You
have
selected
Recipient
Sort: Frequency / Alphabetical
- McHenry, James (498)
- Washington, George (494)
- Hamilton, Elizabeth (112)
- Lincoln, Benjamin (109)
- Speaker of the House of Representatives (98)
- Wolcott, Oliver, Jr. (88)
- Smith, William Stephens (84)
- Coxe, Tench (80)
- Stevens, Ebenezer (80)
- Williams, Otho H. (80)
Show: Top 10 / Top 50
Period
- Colonial (36)
- Revolutionary War (751)
- Confederation Period (552)
- Washington Presidency (3,266)
- Adams Presidency (2,215)
- Jefferson Presidency (192)
Dates From
Dates To
No. | Author | Recipient | Title | Date | Context |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
61 | Morris, Richard | Report of a Committee of the New York State Society of … | 1786-07-06 | The Committee to whom were referred the proceedings of the Society of the Cincinnati, at their... | |
62 | Brown, Ethan | Smith, William Stephens | Enclosure: [Account of the Incident at Elizabethtown] … | 1800-03-27 | Some publications having appeared in the news papers in respect to a disturbance at Elizabeth... |
63 | Brown, Ethan | Enclosure: Act for Establishing a Military and Naval … | 1800-03-09 | An Act for establishing an Academy for Instruction relative to the Military and Naval Service of... | |
64 | Burr, Aaron | Statement by Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, [5 July … | 1799-07-05 | We the Subscribers do certify that Col Ebenezer Stevens was together with ourselves appointed by... | |
65 | Hamilton, Alexander | McHenry, James | Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, and Ebenezer Stevens to … | 1798-06-14 | We have carefully attended to the subjects presented to our consideration, by your note of... |
66 | “C” | [“C”], [10 November 1792] | 1792-11-10 | [Philadelphia] Gazette of the United States , November 10, 1792. Philip Marsh has written: “In... | |
67 | “C” | [“C”], [20 June 1792] | 1792-06-20 | [Philadelphia] Gazette of the United States , June 20, 1792. Philip Marsh has written: “On June... | |
68 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. X, [26 August 1795] | 1795-08-26 | The object of the third article is connected with that of the second. The surrender of the posts... | |
69 | “Camillus” | From Alexander Hamilton to Defence No. XX, [23 and 24 … | 1795-10-24 | The point next to be examined is the right of confiscation or sequestration, as depending on the... | |
70 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XI, [28 August 1795] | 1795-08-28 | The foregoing analysis of the third article, by fixing its true meaning, enables us to detect... | |
71 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXXVI, [2 January 1796] | 1796-01-02 | It is now time to fulfil my promise of an examination of the constitutionality of the Treaty. Of... | |
72 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXII, [5–11 November 1795] | 1795-11-11 | The analogy of the stipulation in the 10th article with stipulations in our other treaties and in... | |
73 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XV, [12 and 14 September 1795] | 1795-09-14 | [ It is the business of the seventh article of the treaty, to provide for two objects: one,... | |
74 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. I, [22 July 1795] | 1795-07-22 | IT was to have been foreseen, that the treaty which Mr. Jay was charged to negociate with Great... | |
75 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. IV, [1 August 1795] | 1795-08-01 | An accurate enumeration of the breaches of the Treaty of peace on our part would require a... | |
76 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXXVII, [6 January 1796] | 1796-01-06 | It shall now be shewn, that the objections to the Treaty founded on its pretended interference... | |
77 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XVII, [22 September 1795] | 1795-09-22 | The VIII article provides merely that the Commissioners to be appointed in the three preceding... | |
78 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. VI, [8 August 1795] | 1795-08-08 | There is one more objection to the Treaty for what it does not do, which requires to be noticed.... | |
79 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XVIII, [6 October 1795] | 1795-10-06 | It is provided by The tenth article of the Treaty that “Neither Debts due from individuals of the... | |
80 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. III, [29 July 1795] | 1795-07-29 | The opposers of the Treaty seem to have put invention on the rack, to accumulate charges against... | |
81 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XIX, [14 October 1795] | 1795-10-14 | The objects protected by the 10th. article are classed under four heads, 1 debts of... | |
82 | “Camillus“ | The Defence No. IX, [21 August 1795] | 1795-08-21 | It was my intention to have comprised in two numbers the examination of the second article; but... | |
83 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXI, [30 October 1795] | 1795-10-30 | Since the closing of my last number, I have accidentally turned to a passage of Vatel , which is... | |
84 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XII, [2–3 September 1795] | 1795-09-03 | The remaining allegations in disparagement of the 3 article are to this effect 1 That the... | |
85 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXXI, [12 December 1795] | 1795-12-12 | I resume the subject of the two last papers for the sake of a few supplementary observations. The... | |
86 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXXII, [16 December 1795] | 1795-12-16 | The 18th Article of the Treaty, which regulates the subject of contraband, has been grievously... | |
87 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XIII, [5 September 1795] | 1795-09-05 | The 4th and 5th articles of the Treaty from similarity of object will naturally be considered... | |
88 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XVI, [18 September 1795] | 1795-09-18 | The second object of the seventh article, as stated in my last number, is “compensation to... | |
89 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. II, [25 July 1795] | 1795-07-25 | Previous to a more particular discussion of the merits of the Treaty, it may be useful to advert... | |
90 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XXXVIII, [9 January 1796] | 1796-01-09 | The manner in which the power of Treaty as it exists in the Constitution was understood by the... |