3931To George Washington from John Sinclair, 18 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
Duplicate As you are a member of the Board of Agriculture, I can, without impropriety, transmit to you, for your private information, the printed papers herewith sent, which however imperfect, yet will give some Idea of the nature and importance of Mr Elkingtons discoveries in the Art of Draining[.] If a committee were appointed to take the inclosed printed Plan of an Agreement, together with...
3932[Diary entry: 17 July 1795] (Washington Papers)
17. Southerly & growing warmer.
3933[Diary entry: 17 July 1795] (Washington Papers)
17. Breakfasted before I set out. Dined at Hartford & lodged at Websters. Brot. on the sick horse led. hartford : Harford Town, Md., now called Bush. The town was the county seat of Harford County from 1744 to 1782. websters : probably the tavern at the head of Bird River that earlier was called Skerrett’s and also Cheyns’s.
3934To George Washington from “Cassius,” 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
NO period since the revolution, has been pregnant with more important events to this country, than the present. We are in a situation at once the most humiliating and the most critical. Every friend to his country regards the consequences of Mr. Jay’s NEGOCIATION with apprehension.—Whatever may be its ultimate fate, the most threatning prospects present themselves on every side. Such is the...
3935To George Washington from John Gill, 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
The delay you complain of has not been occasioned by me but by the Absence of Mr Lee from this place, first at Richmond then in Westmoreland & afterward in Loudon where he was obliged to go to avoied his family havg the smallPox—It was but the other Day I wrote him stating that I was fearful you would complain of me for not forwarding the Deeds —To Morrow I will assuredly see him again & all...
3936To George Washington from Henry Lee, 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
It was a long time before I had an opportunity of making known to Mr Henry the purport of that part of your letr to me which concerns him. But very lately have I received his reply, which I beg leave to enclose for your perusal. I am very confident that Mr H. possesses the highest & truest regard for you & that he continues friendly to the g. government, notwithstanding the unwearied effects...
3937From John Marsden Pintard to Bartholomew Dandridge, Jr., 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
The foregoing is copy of my Respects to you under date of the 19th Ultimo. I have now the Pleasure to hand you Invoice and Bill of Loading for the Two pipes of wine Shiped by me per your order On Board the Ship Ganges Thomas Tingey Commander for acct and Risque of the President of the United States and for their amt, Being Eighty Pounds Sterling I have this day drawn on you at thirty days...
3938To George Washington from Portsmouth, N.H., Citizens, 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
Convinced of your inviolable attachment to the Interest & happiness of the States over which you preside & your readiness on all occasions to attend to every just complaint of the People—We the Citizens of Portsmouth constitutionally assembled in public Town meeting to signify our opinions relative to the Treaty between Great Britain & the United States of America consented to by a Majority of...
3939To George Washington from Edmund Randolph, 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
Altho’ you will have seen the commissioners of the Fœderal City, before their inclosed letter reaches Mount Vernon; I have supposed, that it will be better to transmit it to you. Mr Adet has sent me a decree of the national convention; by which they expressly violate our treaty of commerce with France; by declaring that hostile property may be seized on board of neutral vessels, until their...
3940To George Washington from Edmund Randolph, 17 July 1795 (Washington Papers)
Since writing a quarter of an hour ago, I find, that by not understanding the French Calendar, I am totally mistaken in my account of the French decree. The French Minister sent me two decrees, one of which is to the effect, mentioned in my other letter. But it is prior to the other, which is of a contrary import, and which until this moment I supposed to be repealed. So that the favorable...