131George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 24 January 1780 (Hamilton Papers)
Morristown [ New Jersey ] January 24, 1780 . Asks Greene to rectify the present difficulties concerning the Chevalier de Rochefontaine’s quarters. Df , in writing of H, George Washington Papers, Library of Congress. Captain Etienne Nicolas Marie Béchet, Chevalier de Rochefontaine.
132From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 24 January 1780 (Washington Papers)
Capn De Rochfontaine has represented to me that having obtained quarters by regular application to Mr Lewis whose certificate is inclosed, he has been in his absence dispossessed by your order in favor of Lt Coll Stevens, and no other quarters provided for him. From your letter to the justice which I have seen, you appear not to have known the circumstance of Capn Rochfontain’s having been...
133From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 27 January 1780 (Washington Papers)
Having considered the Act of the 27th of December directing the dismission of the Express riders and a subsequent On⟨e⟩ of the 14th of January, in consequence of my Letter founded on the former, the op⟨e⟩ration of which I had in some measure suspended —it would be improper for me to continue the suspension longer in any degree, or to direct any Expresses to be retained, except with the main...
134From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 30 January 1780 (Washington Papers)
By advices received from General St Clair who is on the lines, it appears that the enemy have augmented their force considerably on Staten Island, and at Pawlus Hook. From this circumstance, and their impressing sleds (as it is said on Bergen neck) it would seem as if they had some offensive operation in view. I have therefore to request that you will use your best endeavours for the purpose...
135George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 8 February 1780 (Hamilton Papers)
Morristown [ New Jersey ] February 8, 1780 . Sends instructions for paying for transportation of the Army. Df , in writing of H, George Washington Papers, Library of Congress.
136From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 8 February 1780 (Washington Papers)
I have received your letter of this day inclosing Copy of one from Colo. Berry, representing the unwillingness of the inhabitants to transport for the Army at the regulated prices, from an apprehension that the regulation will not be general. It would be excessively disagreeable to me to authorise a departure from the law, especially, in an affair of so delicate a nature, and yet it is...
137From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 9 February 1780 (Washington Papers)
The inclosed was transmitted me by the board of war, through the Baron Steuben, and returns requested agreeably thereto. You will be pleased to have them made out as soon as convenient, including the forage masters department on the same form. I am Sir Your obt hble sert LS , in James McHenry’s writing, PPAmP : Nathanael Greene Papers. A note in Greene’s writing underneath the docket reads:...
138From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 18 February 1780 (Washington Papers)
As you appear to be of opinion in your letter of this date that the loss of the cattle and perhaps the failure of the attempt, would be the consequence, should the team with the clothing set out for Albany under the present circumstances of the weather—I think it had better be deferred at least till the prospect of travelling is better—I wish it had been in our power to have taken advantage of...
139From Alexander Hamilton to Major General Nathanael Greene, [23 February 1780] (Hamilton Papers)
Have you received any directions from The General concerning some espontoons to be brought from Fish Kill for the use of the Officers here? If you have not be pleased to receive them now and give directions accordingly. Yr. obedient humble serv ALS , Library of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.
140From George Washington to Major General Nathanael Greene, 25 February 1780 (Washington Papers)
I recd yours late last evening, inclosing Colo. Biddles representation of the state of our forage—which is indeed alarming. As the State of Jersey, on which we must depend untill a supply can be brought from a distance, have, in consequence of the recommendation of Congress, taken upon themselves to procure a certain quantity of provision and forage, I think Colo. Biddle ought, without loss of...