | M r . Harper concurs in the idea of printing by way of note, your return Letter to him, and by... |
7 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 25 August 1796 | 1796-08-25 | All that I have yet seen here, corresponds with the information you gave ^us^ respecting the... |
8 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 12 November 1796 | 1796-11-12 | I take the Liberty to introduce to you M r . Macdonald and M r . Rich the british commissioners... |
9 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 10 January 1797 | 1797-01-10 | You probably will have heard before this Letter gives you the information, that the Directory... |
10 | King, Rufus | Jay, John | To John Jay from Rufus King, 6 February 1797 | 1797-02-06 | I thought it probable that the Directory after refusing to receive General Pinckney would have... |