You
have
selected

  • Author

    • Smith, Melancton
  • Period

    • Confederation Period
  • Project

    • Hamilton Papers

Recipient

Sort: Frequency / Alphabetical

    Show: Top 0

    Dates From

    Dates To

    Search help
    Documents filtered by: Author="Smith, Melancton" AND Period="Confederation Period" AND Project="Hamilton Papers"
    Results 1-10 of 10 sorted by date (descending)
    • |<
    • <<
    • <
    • Page 1
    • >
    • >>
    • >|
    Mr. Hamilton.   1st. our powers—agreed yt. the Constitution, was advisory—suppose the Constitution advice, we must refer to the instrument—it is impossible that the Convenn. or the people shd. have had in view, such alterations because until they had assented, there was no body to submit amendments to—there being no common body to determine. Therefore it must of necessity been their view that...
    Mr. Hamilton—Rises with reluctance. 1. because he wishes to conciliate. 2. That he is plausiable— Beleives it will not answer the purpose—though he thinks the Genn. means it to be so. The impost, acceded to—instanced—shd admonish us. 2 questions arise— 1. Our own powers 2d. The powers of Congress to receive and ye proby. No power except to accept or reject. 1st. Acts. The Resolution of the...
    Mr. Hamilton—The Gentn. states, the danger of making Loans in extreme—no Instances to prove. A nation will seldom make them unless necessary. Rarely happens that Nations in peace ours ⟨–⟩ singular instance— To prevent Loans, is to give them ye commd. of all their resources. The Gentn. think it necessary to lay checks—he reasons diff—no Checks should be laid, in order to guard against foreign...
    Mr Hamilton sd. If the States are not united, therefore necessary to clog it—concludes the other way. The major Interests, ought always to govern. If it shd. become a steady principle, not to make war for rights, soon have no rights. Melancton Smith MS Notes, from the original in the New York State Library, Albany. See “New York Ratifying Convention. Introductory Note,” June 17–July 26, 1788 .
    Power of Restraint dangerous—we may have a War of defence—therefore dangerous. The reasoning restri[c]ting just or unjust. The object to carry on war for defence ill founded as applys. Contending for corruption of a majority. They say a Corrupt. to a small part—Improbable the whole, shall be corrupted, and corrupt ye whole. Republic less likely to go to Melancton Smith MS Notes, from the...
    The Gent. of Ulster seems to suspect ⟨ags.⟩ were intrd. to shew inconsisty. The papers read, to prove the distress ys. State suffered. The inefficacy of Requisn.—the sentt. of ye Legislar—Dictator ye ebullition of ardent What is energetic fedl. govt—one operatg. on States or individs. Impost once passed—then repeald, afterwds. defeated—his opn. always for it—takes it for granted—but opposed in...
    It is natural to suspect such a power—of money—more than necessity of govt. Men predjudiced. Have read govt.—wrong Ideas—his Ideas to give a safe and equal repr—no danger to entrust rulers in Republics. Owes it origin to the present times. This a Republic Govt— One part to be chosen by ye. people for two years. The next chosen for 6 years by peoples Repre. The presid. chosen imediately by ye...
    The mind at ye Revolution run into extremes—the extreme was, we consulted nothing but to tie the Representative to ye people. A Stable body wh. oppurtunty. to know guard ags. instability The people of every country desire its prosperity but want information. Frequently misled by artful Men. Concilliate two objects. One Body who shall be closely united to the people, this in the Representative....
    Mr. Hamilton. Agrees with me in the first principle of a broad basis. It resulted from compromise. secure at present. 3 years. fallacy—the body havg. a permt. Int. The Int. not for it. Public opinion governs ye people in France. The Argument from public opinion concludes to any thing. The numbers of the State will be diminishd. It may be the case accordy. to ye States. The State governments...
    The Govt. is to be rejected if bad. Not call reasoning, declamation. Radical defect of the Constitution is, that it operates upon individuals not on States. This proved from experience. In the war, patriotism operd. in the room of goverment— On record by Resolutions of both the principle admitted. Several States will be delinqt. at the same time, and therefore will not coerce. Suppose one...